Drive-by scour damage detection in railway bridges using deep autoencoder and different sensor placement strategies

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Thiago Fernandes, Rafael Lopez, Diogo Ribeiro
{"title":"Drive-by scour damage detection in railway bridges using deep autoencoder and different sensor placement strategies","authors":"Thiago Fernandes, Rafael Lopez, Diogo Ribeiro","doi":"10.1007/s13349-024-00821-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Foundation scour is a critical phenomenon that may lead to the collapse of railway bridges. This issue is even more concerning in the current scenario where extreme weather events, such as floods, are becoming more severe and recurrent. Among different methodologies for assessing the structural integrity of railway bridges, vehicle-assisted monitoring has emerged as promising due to its low-cost and straightforward sensor installation compared to direct instrumentation of bridges. This paper provides a proof of concept of employing vehicle acceleration measurements from passing trains to detect the occurrence of bridge scour. To assess the effectiveness of accelerometer placement in data acquisition, vertical acceleration responses are collected from various positions throughout the vehicle and for different vehicles in the train, considering operational variabilities and measurement noise. A deep autoencoder model is used to process raw acceleration measurements collected during multiple train passages over a bridge affected by scour, where the scour damage is simulated as a local reduction in stiffness within a specific pier-foundation system. The difference between model-based and vehicle responses obtained from various observed events is the prediction error evaluated by the mean absolute error. The Kullback–Leibler divergence-based damage index is proposed to assess the number of vehicle-crossing events required to infer the damage. Finally, the approach’s accuracy is evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. The results demonstrate that the applied methodology is highly effective in detecting both 5% and 10% levels of scour damage for sensors placed on the front and rear bogies of the first and last vehicles, without any prior data preprocessing.</p>","PeriodicalId":48582,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13349-024-00821-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Foundation scour is a critical phenomenon that may lead to the collapse of railway bridges. This issue is even more concerning in the current scenario where extreme weather events, such as floods, are becoming more severe and recurrent. Among different methodologies for assessing the structural integrity of railway bridges, vehicle-assisted monitoring has emerged as promising due to its low-cost and straightforward sensor installation compared to direct instrumentation of bridges. This paper provides a proof of concept of employing vehicle acceleration measurements from passing trains to detect the occurrence of bridge scour. To assess the effectiveness of accelerometer placement in data acquisition, vertical acceleration responses are collected from various positions throughout the vehicle and for different vehicles in the train, considering operational variabilities and measurement noise. A deep autoencoder model is used to process raw acceleration measurements collected during multiple train passages over a bridge affected by scour, where the scour damage is simulated as a local reduction in stiffness within a specific pier-foundation system. The difference between model-based and vehicle responses obtained from various observed events is the prediction error evaluated by the mean absolute error. The Kullback–Leibler divergence-based damage index is proposed to assess the number of vehicle-crossing events required to infer the damage. Finally, the approach’s accuracy is evaluated using Receiver Operating Characteristic curves. The results demonstrate that the applied methodology is highly effective in detecting both 5% and 10% levels of scour damage for sensors placed on the front and rear bogies of the first and last vehicles, without any prior data preprocessing.

Abstract Image

利用深度自动编码器和不同的传感器布置策略检测铁路桥梁的驱动冲刷损伤
地基冲刷是可能导致铁路桥梁坍塌的一个关键现象。在当前情况下,洪水等极端天气事件正变得越来越严重和频繁,这个问题就更加令人担忧。在评估铁路桥梁结构完整性的各种方法中,车辆辅助监测因其低成本和直接安装传感器而比直接安装桥梁仪器更有前途。本文提供了利用过往列车的车辆加速度测量来检测桥梁冲刷发生情况的概念验证。为了评估加速度计位置在数据采集中的有效性,考虑到运行变异和测量噪声,从整个车辆的不同位置和列车中的不同车辆收集垂直加速度响应。使用深度自动编码器模型来处理在列车多次通过受冲刷影响的桥梁时收集到的原始加速度测量值,其中冲刷破坏被模拟为特定桥墩基础系统内刚度的局部降低。通过各种观测事件获得的基于模型的车辆响应与基于模型的车辆响应之间的差异,就是用平均绝对误差评估的预测误差。提出了基于 Kullback-Leibler 发散的损坏指数,以评估推断损坏所需的车辆穿越事件数量。最后,利用接收器工作特性曲线对该方法的准确性进行了评估。结果表明,对于放置在第一辆和最后一辆车前后转向架上的传感器,所应用的方法能非常有效地检测出 5%和 10%级别的冲刷损坏,而无需事先进行任何数据预处理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring
Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring Engineering-Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.40%
发文量
105
期刊介绍: The Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring (JCSHM) publishes articles to advance the understanding and the application of health monitoring methods for the condition assessment and management of civil infrastructure systems. JCSHM serves as a focal point for sharing knowledge and experience in technologies impacting the discipline of Civionics and Civil Structural Health Monitoring, especially in terms of load capacity ratings and service life estimation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信