Responsible extractivism and other tales. LinkedIn, feel good, and the politics of responsible mining on social media

IF 3.4 2区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Raphael Deberdt
{"title":"Responsible extractivism and other tales. LinkedIn, feel good, and the politics of responsible mining on social media","authors":"Raphael Deberdt","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This article uses LinkedIn posts of responsible cobalt service providers to address the role of social media as a tool for corporate social responsibility. I argue that through written narrative, photographic practices, and knowledge production, these small companies assert their dominance on an industry that partly defines the transition to greener consumption. However, a close analysis of the discourses propagated via these mediums suggests that white supremacist, racist, and (post)colonial conceptions of African miners are reiterated and reproduced, largely preventing improvements in Congolese artisanal cobalt mines. Through invisibilization, fetishization, saviorism, and business development, these LinkedIn tales negate miners’ agencies. I illuminate a dual use of contrast in photographic content in the contrasting professionalization of white and African actors and using technical visual ratio and tones to legitimize and magnify their intended actions. Finally, I analyze the information grabbing through the control over information production and dissemination, with self-organized online events and participation in global and regional conferences as a system of othering of Congolese voices in favor of ‘feel good’ activities of service providers.’</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"154 ","pages":"Article 104052"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0016718524001131","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article uses LinkedIn posts of responsible cobalt service providers to address the role of social media as a tool for corporate social responsibility. I argue that through written narrative, photographic practices, and knowledge production, these small companies assert their dominance on an industry that partly defines the transition to greener consumption. However, a close analysis of the discourses propagated via these mediums suggests that white supremacist, racist, and (post)colonial conceptions of African miners are reiterated and reproduced, largely preventing improvements in Congolese artisanal cobalt mines. Through invisibilization, fetishization, saviorism, and business development, these LinkedIn tales negate miners’ agencies. I illuminate a dual use of contrast in photographic content in the contrasting professionalization of white and African actors and using technical visual ratio and tones to legitimize and magnify their intended actions. Finally, I analyze the information grabbing through the control over information production and dissemination, with self-organized online events and participation in global and regional conferences as a system of othering of Congolese voices in favor of ‘feel good’ activities of service providers.’

负责任的采掘主义和其他故事。LinkedIn、感觉良好以及社交媒体上的责任采矿政治
本文利用负责任的钴服务供应商在 LinkedIn 上发布的帖子,探讨社交媒体作为企业社会责任工具的作用。我认为,通过文字叙述、摄影实践和知识生产,这些小公司维护了自己在这个行业中的主导地位,而这个行业在一定程度上决定了向绿色消费的过渡。然而,对通过这些媒介传播的话语进行的仔细分析表明,白人至上主义、种族主义和(后)殖民主义对非洲矿工的观念得到了重申和复制,在很大程度上阻碍了刚果手工钴矿的改善。通过隐蔽化、拜物教、救世主和商业发展,这些 LinkedIn 故事否定了矿工的作用。我阐明了摄影内容中对比的双重使用,即白人和非洲人的职业化对比,以及使用技术视觉比例和色调来合法化和放大他们的预期行动。最后,我通过对信息生产和传播的控制来分析信息攫取,自发组织的在线活动以及参与全球和地区会议是一种将刚果人的声音他者化的系统,有利于服务提供商的'感觉良好'活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Geoforum
Geoforum GEOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
201
期刊介绍: Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信