Computational assessment of the aesthetic quality of map colors

IF 2.1 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Mingguang Wu, Yanjie Sun, Xianqin Xia
{"title":"Computational assessment of the aesthetic quality of map colors","authors":"Mingguang Wu, Yanjie Sun, Xianqin Xia","doi":"10.1111/tgis.13206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Crafting beautiful map colors is challenging for not only experts but also novices, suggesting the need for an aesthetic quality assessment of map colors for the effective design of maps and visualizations. To fill this gap, we present a computational method to assess the aesthetic quality of map colors. First, we couple the idea of computational aesthetics with map aesthetic principles and identify four and two basic types of aesthetic features in terms of <jats:italic>order</jats:italic> and <jats:italic>complexity</jats:italic>, respectively. Then, we collect 2000 map samples and derive 149 aesthetic metrics by instantiating the above aesthetic features while considering the spatial weights and figure–ground organization of the map samples. We also recruit participants (<jats:italic>N</jats:italic> = 438) to rate the aesthetic quality of the map colors. Finally, we train an aesthetic predictor by fitting those aesthetic metrics with user ratings. The experimental results show that the proposed method can assess aesthetic quality of map colors with high accuracy (<jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.73 on the training set and <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.65 on the validation set). We also explore the dominant aesthetic metrics that positively and negatively influence aesthetic appreciation, as well as those metrics that have no significant influence. This work offers a portable and flexible aesthetic quality assessment approach for map colors and can be further improved by considering complex symbols, spatial structures, and color–semantic and color–emotion associations.","PeriodicalId":47842,"journal":{"name":"Transactions in GIS","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions in GIS","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tgis.13206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Crafting beautiful map colors is challenging for not only experts but also novices, suggesting the need for an aesthetic quality assessment of map colors for the effective design of maps and visualizations. To fill this gap, we present a computational method to assess the aesthetic quality of map colors. First, we couple the idea of computational aesthetics with map aesthetic principles and identify four and two basic types of aesthetic features in terms of order and complexity, respectively. Then, we collect 2000 map samples and derive 149 aesthetic metrics by instantiating the above aesthetic features while considering the spatial weights and figure–ground organization of the map samples. We also recruit participants (N = 438) to rate the aesthetic quality of the map colors. Finally, we train an aesthetic predictor by fitting those aesthetic metrics with user ratings. The experimental results show that the proposed method can assess aesthetic quality of map colors with high accuracy (R2 = 0.73 on the training set and R2 = 0.65 on the validation set). We also explore the dominant aesthetic metrics that positively and negatively influence aesthetic appreciation, as well as those metrics that have no significant influence. This work offers a portable and flexible aesthetic quality assessment approach for map colors and can be further improved by considering complex symbols, spatial structures, and color–semantic and color–emotion associations.
地图色彩美学质量的计算评估
制作精美的地图色彩不仅对专家而且对新手都具有挑战性,这表明需要对地图色彩进行审美质量评估,以便有效地设计地图和可视化内容。为了填补这一空白,我们提出了一种评估地图色彩美学质量的计算方法。首先,我们将计算美学的理念与地图美学原理相结合,分别从秩序和复杂性两个方面确定了四种和两种基本类型的美学特征。然后,我们收集了 2000 个地图样本,通过将上述审美特征实例化,同时考虑地图样本的空间权重和图地组织,得出了 149 个审美度量指标。我们还招募参与者(N = 438)对地图颜色的审美质量进行评分。最后,我们通过拟合这些美学指标与用户评分来训练美学预测器。实验结果表明,所提出的方法能够高精度地评估地图颜色的审美质量(训练集上的 R2 = 0.73,验证集上的 R2 = 0.65)。我们还探索了对审美鉴赏有积极和消极影响的主要审美指标,以及那些没有显著影响的指标。这项工作为地图颜色提供了一种便携、灵活的审美质量评估方法,并可通过考虑复杂符号、空间结构以及颜色-语义和颜色-情感关联来进一步改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transactions in GIS
Transactions in GIS GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: Transactions in GIS is an international journal which provides a forum for high quality, original research articles, review articles, short notes and book reviews that focus on: - practical and theoretical issues influencing the development of GIS - the collection, analysis, modelling, interpretation and display of spatial data within GIS - the connections between GIS and related technologies - new GIS applications which help to solve problems affecting the natural or built environments, or business
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信