{"title":"Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An <i>In Vitro</i> Study.","authors":"AlWaleed Abushanan","doi":"10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>The aim of the current study was to assess the cleaning and smear layer removal efficacy of two different rotary files with or without chemical agents on primary teeth.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>For the study, 90 extracted primary maxillary incisors without internal or external resorption and with at least two-thirds of complete roots were chosen. Then, based on the kind of instruments used to clean and shape the canals, they were randomly assigned to three experimental groups, each consisting of 30 teeth. Group-I: The canal was instrumented manually with K-files, Group-II: The canal was instrumented with Kedo-S files, Group-III: The canal was instrumented with Kedo-SG Blue files. After the canals were finally instrumented, 2 mL of QMix<sup>TM</sup> solution was used to irrigate 15 samples from each group. The samples were subsequently allowed to remain in the canals for 90 seconds in order to eliminate the smear layer. After that a stereomicroscope was used to assess the cleaning effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>With irrigant solution, the highest mean value was found in manual K-files (2.86 ± 0.34), followed by Kedo-S files group (1.34 ± 0.26) and Kedo-SG Blue files (1.28 ± 0.18). Without irrigant solution, the highest mean value was found in manual K-files (2.92 ± 0.22) followed by Kedo-S files group (1.44 ± 0.18) and Kedo-SG Blue files (1.36 ± 0.14). There was a statistically significant difference found at all the three levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>On conclusion, the current study's findings demonstrated that irrigation solution was significantly more effective in cleaning and removing smear layers from pediatric rotary files than manual K-files.</p><p><strong>Clinical significance: </strong>The effectiveness of endodontic therapy depends on a successful chemomechanical preparation. The canals are instrumented using either hand files or rotary instruments; there are several irrigation and instrumentation techniques. In order to completely sterilize the canals, chemical agents are utilized for irrigation during instrumentation. Due to their numerous biological, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant qualities, many natural compounds are also utilized as irrigants. How to cite this article: Abushanan A. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):354-357.</p>","PeriodicalId":35792,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","volume":"25 4","pages":"354-357"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Aim: The aim of the current study was to assess the cleaning and smear layer removal efficacy of two different rotary files with or without chemical agents on primary teeth.
Materials and methods: For the study, 90 extracted primary maxillary incisors without internal or external resorption and with at least two-thirds of complete roots were chosen. Then, based on the kind of instruments used to clean and shape the canals, they were randomly assigned to three experimental groups, each consisting of 30 teeth. Group-I: The canal was instrumented manually with K-files, Group-II: The canal was instrumented with Kedo-S files, Group-III: The canal was instrumented with Kedo-SG Blue files. After the canals were finally instrumented, 2 mL of QMixTM solution was used to irrigate 15 samples from each group. The samples were subsequently allowed to remain in the canals for 90 seconds in order to eliminate the smear layer. After that a stereomicroscope was used to assess the cleaning effectiveness.
Results: With irrigant solution, the highest mean value was found in manual K-files (2.86 ± 0.34), followed by Kedo-S files group (1.34 ± 0.26) and Kedo-SG Blue files (1.28 ± 0.18). Without irrigant solution, the highest mean value was found in manual K-files (2.92 ± 0.22) followed by Kedo-S files group (1.44 ± 0.18) and Kedo-SG Blue files (1.36 ± 0.14). There was a statistically significant difference found at all the three levels.
Conclusion: On conclusion, the current study's findings demonstrated that irrigation solution was significantly more effective in cleaning and removing smear layers from pediatric rotary files than manual K-files.
Clinical significance: The effectiveness of endodontic therapy depends on a successful chemomechanical preparation. The canals are instrumented using either hand files or rotary instruments; there are several irrigation and instrumentation techniques. In order to completely sterilize the canals, chemical agents are utilized for irrigation during instrumentation. Due to their numerous biological, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and antioxidant qualities, many natural compounds are also utilized as irrigants. How to cite this article: Abushanan A. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Ability of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth: An In Vitro Study. J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):354-357.
目的:本研究旨在评估两种不同的旋转锉(含或不含化学制剂)对基牙的清洁和去污效果:研究选择了 90 颗拔出的上颌原切牙,这些牙齿没有内外吸收,且至少有三分之二的完整牙根。然后,根据清洁和塑造牙管所用器械的种类,将它们随机分配到三个实验组,每组 30 颗牙齿。第一组:使用 K 型锉对牙根管进行手动器械操作;第二组:使用 Kedo-S 型锉对牙根管进行器械操作;第三组:使用 Kedo-SG Blue 型锉对牙根管进行器械操作。最后,在对根管进行器械操作后,用 2 毫升 QMixTM 溶液对每组的 15 个样本进行灌洗。然后让样本在根管内停留 90 秒,以消除涂抹层。然后使用体视显微镜评估清洁效果:使用冲洗液时,手动 K 型锉的平均值最高(2.86 ± 0.34),其次是 Kedo-S 型锉组(1.34 ± 0.26)和 Kedo-SG 蓝色锉(1.28 ± 0.18)。在不使用冲洗液的情况下,手动 K 型锉的平均值最高(2.92 ± 0.22),其次是 Kedo-S 型锉组(1.44 ± 0.18)和 Kedo-SG Blue 型锉(1.36 ± 0.14)。所有三个级别在统计学上都有显著差异:总之,目前的研究结果表明,冲洗溶液在清洁和去除小儿旋转锉涂抹层方面的效果明显优于手动K锉:牙髓治疗的有效性取决于成功的化学机械准备。使用手动锉或旋转器械对根管进行器械处理;有多种灌洗和器械处理技术。为了彻底消毒根管,在器械操作过程中需要使用化学药剂进行冲洗。由于许多天然化合物具有生物、抗菌、消炎和抗氧化特性,因此也被用作灌洗剂。如何引用本文:Abushanan A. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Abushanan A. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Abushanan A. Evaluation of the Smear Layer Removal Abushanan A. Evaluation of Various Rotary Files with/without Chemical Agents on Primary Teeth:体外研究。J Contemp Dent Pract 2024;25(4):354-357.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice (JCDP), is a peer-reviewed, open access MEDLINE indexed journal. The journal’s full text is available online at http://www.thejcdp.com. The journal allows free access (open access) to its contents. Articles with clinical relevance will be given preference for publication. The Journal publishes original research papers, review articles, rare and novel case reports, and clinical techniques. Manuscripts are invited from all specialties of dentistry i.e., conservative dentistry and endodontics, dentofacial orthopedics and orthodontics, oral medicine and radiology, oral pathology, oral surgery, orodental diseases, pediatric dentistry, implantology, periodontics, clinical aspects of public health dentistry, and prosthodontics.