Digital geographies of diplomacy: The uneven digital mediation of spaces and encounters at the UN Human Rights Council

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Alex Manby, Fiona McConnell
{"title":"Digital geographies of diplomacy: The uneven digital mediation of spaces and encounters at the UN Human Rights Council","authors":"Alex Manby,&nbsp;Fiona McConnell","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In Spring 2020, as COVID-19 spread across the globe, diplomats embraced the digital as a means of continuing to practise statecraft. Drawing on online observations of the (resumed) 43rd, 44th and 45th sessions of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) in 2020, and 23 interviews with representatives who participated in these sessions, this paper addresses two lacuna in the existing literature: the under-theorisation of the role of the spatial in studies of digital diplomacy; and the lack of attention paid to diplomacy in digital geographies scholarship. We explore how diplomacy, an inherently spatial practice, is being ‘recast’ by the digital via a shift both in the <em>form</em> of diplomatic interactions, and in the human and non-human <em>actors</em> involved in doing diplomacy. In doing so, we take as our starting point Leszczynski's theory of the mediation of socio-spatial-digital relations. We consider two features of digital diplomacy which scholarship on digital mediation opens up for examination. First, how digitalisation – specifically the use of ‘real-time’ online audio-visual communication devices – has altered the geographies of diplomatic inclusion and exclusion at the HRC, simultaneously fostering interactions between diverse diplomatic actors whilst also exacerbating pre-existing spatial exclusions. Second, the shifting geographies of diplomatic encounters, including how digital technologies have reconfigured opportunities for intimacy. The paper concludes by calling for dialogue between scholars of digital diplomacy and of digital geographies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"113 ","pages":"Article 103147"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824000969/pdfft?md5=23c42d82b888cbedd41010af80aaa151&pid=1-s2.0-S0962629824000969-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824000969","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Spring 2020, as COVID-19 spread across the globe, diplomats embraced the digital as a means of continuing to practise statecraft. Drawing on online observations of the (resumed) 43rd, 44th and 45th sessions of the United Nations Human Rights Council (HRC) in 2020, and 23 interviews with representatives who participated in these sessions, this paper addresses two lacuna in the existing literature: the under-theorisation of the role of the spatial in studies of digital diplomacy; and the lack of attention paid to diplomacy in digital geographies scholarship. We explore how diplomacy, an inherently spatial practice, is being ‘recast’ by the digital via a shift both in the form of diplomatic interactions, and in the human and non-human actors involved in doing diplomacy. In doing so, we take as our starting point Leszczynski's theory of the mediation of socio-spatial-digital relations. We consider two features of digital diplomacy which scholarship on digital mediation opens up for examination. First, how digitalisation – specifically the use of ‘real-time’ online audio-visual communication devices – has altered the geographies of diplomatic inclusion and exclusion at the HRC, simultaneously fostering interactions between diverse diplomatic actors whilst also exacerbating pre-existing spatial exclusions. Second, the shifting geographies of diplomatic encounters, including how digital technologies have reconfigured opportunities for intimacy. The paper concludes by calling for dialogue between scholars of digital diplomacy and of digital geographies.

外交的数字地理:联合国人权理事会对空间和遭遇的不均衡数字调解
2020 年春,随着 COVID-19 在全球范围内的传播,外交官们将数字技术作为继续实践国事活动的一种手段。本文通过对2020年联合国人权理事会(HRC)第43届、44届和45届会议(续会)的在线观察,以及对参加这些会议的代表进行的23次访谈,探讨了现有文献中的两个空白:数字外交研究中空间作用的理论化不足;以及数字地理学术界对外交的关注不足。我们探讨了外交这一固有的空间实践如何通过外交互动形式以及参与外交的人类和非人类行动者的转变而被数字 "重塑"。为此,我们以莱辛斯基(Leszczynski)的社会-空间-数字关系中介理论为出发点。我们考虑了数字外交的两个特点,而数字中介的学术研究为我们提供了研究的机会。首先,数字化--特别是 "实时 "在线视听通信设备的使用--如何改变了人权理事会外交包容与排斥的地理格局,在促进不同外交参与者之间互动的同时,也加剧了原有的空间排斥。其次,外交接触的地理格局变化,包括数字技术如何重新配置了亲密接触的机会。论文最后呼吁数字外交学者与数字地理学者开展对话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信