Responsible inclusion: A systematic review of consent to social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability in the US

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
{"title":"Responsible inclusion: A systematic review of consent to social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability in the US","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2024.101669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>In recognition of their status as a health disparities population, there is growing emphasis on conducting research inclusive of adults with intellectual disability to generate new knowledge and opportunities to improve health and equity. Yet they are often excluded from research, and human research participant protection experts and researchers lack agreement on effective consent protocols for their inclusion.</p></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><p>We sought to identify approaches to consent in US-based social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We conducted a systematic review on approaches to self-consent with adults with intellectual disability published between 2009 and 2023, identified via searching eight databases and reference list hand searches. We identified 13 manuscripts and conducted a thematic analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Our analysis identified themes related to guiding principles, strategies to enhance informed and voluntary consent, approaches to consent capacity, involving individuals subject to guardianship, and strategies for expressing decisions and enhancing ongoing decisions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Manuscripts largely reflected an emphasis on identifying approaches to consent that reflect disability rights principles to promote the right to be included and make one's own decisions based on assessment of relevant information, risks and benefits, and to employ reasonable modifications to achieve inclusion. To avoid the risks of exclusion and advance the responsible inclusion of adults with intellectual disability, we make recommendations to align consent approaches anchored in contemporary thinking about human research participant protections, including through integration with disability rights.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":"17 4","pages":"Article 101669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1936657424001080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

In recognition of their status as a health disparities population, there is growing emphasis on conducting research inclusive of adults with intellectual disability to generate new knowledge and opportunities to improve health and equity. Yet they are often excluded from research, and human research participant protection experts and researchers lack agreement on effective consent protocols for their inclusion.

Objective

We sought to identify approaches to consent in US-based social-behavioral research with adults with intellectual disability.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review on approaches to self-consent with adults with intellectual disability published between 2009 and 2023, identified via searching eight databases and reference list hand searches. We identified 13 manuscripts and conducted a thematic analysis.

Results

Our analysis identified themes related to guiding principles, strategies to enhance informed and voluntary consent, approaches to consent capacity, involving individuals subject to guardianship, and strategies for expressing decisions and enhancing ongoing decisions.

Conclusions

Manuscripts largely reflected an emphasis on identifying approaches to consent that reflect disability rights principles to promote the right to be included and make one's own decisions based on assessment of relevant information, risks and benefits, and to employ reasonable modifications to achieve inclusion. To avoid the risks of exclusion and advance the responsible inclusion of adults with intellectual disability, we make recommendations to align consent approaches anchored in contemporary thinking about human research participant protections, including through integration with disability rights.

负责任的包容:对美国智障成人社会行为研究同意书的系统回顾。
背景:由于认识到智障成人在健康方面的不平等地位,人们越来越重视开展包括智障成人在内的研究,以产生新的知识和机会,改善健康和公平状况。然而,他们往往被排除在研究之外,人类研究参与者保护专家和研究人员对纳入他们的有效同意协议缺乏共识:我们试图找出美国智障成人社会行为研究中的同意方法:我们对 2009 年至 2023 年间发表的智障成人自我同意方法进行了系统性综述,这些方法是通过搜索 8 个数据库和参考文献列表手动搜索确定的。我们确定了 13 篇手稿,并进行了主题分析:我们的分析确定了与指导原则、加强知情和自愿同意的策略、同意能力的方法、受监护者的参与以及表达决定和加强持续决定的策略有关的主题:手稿主要反映了对确定同意方法的重视,这些方法反映了残疾人权利原则,以促进被包容的权利,并在评估相关信息、风险和益处的基础上做出自己的决定,以及采用合理的修改以实现包容。为了避免排斥的风险,并推动以负责任的方式纳入成年智障人士,我们提出了一些建议,以调整基于当代人类研究参与者保护思想的同意方式,包括通过与残疾人权利相结合的方式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信