Reliability and Validity of a Tablet-Based Neuropsychological Test (the Hellocog) for Screening Dementia.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Psychiatry Investigation Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.30773/pi.2023.0388
Daniel Hahnsam Seok, Hee Won Yang, Ji Won Han, Jin Hwan Lim, Seon Hyeok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Ki Woong Kim
{"title":"Reliability and Validity of a Tablet-Based Neuropsychological Test (the Hellocog) for Screening Dementia.","authors":"Daniel Hahnsam Seok, Hee Won Yang, Ji Won Han, Jin Hwan Lim, Seon Hyeok Kim, Eun Young Kim, Ki Woong Kim","doi":"10.30773/pi.2023.0388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To address the gap in timely diagnosis of dementia due to limited screening tools, we investigated the validity and reliability of the Hellocog, computerized neuropsychological test based on tablets for screening dementia. The higher the probability score on the Hellocog, the higher the likelihood of dementia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 100 patients with dementia and 100 individuals with normal cognition who were aged 60 years or older and free of other major psychiatric, neurological, or medical conditions. They administered the Hellocog on a tablet under the supervision of a neuropsychologist. To determine test-retest reliability, 20 took the Hellocog again after 4 weeks. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Hellocog showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.69) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.86, p<0.001). Participants with dementia scored higher on the Hellocog than those with normal cognition (p<0.001), confirming its high criterion validity. Strong correlations with the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score and the total score of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-TS) highlight the concurrent validity of the Hellocog. The area under the ROC curve for dementia of the Hellocog was excellent (0.971) and comparable to that of the MMSE and CERAD-TS. The sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 0.945 and 0.872%, respectively, which were slightly better than those of the MMSE and CERAD-TS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Hellocog stands out as a valid and reliable tool for self-administered dementia screening, with promise for improving early detection of dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":21164,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry Investigation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11222082/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2023.0388","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To address the gap in timely diagnosis of dementia due to limited screening tools, we investigated the validity and reliability of the Hellocog, computerized neuropsychological test based on tablets for screening dementia. The higher the probability score on the Hellocog, the higher the likelihood of dementia.

Methods: This study included 100 patients with dementia and 100 individuals with normal cognition who were aged 60 years or older and free of other major psychiatric, neurological, or medical conditions. They administered the Hellocog on a tablet under the supervision of a neuropsychologist. To determine test-retest reliability, 20 took the Hellocog again after 4 weeks. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis.

Results: The Hellocog showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha=0.69) and good test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.86, p<0.001). Participants with dementia scored higher on the Hellocog than those with normal cognition (p<0.001), confirming its high criterion validity. Strong correlations with the Mini-Mental Status Examination (MMSE) score and the total score of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease Neuropsychological Assessment Battery (CERAD-TS) highlight the concurrent validity of the Hellocog. The area under the ROC curve for dementia of the Hellocog was excellent (0.971) and comparable to that of the MMSE and CERAD-TS. The sensitivity and specificity for dementia were 0.945 and 0.872%, respectively, which were slightly better than those of the MMSE and CERAD-TS.

Conclusion: Hellocog stands out as a valid and reliable tool for self-administered dementia screening, with promise for improving early detection of dementia.

基于平板电脑的神经心理学测试(Hellocog)用于筛查痴呆症的可靠性和有效性。
目的为了解决因筛查工具有限而导致的痴呆症无法及时诊断的问题,我们研究了基于平板电脑的计算机化神经心理测试 Hellocog 的有效性和可靠性,以筛查痴呆症。Hellocog的概率得分越高,患痴呆症的可能性就越大:这项研究包括 100 名痴呆症患者和 100 名认知能力正常的人,他们的年龄都在 60 岁或 60 岁以上,没有其他主要的精神、神经或内科疾病。他们在神经心理学家的指导下使用平板电脑进行 Hellocog 测试。为了确定重测可靠性,20 人在 4 周后再次进行了 Hellocog 测试。结果显示,Hellocog具有足够的内部一致性:结果:Hellocog显示出足够的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha=0.69)和良好的测试-再测可靠性(类内相关系数=0.86,pConclusion):Hellocog 是一种有效、可靠的自测痴呆症筛查工具,有望改善痴呆症的早期发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
3.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Psychiatry Investigation is published on the 25th day of every month in English by the Korean Neuropsychiatric Association (KNPA). The Journal covers the whole range of psychiatry and neuroscience. Both basic and clinical contributions are encouraged from all disciplines and research areas relevant to the pathophysiology and management of neuropsychiatric disorders and symptoms, as well as researches related to cross cultural psychiatry and ethnic issues in psychiatry. The Journal publishes editorials, review articles, original articles, brief reports, viewpoints and correspondences. All research articles are peer reviewed. Contributions are accepted for publication on the condition that their substance has not been published or submitted for publication elsewhere. Authors submitting papers to the Journal (serially or otherwise) with a common theme or using data derived from the same sample (or a subset thereof) must send details of all relevant previous publications and simultaneous submissions. The Journal is not responsible for statements made by contributors. Material in the Journal does not necessarily reflect the views of the Editor or of the KNPA. Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy-edited to improve readability and to ensure conformity with house style.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信