{"title":"Carbon Abatement and Socio-environmental Impacts Oriented to Government Policies and Corporate Social Responsibility","authors":"Hua Wang, Yanle Xie, Cuicui Wang, Weihua Huang","doi":"10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Under the constraint of considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), companies have to consider the impact of corporate social responsibility on their production operations and carbon abatement decisions. Therefore, we develop three decision models to explore the impact of different subsidy policies on manufacturers’ carbon emission reduction under CSR, and analyze the optimal subsidy policies. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of CSR on social welfare and social environment under different subsidy policies. We find that manufacturers are more willing to reduce carbon emissions, mitigate negative environmental impacts, and improve social welfare under consumer subsidies. However, we find that social welfare and socio-environmental impacts under consumer subsidies are not necessarily better than manufacturer subsidies when the level of CSR is low. Besides, we show that manufacturer subsidies are not always beneficial for improving social welfare and reducing negative socio-environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that manufacturer subsidies may lead to worse environmental impacts and social welfare when the level of CSR is low.</p>","PeriodicalId":47435,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Knowledge Economy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-024-02117-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Under the constraint of considering corporate social responsibility (CSR), companies have to consider the impact of corporate social responsibility on their production operations and carbon abatement decisions. Therefore, we develop three decision models to explore the impact of different subsidy policies on manufacturers’ carbon emission reduction under CSR, and analyze the optimal subsidy policies. Furthermore, we investigate the impact of CSR on social welfare and social environment under different subsidy policies. We find that manufacturers are more willing to reduce carbon emissions, mitigate negative environmental impacts, and improve social welfare under consumer subsidies. However, we find that social welfare and socio-environmental impacts under consumer subsidies are not necessarily better than manufacturer subsidies when the level of CSR is low. Besides, we show that manufacturer subsidies are not always beneficial for improving social welfare and reducing negative socio-environmental impacts. Moreover, we find that manufacturer subsidies may lead to worse environmental impacts and social welfare when the level of CSR is low.
期刊介绍:
In the context of rapid globalization and technological capacity, the world’s economies today are driven increasingly by knowledge—the expertise, skills, experience, education, understanding, awareness, perception, and other qualities required to communicate, interpret, and analyze information. New wealth is created by the application of knowledge to improve productivity—and to create new products, services, systems, and process (i.e., to innovate). The Journal of the Knowledge Economy focuses on the dynamics of the knowledge-based economy, with an emphasis on the role of knowledge creation, diffusion, and application across three economic levels: (1) the systemic ''meta'' or ''macro''-level, (2) the organizational ''meso''-level, and (3) the individual ''micro''-level. The journal incorporates insights from the fields of economics, management, law, sociology, anthropology, psychology, and political science to shed new light on the evolving role of knowledge, with a particular emphasis on how innovation can be leveraged to provide solutions to complex problems and issues, including global crises in environmental sustainability, education, and economic development. Articles emphasize empirical studies, underscoring a comparative approach, and, to a lesser extent, case studies and theoretical articles. The journal balances practice/application and theory/concepts.