Flushing out homeowner perceptions to improve voluntary septic to sewer conversion with social marketing

IF 2.3 Q3 BUSINESS
Lisa S. Krimsky, Laura A. Warner, Shelli D. Rampold
{"title":"Flushing out homeowner perceptions to improve voluntary septic to sewer conversion with social marketing","authors":"Lisa S. Krimsky, Laura A. Warner, Shelli D. Rampold","doi":"10.1177/15245004241262030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundSeptic systems are recognized as a contributor to water quality degradation. Septic to sewer conversion programs are being implemented to mitigate nutrient pollution but success of voluntary programs is dependent on homeowner participation. The purpose of this study was to identify elements of potential social marketing strategies that could advance the voluntary adoption of septic to sewer conversion programs.Focus of the ArticleThis study used formative survey research to assess residents’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceived benefits of and barriers to septic systems conversion in Florida, USA to inform future interventions promoting this major, costly home infrastructure change that reduces wastewater nutrient contamination.Research QuestionThis study attempts to answer the following questions: (1) Does septic system conversion status (mandatory vs. voluntary) influence homeowners’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceived benefits and barriers to septic to sewer conversion? (2) What social marketing variables are the best predictors of attitude about septic to sewer conversion?Importance to the Social Marketing FieldIn contrast to inexpensive, repeated habits which are the target of many social marketing campaigns, costly one-time behaviors have been minimally explored by social scientists and social marketers. This study demonstrates how social marketing research can be applied to advance the adoption of costly, one-time infrastructure improvements, with septic to sewer conversions serving as the study context. There are substantial opportunities for social marketers to support local government and other organizations in their promotion of major technologies, including, but not limited to septic system conversions.Methods518 adult Florida residents who were also septic system owners completed an online survey instrument that assessed subjective and objective knowledge, attitudes about septic to sewer conversion, and motivators and barriers to conversion.ResultsSeptic system homeowners are largely supportive of septic conversion programs; however, the greatest perceived benefits are personal and not associated with environmental improvements. Despite many septic to sewer conversion projects being initiated for environmental purposes, behavior change efforts should promote the benefits of conversion as perceived by the homeowner. The primary barrier is the upfront cost, and alternative funding structures should be investigated.Recommendations for Research or PracticeThis study indicates that target audience outreach is an essential component of the environmental planning process. Considering the costs and complexity of water quality infrastructure projects, environmental management professionals should consider a robust audience-specific social marketing program as part of the implementation and planning process. The findings presented here suggest opportunities for social marketers to partner with environmental management professionals tasked with encouraging septic to sewer conversion or other costly and significant one-time behaviors.","PeriodicalId":46085,"journal":{"name":"Social Marketing Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Marketing Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15245004241262030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSeptic systems are recognized as a contributor to water quality degradation. Septic to sewer conversion programs are being implemented to mitigate nutrient pollution but success of voluntary programs is dependent on homeowner participation. The purpose of this study was to identify elements of potential social marketing strategies that could advance the voluntary adoption of septic to sewer conversion programs.Focus of the ArticleThis study used formative survey research to assess residents’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceived benefits of and barriers to septic systems conversion in Florida, USA to inform future interventions promoting this major, costly home infrastructure change that reduces wastewater nutrient contamination.Research QuestionThis study attempts to answer the following questions: (1) Does septic system conversion status (mandatory vs. voluntary) influence homeowners’ knowledge, attitudes, and perceived benefits and barriers to septic to sewer conversion? (2) What social marketing variables are the best predictors of attitude about septic to sewer conversion?Importance to the Social Marketing FieldIn contrast to inexpensive, repeated habits which are the target of many social marketing campaigns, costly one-time behaviors have been minimally explored by social scientists and social marketers. This study demonstrates how social marketing research can be applied to advance the adoption of costly, one-time infrastructure improvements, with septic to sewer conversions serving as the study context. There are substantial opportunities for social marketers to support local government and other organizations in their promotion of major technologies, including, but not limited to septic system conversions.Methods518 adult Florida residents who were also septic system owners completed an online survey instrument that assessed subjective and objective knowledge, attitudes about septic to sewer conversion, and motivators and barriers to conversion.ResultsSeptic system homeowners are largely supportive of septic conversion programs; however, the greatest perceived benefits are personal and not associated with environmental improvements. Despite many septic to sewer conversion projects being initiated for environmental purposes, behavior change efforts should promote the benefits of conversion as perceived by the homeowner. The primary barrier is the upfront cost, and alternative funding structures should be investigated.Recommendations for Research or PracticeThis study indicates that target audience outreach is an essential component of the environmental planning process. Considering the costs and complexity of water quality infrastructure projects, environmental management professionals should consider a robust audience-specific social marketing program as part of the implementation and planning process. The findings presented here suggest opportunities for social marketers to partner with environmental management professionals tasked with encouraging septic to sewer conversion or other costly and significant one-time behaviors.
了解房主的看法,通过社会营销改善化粪池到下水道的自愿转换
背景化粪池系统被认为是造成水质恶化的一个因素。目前正在实施化粪池到下水道转换计划,以减轻营养物污染,但自愿计划的成功与否取决于房主的参与。本研究的目的是确定潜在社会营销策略的要素,以推动化粪池到下水道转换计划的自愿采用。文章重点本研究使用形成性调查研究来评估美国佛罗里达州居民对化粪池系统转换的认识、态度、感知到的好处和障碍,为未来促进这一重大、昂贵的家庭基础设施改变以减少废水营养物污染的干预措施提供信息。研究问题本研究试图回答以下问题:(1)化粪池系统转换状态(强制与自愿)是否会影响房主对化粪池转换为下水道的认识、态度、感知到的好处和障碍?(2) 哪些社会营销变量是化粪池改下水道态度的最佳预测因素? 对社会营销领域的重要性与许多社会营销活动所针对的廉价、重复的习惯不同,社会科学家和社会营销人员对代价高昂的一次性行为的研究很少。本研究以化粪池改下水道为研究背景,展示了如何将社会营销研究应用于推动成本高昂的一次性基础设施改善。社会营销人员有大量机会支持地方政府和其他组织推广主要技术,包括但不限于化粪池系统改造。方法518 名同时也是化粪池系统所有者的佛罗里达州成年居民完成了一项在线调查,该调查评估了主观和客观知识、对化粪池到下水道改造的态度,以及改造的动机和障碍。结果化粪池系统所有者大多支持化粪池改造项目;然而,他们认为最大的好处是个人利益,而与环境改善无关。尽管许多化粪池到下水道转换项目是出于环保目的而启动的,但行为改变工作应促进业主认识到转换的益处。本研究表明,目标受众宣传是环境规划过程的重要组成部分。考虑到水质基础设施项目的成本和复杂性,环境管理专业人员应将针对特定受众的强大社会营销计划作为实施和规划过程的一部分。本文的研究结果为社会营销人员提供了与环境管理专业人员合作的机会,他们的任务是鼓励将化粪池改造成下水道,或鼓励其他昂贵而重要的一次性行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信