Does Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage for Physical Therapy Visits for Common Orthopedic Diagnoses? A Survey Study.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kaitlin Pyrz, Mathew Hargreaves, Audria Wood, Abdias Girardi, Gerald McGwin, Justin Kirk, Bolton Patton, Aaron Casp, Amit Momaya
{"title":"Does Insurance Provide Adequate Coverage for Physical Therapy Visits for Common Orthopedic Diagnoses? A Survey Study.","authors":"Kaitlin Pyrz, Mathew Hargreaves, Audria Wood, Abdias Girardi, Gerald McGwin, Justin Kirk, Bolton Patton, Aaron Casp, Amit Momaya","doi":"10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001707","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to analyze the association between physical therapists' recommended number of visits for a full recovery from common orthopedic injuries/surgeries and the extent of insurance coverage for these visits.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted with board-certified physical therapists. A qualitative questionnaire was used to gather physical therapists' demographics and the recommended number of physical therapy visits to achieve a full recovery after 11 common orthopedic diagnoses. Physical therapists also were asked to report whether they believe that insurance provides an adequate number of visits overall. In addition to the qualitative survey, insurance coverage details of major Alabama companies were obtained for comparison. Descriptive statistics of the participating therapists were analyzed for sex, age, degree/training, and years of experience. Kruskal-Wallis statistics were used to analyze variance between the aforementioned groupings when compared with the reported average number of sessions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey (N = 251) collected data on the average number of physical therapy sessions that are necessary for a complete recovery as recommended by physical therapists for 11 common orthopedic diagnoses. From this survey, the average number of necessary visits ranged from 11.3 visits (ankle sprains) to 37.3 visits (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction), with the overall average number of visits being 23.8. Only 24% of physical therapists believed that insurance companies provided enough coverage. Insurance coverage varied but often required additional procedures to allocate the adequate number of visits for the studied orthopedic pathologies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The majority of practicing physical therapists in Alabama perceive insufficient insurance coverage for physical therapy visits for most orthopedic diagnoses. This study has implications for healthcare decision making and patient-centered rehabilitation goals. Physicians and physical therapists can use this information to optimize treatment decisions and rehabilitation goals. Patients will benefit from improved physical and economic well-being. This study has the potential to drive further research and influence national insurance policies to better serve patients' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":22043,"journal":{"name":"Southern Medical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Southern Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001707","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to analyze the association between physical therapists' recommended number of visits for a full recovery from common orthopedic injuries/surgeries and the extent of insurance coverage for these visits.

Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with board-certified physical therapists. A qualitative questionnaire was used to gather physical therapists' demographics and the recommended number of physical therapy visits to achieve a full recovery after 11 common orthopedic diagnoses. Physical therapists also were asked to report whether they believe that insurance provides an adequate number of visits overall. In addition to the qualitative survey, insurance coverage details of major Alabama companies were obtained for comparison. Descriptive statistics of the participating therapists were analyzed for sex, age, degree/training, and years of experience. Kruskal-Wallis statistics were used to analyze variance between the aforementioned groupings when compared with the reported average number of sessions.

Results: The survey (N = 251) collected data on the average number of physical therapy sessions that are necessary for a complete recovery as recommended by physical therapists for 11 common orthopedic diagnoses. From this survey, the average number of necessary visits ranged from 11.3 visits (ankle sprains) to 37.3 visits (anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction), with the overall average number of visits being 23.8. Only 24% of physical therapists believed that insurance companies provided enough coverage. Insurance coverage varied but often required additional procedures to allocate the adequate number of visits for the studied orthopedic pathologies.

Conclusions: The majority of practicing physical therapists in Alabama perceive insufficient insurance coverage for physical therapy visits for most orthopedic diagnoses. This study has implications for healthcare decision making and patient-centered rehabilitation goals. Physicians and physical therapists can use this information to optimize treatment decisions and rehabilitation goals. Patients will benefit from improved physical and economic well-being. This study has the potential to drive further research and influence national insurance policies to better serve patients' needs.

保险是否为常见骨科诊断的物理治疗就诊提供足够的承保范围?一项调查研究。
研究目的本研究旨在分析物理治疗师建议的常见骨科损伤/手术后完全康复的就诊次数与这些就诊的保险范围之间的关联:一项前瞻性观察研究的研究对象是经委员会认证的物理治疗师。研究采用定性问卷调查的方式,收集了理疗师的人口统计数据,以及在 11 种常见骨科诊断后,为实现完全康复而建议的理疗次数。此外,还要求理疗师报告他们是否认为保险提供的就诊次数总体上是足够的。除定性调查外,我们还获得了阿拉巴马州主要公司的保险覆盖详情,以便进行比较。对参与调查的理疗师的性别、年龄、学位/培训和工作年限进行了描述性统计分析。Kruskal-Wallis 统计法用于分析上述分组与报告的平均治疗次数之间的差异:调查(N = 251)收集了理疗师针对 11 种常见骨科诊断建议的完全康复所需的平均理疗次数数据。调查显示,必要的平均治疗次数从 11.3 次(踝关节扭伤)到 37.3 次(前交叉韧带重建)不等,总体平均治疗次数为 23.8 次。只有 24% 的理疗师认为保险公司提供了足够的承保范围。保险范围各不相同,但往往需要额外的程序才能为所研究的骨科病症分配足够的就诊次数:结论:阿拉巴马州的大多数执业理疗师认为,大多数骨科诊断的理疗次数没有足够的保险保障。这项研究对医疗决策和以患者为中心的康复目标具有重要意义。医生和理疗师可以利用这些信息来优化治疗决策和康复目标。患者将受益于身体和经济状况的改善。这项研究有可能推动进一步的研究并影响国家保险政策,从而更好地满足患者的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Southern Medical Journal
Southern Medical Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
9.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: As the official journal of the Birmingham, Alabama-based Southern Medical Association (SMA), the Southern Medical Journal (SMJ) has for more than 100 years provided the latest clinical information in areas that affect patients'' daily lives. Now delivered to individuals exclusively online, the SMJ has a multidisciplinary focus that covers a broad range of topics relevant to physicians and other healthcare specialists in all relevant aspects of the profession, including medicine and medical specialties, surgery and surgery specialties; child and maternal health; mental health; emergency and disaster medicine; public health and environmental medicine; bioethics and medical education; and quality health care, patient safety, and best practices. Each month, articles span the spectrum of medical topics, providing timely, up-to-the-minute information for both primary care physicians and specialists. Contributors include leaders in the healthcare field from across the country and around the world. The SMJ enables physicians to provide the best possible care to patients in this age of rapidly changing modern medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信