This must be the place: local amenities and superstars’ wages

IF 1.9 4区经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS

Empirical Economics Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1007/s00181-024-02640-w

Mattia Filomena, Francesco Principe

引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigate the role of local amenities in shaping compensating wage differentials in labor market populated by high-skilled workers. Using 10 years of longitudinal data on workers productivity along with information on firms and location amenities, we evaluate whether workers are willing to pay to join a better firm and if firms with undesirable attributes must provide higher wages to attract workers. By accounting for unobserved workers heterogeneity, we show that superstars receive positive wage differentials for lower location amenities as well as riskier employments.

Abstract Image

查看原文本刊更多论文

一定是这里：当地的便利设施和超级巨星的工资

我们研究了当地的便利设施在形成高技能工人劳动力市场补偿性工资差异中的作用。利用 10 年的工人生产率纵向数据以及企业和当地便利设施信息，我们评估了工人是否愿意为加入更好的企业而付出代价，以及具有不良属性的企业是否必须提供更高的工资来吸引工人。通过考虑未观察到的工人异质性，我们发现超级明星会因为较低的区位设施和较高的就业风险而获得正工资差异。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Empirical Economics Multiple-

CiteScore

4.40

自引率

0.00%

发文量

157

期刊介绍： Empirical Economics publishes high quality papers using econometric or statistical methods to fill the gap between economic theory and observed data. Papers explore such topics as estimation of established relationships between economic variables, testing of hypotheses derived from economic theory, treatment effect estimation, policy evaluation, simulation, forecasting, as well as econometric methods and measurement. Empirical Economics emphasizes the replicability of empirical results. Replication studies of important results in the literature - both positive and negative results - may be published as short papers in Empirical Economics. Authors of all accepted papers and replications are required to submit all data and codes prior to publication (for more details, see: Instructions for Authors).The journal follows a single blind review procedure. In order to ensure the high quality of the journal and an efficient editorial process, a substantial number of submissions that have very poor chances of receiving positive reviews are routinely rejected without sending the papers for review.Officially cited as: Empir Econ