Impact of pharmacists’ training on the knowledge of pain and associated risks: results of the OPTYMED 2 study

Nadine Attal , Béatrice Clairaz-Mahiou , Pascal Louis , Anna Annenkova , Jean-Yves Milon , Hervé Bismut , Serge Perrot
{"title":"Impact of pharmacists’ training on the knowledge of pain and associated risks: results of the OPTYMED 2 study","authors":"Nadine Attal ,&nbsp;Béatrice Clairaz-Mahiou ,&nbsp;Pascal Louis ,&nbsp;Anna Annenkova ,&nbsp;Jean-Yves Milon ,&nbsp;Hervé Bismut ,&nbsp;Serge Perrot","doi":"10.1016/j.lpmope.2024.100050","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The use of OTC analgesics is common worldwide, and the importance of the pharmacy teams is growing. Pharmacist-led medication implies that the pharmacy staff should have the necessary knowledge to deliver appropriate drugs, prevent an inappropriate drug consumption, and identify the patients in need of a medical advice. A randomized controlled study to assess the impact of training on pain knowledge and associated situations at risk among the French pharmacists and dispensers was performed. Participants were randomized into two groups receiving (n = 97) or not (n = 93) a training in the e-learning format. The training consisted of the 4 modules including the general knowledge of pain, headaches, acute musculoskeletal and chronic pain. The training modules were accompanied by the summary leaflets. The success rates were significantly higher in the trained group, with 35 % of participants reaching at least 70 % (primary endpoint) versus 2.3 % in the non-trained group. The results were not influenced by the size of the pharmacy. The knowledge improvement was more pronounced for the modules on the general knowledge of pain and headache management. For the questions associated to the risk situations, the success rates of at least 70 % were also significantly higher in the trained group The highest difference in success rates after the training was observed for the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Very low rates were obtained in both groups for the secondary headaches and the analgesic treatment adjustment in particular cases, such as chronic alcoholism or low weight. Results of this pilot study show that a training focused on pain could improve the overall knowledge of pain and suggest that it may contribute to a better pain identification, management and referral to physicians of patients at risk by the pharmacy staff in routine practice. The benefits of such a training should be assessed in a long-term prospective study, and the impact of a similar training in real-life practice remains to be evaluated.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100860,"journal":{"name":"La Presse Médicale Open","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100050"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590250424000048/pdfft?md5=2c323c24cea1ca13ac59f678ab41208c&pid=1-s2.0-S2590250424000048-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La Presse Médicale Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590250424000048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of OTC analgesics is common worldwide, and the importance of the pharmacy teams is growing. Pharmacist-led medication implies that the pharmacy staff should have the necessary knowledge to deliver appropriate drugs, prevent an inappropriate drug consumption, and identify the patients in need of a medical advice. A randomized controlled study to assess the impact of training on pain knowledge and associated situations at risk among the French pharmacists and dispensers was performed. Participants were randomized into two groups receiving (n = 97) or not (n = 93) a training in the e-learning format. The training consisted of the 4 modules including the general knowledge of pain, headaches, acute musculoskeletal and chronic pain. The training modules were accompanied by the summary leaflets. The success rates were significantly higher in the trained group, with 35 % of participants reaching at least 70 % (primary endpoint) versus 2.3 % in the non-trained group. The results were not influenced by the size of the pharmacy. The knowledge improvement was more pronounced for the modules on the general knowledge of pain and headache management. For the questions associated to the risk situations, the success rates of at least 70 % were also significantly higher in the trained group The highest difference in success rates after the training was observed for the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Very low rates were obtained in both groups for the secondary headaches and the analgesic treatment adjustment in particular cases, such as chronic alcoholism or low weight. Results of this pilot study show that a training focused on pain could improve the overall knowledge of pain and suggest that it may contribute to a better pain identification, management and referral to physicians of patients at risk by the pharmacy staff in routine practice. The benefits of such a training should be assessed in a long-term prospective study, and the impact of a similar training in real-life practice remains to be evaluated.

药剂师培训对疼痛及相关风险知识的影响:OPTYMED 2 研究结果
非处方镇痛药的使用在全世界都很普遍,药房团队的重要性也与日俱增。药剂师指导用药意味着药剂师应掌握必要的知识,以提供适当的药物,防止不适当的药物消费,并识别需要医疗建议的患者。一项随机对照研究旨在评估培训对法国药剂师和配药师疼痛知识和相关风险情况的影响。参与者被随机分为两组,分别接受(97 人)或不接受(93 人)电子学习形式的培训。培训由 4 个模块组成,包括疼痛常识、头痛、急性肌肉骨骼疼痛和慢性疼痛。培训模块附有摘要宣传单。接受过培训组的成功率明显更高,35% 的参与者至少达到 70%(主要终点),而未接受过培训组的成功率仅为 2.3%。结果不受药店规模的影响。疼痛和头痛管理常识模块的知识改进更为明显。在与风险情况相关的问题上,受过培训组的成功率也明显高于未受过培训组,至少达到 70%。在继发性头痛和特殊情况(如长期酗酒或体重过轻)下的镇痛治疗调整方面,两组的成功率都很低。这项试点研究的结果表明,以疼痛为重点的培训可以提高人们对疼痛的整体认识,并有助于药剂师在日常工作中更好地识别、管理和向医生转介有风险的疼痛患者。此类培训的益处应在长期的前瞻性研究中进行评估,而类似培训在实际工作中的影响仍有待评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信