Evaluating the effects of cotton intercropping on cool-season perennial forage persistence, forage mass, and nutritive value in the southeastern United States

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Eric D. Billman, W. Tillman Myers
{"title":"Evaluating the effects of cotton intercropping on cool-season perennial forage persistence, forage mass, and nutritive value in the southeastern United States","authors":"Eric D. Billman,&nbsp;W. Tillman Myers","doi":"10.1002/agj2.21625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Integrated forage–row cropping systems provide important agronomic and economic benefits to producers. However, little attention has been given to incorporating forages into row crop systems unique to the southeastern United States. This study assessed the viability of intercropping cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) on perennial, cool-season legumes during the summer months in the Southeast Coastal Plain over two production years. Treatments included a weedy fallow, annual ryegrass (ARG; <i>Lolium multiflorum</i> Lam.) monoculture, a red clover (RC; <i>Trifolium pratense</i> L.) and white clover (WC; <i>Trifolium repens</i> L.) mixture, and a three-species mixture of ARG, RC, and WC. Plots were established in fall 2020 with forage grown until May 2021 and 2022, when plots were strip-tilled and planted with cotton. Cotton was managed with minimal herbicide use to preserve perennial clovers. Results indicated WC was more persistent than RC (&gt;40 plants m<sup>−2</sup> vs. &lt;40 plants m<sup>−2</sup>), and the presence of perennial clovers suppressed weeds at similar levels to the ARG monoculture (35 weeds m<sup>−2</sup>) during the second spring. Perennial clovers grew taller (4–5 cm) when mixed with ARG. The presence of clovers mixed with ARG during the second spring reduced acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentration and increased crude protein (CP) concentration (280 g ADF kg<sup>−1</sup>; 167 g CP kg<sup>−1</sup>) compared to the ARG monoculture (315 g ADF kg<sup>−1</sup>; 126 g CP kg<sup>−1</sup>). Benefits of intercropping perennial forages with cotton were maximized during the second year of growth, but future work is necessary to improve stand survival.</p>","PeriodicalId":7522,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy Journal","volume":"116 5","pages":"2411-2426"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agj2.21625","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Integrated forage–row cropping systems provide important agronomic and economic benefits to producers. However, little attention has been given to incorporating forages into row crop systems unique to the southeastern United States. This study assessed the viability of intercropping cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) on perennial, cool-season legumes during the summer months in the Southeast Coastal Plain over two production years. Treatments included a weedy fallow, annual ryegrass (ARG; Lolium multiflorum Lam.) monoculture, a red clover (RC; Trifolium pratense L.) and white clover (WC; Trifolium repens L.) mixture, and a three-species mixture of ARG, RC, and WC. Plots were established in fall 2020 with forage grown until May 2021 and 2022, when plots were strip-tilled and planted with cotton. Cotton was managed with minimal herbicide use to preserve perennial clovers. Results indicated WC was more persistent than RC (>40 plants m−2 vs. <40 plants m−2), and the presence of perennial clovers suppressed weeds at similar levels to the ARG monoculture (35 weeds m−2) during the second spring. Perennial clovers grew taller (4–5 cm) when mixed with ARG. The presence of clovers mixed with ARG during the second spring reduced acid detergent fiber (ADF) concentration and increased crude protein (CP) concentration (280 g ADF kg−1; 167 g CP kg−1) compared to the ARG monoculture (315 g ADF kg−1; 126 g CP kg−1). Benefits of intercropping perennial forages with cotton were maximized during the second year of growth, but future work is necessary to improve stand survival.

评估棉花间作对美国东南部冷季型多年生牧草持久性、牧草质量和营养价值的影响
牧草-连作系统为生产者带来了重要的农艺和经济效益。然而,在美国东南部地区,很少有人关注将牧草纳入连作系统的问题。这项研究评估了在东南沿海平原的两个生产年中,在夏季棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L. )与多年生冷季豆科植物间作的可行性。处理方式包括杂草休耕、一年生黑麦草(ARG;Lolium multiflorum Lam.)单作、红三叶(RC;Trifolium pratense L.)和白三叶(WC;Trifolium repens L.)混作,以及 ARG、RC 和 WC 三种混作。地块于 2020 年秋季建立,在 2021 年和 2022 年 5 月之前种植牧草,之后对地块进行条耕并种植棉花。棉花管理中尽量少用除草剂,以保护多年生三叶草。结果表明,WC 比 RC 更持久(>40 株 m-2 对 <40株 m-2),在第二年春季,多年生三叶草对杂草的抑制水平与 ARG 单一种植(35 株杂草 m-2)相似。多年生三叶草与 ARG 混合后长得更高(4-5 厘米)。与 ARG 单作(315 g ADF kg-1;126 g CP kg-1)相比,在第二年春季三叶草与 ARG 混种降低了酸性洗涤纤维(ADF)浓度,增加了粗蛋白(CP)浓度(280 g ADF kg-1;167 g CP kg-1)。在棉花生长的第二年,多年生牧草与棉花间作的效益最大化,但今后仍需努力提高棉花的存活率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agronomy Journal
Agronomy Journal 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
9.50%
发文量
265
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: After critical review and approval by the editorial board, AJ publishes articles reporting research findings in soil–plant relationships; crop science; soil science; biometry; crop, soil, pasture, and range management; crop, forage, and pasture production and utilization; turfgrass; agroclimatology; agronomic models; integrated pest management; integrated agricultural systems; and various aspects of entomology, weed science, animal science, plant pathology, and agricultural economics as applied to production agriculture. Notes are published about apparatus, observations, and experimental techniques. Observations usually are limited to studies and reports of unrepeatable phenomena or other unique circumstances. Review and interpretation papers are also published, subject to standard review. Contributions to the Forum section deal with current agronomic issues and questions in brief, thought-provoking form. Such papers are reviewed by the editor in consultation with the editorial board.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信