Color representations of normals and congenital red–green color deficiencies based on differential scaling of color‐names and color‐naming experiments

IF 1.2 3区 工程技术 Q4 CHEMISTRY, APPLIED
Minoru Ohkoba, Tomoharu Ishikawa, Kota Kanari, Shoko Hira, Sakuichi Ohtsuka, Miyoshi Ayama
{"title":"Color representations of normals and congenital red–green color deficiencies based on differential scaling of color‐names and color‐naming experiments","authors":"Minoru Ohkoba, Tomoharu Ishikawa, Kota Kanari, Shoko Hira, Sakuichi Ohtsuka, Miyoshi Ayama","doi":"10.1002/col.22944","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our previous work revealed that the vision‐based color representation of congenitally color‐deficient observers (CDOs) was mostly C‐shaped bending at yellow and blue that differed from circular shape of the observers with no color vision deficiencies called CNOs in the study. In this study, the color‐name‐based internal color representation was investigated for the same observers and its relation to the vision‐based color representation was examined. First, psychological difference of all combinations of 10 color names corresponding to the Munsell basic hues was rated using a 5‐point scale. The distances of all pairs of CNOs and the CDOs agreed well with each other, in contrast to the distinctive differences in the vision‐based color representation. Second, color‐naming was conducted to the 10 color chips for each of high and medium chroma to link the vision‐based and color‐name‐based representations through the test stimuli. For the high chroma chips, color naming property of the CDOs was similar to that of the CNOs. In contrast, CDOs showed distinctively larger intra‐ and inter‐observer variabilities than CNOs for the medium chroma chips. The difference between two color chips was estimated using the results of the color naming and extended color‐name difference ratings which is called “color‐naming difference.” No systematic relationship was observed among the color‐chip difference, color‐name difference, and color naming difference in individual comparisons. It indicated that the color‐naming difference is greater for the pairs including YR/Y/GY versus G/B, and vice versa for the pairs consisting of BG, B, PB, P, and RP. These suggest the followings; first, CDOs seem to utilize lightness difference strategically in the visual assessment, second, psychological differences among “blue,” “green,” “purple,” or “gray” are distinct for CDOs although the color chips given those names in our experiment appear close.","PeriodicalId":10459,"journal":{"name":"Color Research and Application","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Color Research and Application","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/col.22944","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Our previous work revealed that the vision‐based color representation of congenitally color‐deficient observers (CDOs) was mostly C‐shaped bending at yellow and blue that differed from circular shape of the observers with no color vision deficiencies called CNOs in the study. In this study, the color‐name‐based internal color representation was investigated for the same observers and its relation to the vision‐based color representation was examined. First, psychological difference of all combinations of 10 color names corresponding to the Munsell basic hues was rated using a 5‐point scale. The distances of all pairs of CNOs and the CDOs agreed well with each other, in contrast to the distinctive differences in the vision‐based color representation. Second, color‐naming was conducted to the 10 color chips for each of high and medium chroma to link the vision‐based and color‐name‐based representations through the test stimuli. For the high chroma chips, color naming property of the CDOs was similar to that of the CNOs. In contrast, CDOs showed distinctively larger intra‐ and inter‐observer variabilities than CNOs for the medium chroma chips. The difference between two color chips was estimated using the results of the color naming and extended color‐name difference ratings which is called “color‐naming difference.” No systematic relationship was observed among the color‐chip difference, color‐name difference, and color naming difference in individual comparisons. It indicated that the color‐naming difference is greater for the pairs including YR/Y/GY versus G/B, and vice versa for the pairs consisting of BG, B, PB, P, and RP. These suggest the followings; first, CDOs seem to utilize lightness difference strategically in the visual assessment, second, psychological differences among “blue,” “green,” “purple,” or “gray” are distinct for CDOs although the color chips given those names in our experiment appear close.
基于色名差异缩放和颜色命名实验的正常人和先天性红绿颜色缺陷者的颜色表征
我们之前的研究发现,先天性色觉缺陷观察者(CDOs)基于视觉的颜色表征大多是在黄色和蓝色处弯曲的 C 形,这与研究中被称为 CNOs 的无色觉缺陷观察者的圆形不同。本研究调查了同一观察者基于颜色名称的内部颜色表征,并考察了其与基于视觉的颜色表征之间的关系。首先,用 5 分制对与蒙赛尔基本色调相对应的 10 个颜色名称的所有组合的心理差异进行评分。所有成对的 CNO 和 CDO 的距离都非常接近,这与视觉色彩表征的明显差异形成了鲜明对比。其次,对高、中色度的 10 个色块分别进行了颜色命名,以通过测试刺激将视觉表征和颜色命名表征联系起来。对于高色度芯片,CDOs 的颜色命名特性与 CNOs 相似。相比之下,对于中等色度芯片,CDO 的观察者内部和观察者之间的差异明显大于 CNO。两个颜色芯片之间的差异是通过颜色命名和扩展颜色命名差异评级的结果估算出来的,称为 "颜色命名差异"。在个别比较中,没有观察到色片差异、色名差异和色名差异之间有系统的关系。结果表明,YR/Y/GY 与 G/B 对比色片差异更大,BG、B、PB、P 和 RP 对比色片差异也更大。这表明:第一,CDO 似乎在视觉评估中战略性地利用了明度差异;第二,尽管在我们的实验中被命名为 "蓝色"、"绿色"、"紫色 "或 "灰色 "的色块看起来很接近,但对 CDO 而言,"蓝色"、"绿色"、"紫色 "或 "灰色 "之间的心理差异是明显的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Color Research and Application
Color Research and Application 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
7.10%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Color Research and Application provides a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed research reviews, original research articles, and editorials of the highest quality on the science, technology, and application of color in multiple disciplines. Due to the highly interdisciplinary influence of color, the readership of the journal is similarly widespread and includes those in business, art, design, education, as well as various industries.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信