Cardiac sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis - multidisciplinary approach for diagnosis.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-03 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001097
Vasileios Kouranos, Rakesh Sharma, Athol Wells, Victoria Singh-Curry
{"title":"Cardiac sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis - multidisciplinary approach for diagnosis.","authors":"Vasileios Kouranos, Rakesh Sharma, Athol Wells, Victoria Singh-Curry","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001097","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>The current review aims to highlight the role of multidisciplinary approach in the diagnosis of patients with cardiac and neurosarcoidosis. Multidisciplinary approach integrates the available clinical information, imaging and histopathological results aiming to reach a definite or at least provisional diagnosis and allow appropriate management. Multidisciplinary approach is the reference standard for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and should be strongly considered in complex clinical conditions such as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and neurosarcoidosis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Histopathological confirmation of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation provides a definite diagnosis of sarcoidosis involving any organ. However, a provisional high confidence or even definite clinical diagnosis can be reached using multidisciplinary evaluation of all available evidence. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis requires the integration of different expertise based on the current diagnostic criteria sets. Identifying typical or at least compatible patterns on advanced imaging modalities (CMR and Fluro-Deoxy-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)) seems key for the diagnosis of CS, while a confident diagnosis of extra-cardiac disease supports an at least provisional diagnosis. Similarly, in neurosarcoidosis integrating compatible MRI appearances and cerebrospinal fluid results in patients with systemic sarcoidosis allows an at least provisional diagnosis. Exclusion of alternative differential diagnoses is crucial and requires high clinical suspicion, imaging review expertise and appropriate tests performance.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>There have been considerable advances in the diagnostic approach of patients with cardiac and neurosarcoidosis. Multidisciplinary approach for both diagnosis and management is required to reach a confident clinical diagnosis and should be applied when possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001097","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: The current review aims to highlight the role of multidisciplinary approach in the diagnosis of patients with cardiac and neurosarcoidosis. Multidisciplinary approach integrates the available clinical information, imaging and histopathological results aiming to reach a definite or at least provisional diagnosis and allow appropriate management. Multidisciplinary approach is the reference standard for diagnosis of interstitial lung disease and should be strongly considered in complex clinical conditions such as cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) and neurosarcoidosis.

Recent findings: Histopathological confirmation of noncaseating granulomatous inflammation provides a definite diagnosis of sarcoidosis involving any organ. However, a provisional high confidence or even definite clinical diagnosis can be reached using multidisciplinary evaluation of all available evidence. The diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis and neurosarcoidosis requires the integration of different expertise based on the current diagnostic criteria sets. Identifying typical or at least compatible patterns on advanced imaging modalities (CMR and Fluro-Deoxy-Glucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET)) seems key for the diagnosis of CS, while a confident diagnosis of extra-cardiac disease supports an at least provisional diagnosis. Similarly, in neurosarcoidosis integrating compatible MRI appearances and cerebrospinal fluid results in patients with systemic sarcoidosis allows an at least provisional diagnosis. Exclusion of alternative differential diagnoses is crucial and requires high clinical suspicion, imaging review expertise and appropriate tests performance.

Summary: There have been considerable advances in the diagnostic approach of patients with cardiac and neurosarcoidosis. Multidisciplinary approach for both diagnosis and management is required to reach a confident clinical diagnosis and should be applied when possible.

心脏肉样瘤病和神经肉样瘤病--多学科诊断方法。
综述目的:本综述旨在强调多学科方法在诊断心脏和神经类肉瘤病患者中的作用。多学科方法综合了现有的临床信息、影像学和组织病理学结果,旨在得出明确或至少是临时的诊断,并进行适当的处理。多学科方法是间质性肺病诊断的参考标准,对于复杂的临床病症,如心脏肉样瘤病(CS)和神经肉样瘤病,应着重考虑多学科方法:组织病理学证实非溃疡性肉芽肿炎症可明确诊断累及任何器官的肉样瘤病。然而,通过对所有可用证据进行多学科评估,可以得出可信度较高甚至明确的临时临床诊断。心脏肉样瘤病和神经肉样瘤病的诊断需要在现有诊断标准集的基础上整合不同的专业知识。在先进的成像模式(CMR 和荧光脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描 (FDG-PET))上确定典型或至少相匹配的模式似乎是诊断 CS 的关键,而对心脏外疾病的确诊至少支持临时诊断。同样,在神经肉样瘤病中,结合全身性肉样瘤病患者的核磁共振成像表现和脑脊液结果,至少可以做出临时诊断。排除其他鉴别诊断至关重要,需要高度的临床怀疑、专业的影像学检查和适当的检测。诊断和管理都需要多学科方法,以获得可靠的临床诊断,在可能的情况下应采用多学科方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信