Implementation of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Colorado from 2020 to 2022: Firearm relinquishment and return and petitioner characteristics

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Leslie M Barnard , Nisha Batta , Megan McCarthy , Kimberly Thies , Caitlin Robinson , Marcus Schultze , Marian E. Betz , Christopher E. Knoepke
{"title":"Implementation of Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Colorado from 2020 to 2022: Firearm relinquishment and return and petitioner characteristics","authors":"Leslie M Barnard ,&nbsp;Nisha Batta ,&nbsp;Megan McCarthy ,&nbsp;Kimberly Thies ,&nbsp;Caitlin Robinson ,&nbsp;Marcus Schultze ,&nbsp;Marian E. Betz ,&nbsp;Christopher E. Knoepke","doi":"10.1016/j.pmedr.2024.102800","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Firearm injury remains a public health problem, with nearly 50,000 firearm-related deaths in the US in 2021. Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are civil restraining orders that intend to reduce firearm deaths by temporarily removing firearms from individuals who are threatening violence to themselves or others. We described ERPO use by petitioner type and implementation including firearm removal.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>All ERPO petitions filed in Colorado (1/1/2020–12/31/2022) were analyzed using an established abstraction tool and team-based approach. Case data abstracted from petitions and court documents were analyzed descriptively.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Over three years, there were 353 ERPO petitions filed in Colorado. Only 39 % percent of granted petitions had documentation of firearms being relinquished. The average number firearms relinquished was 1.8 with a range of 1 to 31 firearms. One third (37.7 %) of petitions mentioned a mental health issue, 10 % had a renewal request, and half (54.6 %) of petitions were filed by law enforcement (LE). LE petitions filed were more likely to be granted temporary ERPOs (94.3 % vs 35.0 %, p &lt; 0.0001) and full year ERPOs (79.7 % vs 39.3 %, p &lt; 0.0001) compared to non-LE petitions.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Results from these analyses shed light on data gaps surrounding ERPO use and implementation. Differences in LE vs others’ ERPO outcomes suggest a need for additional research and training. ERPOs’ efficacy hinges on removing access to firearms among those at risk, and a lack of documentation limits the ability to evaluate these policies. This suggests a need to standardize reporting to ensure ERPO utilization and impact can be evaluated.</p><p>Mini abstract: This descriptive study assessed use, implementation and data gaps surrounding Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Colorado.</p><p>Abbreviations: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are civil restraining orders that intend to reduce firearm deaths by temporarily removing firearms from individuals who are threatening violence to themselves or others.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524002158/pdfft?md5=92552cfe97dbf017bb93344a59d6842f&pid=1-s2.0-S2211335524002158-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211335524002158","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Firearm injury remains a public health problem, with nearly 50,000 firearm-related deaths in the US in 2021. Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are civil restraining orders that intend to reduce firearm deaths by temporarily removing firearms from individuals who are threatening violence to themselves or others. We described ERPO use by petitioner type and implementation including firearm removal.

Methods

All ERPO petitions filed in Colorado (1/1/2020–12/31/2022) were analyzed using an established abstraction tool and team-based approach. Case data abstracted from petitions and court documents were analyzed descriptively.

Results

Over three years, there were 353 ERPO petitions filed in Colorado. Only 39 % percent of granted petitions had documentation of firearms being relinquished. The average number firearms relinquished was 1.8 with a range of 1 to 31 firearms. One third (37.7 %) of petitions mentioned a mental health issue, 10 % had a renewal request, and half (54.6 %) of petitions were filed by law enforcement (LE). LE petitions filed were more likely to be granted temporary ERPOs (94.3 % vs 35.0 %, p < 0.0001) and full year ERPOs (79.7 % vs 39.3 %, p < 0.0001) compared to non-LE petitions.

Conclusion

Results from these analyses shed light on data gaps surrounding ERPO use and implementation. Differences in LE vs others’ ERPO outcomes suggest a need for additional research and training. ERPOs’ efficacy hinges on removing access to firearms among those at risk, and a lack of documentation limits the ability to evaluate these policies. This suggests a need to standardize reporting to ensure ERPO utilization and impact can be evaluated.

Mini abstract: This descriptive study assessed use, implementation and data gaps surrounding Extreme Risk Protection Orders in Colorado.

Abbreviations: Extreme risk protection orders (ERPOs) are civil restraining orders that intend to reduce firearm deaths by temporarily removing firearms from individuals who are threatening violence to themselves or others.

2020 年至 2022 年科罗拉多州极端风险保护令的执行情况:枪支放弃和归还以及申请人的特征
导言:枪支伤害仍然是一个公共卫生问题,2021 年美国将有近 50,000 人死于枪支。极度危险保护令(ERPO)是一种民事限制令,旨在通过暂时从威胁对自己或他人实施暴力的个人手中移除枪支来减少枪支造成的死亡。我们按申请人类型和执行情况(包括枪支移除)对ERPO 的使用情况进行了描述。方法使用已建立的摘要工具和团队方法对科罗拉多州提交的所有ERPO 申请(2020 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日)进行了分析。结果三年来,科罗拉多州共提交了 353 份ERPO 申请。在批准的申请中,只有 39% 的申请有放弃枪支的文件记录。放弃枪支的平均数量为 1.8 支,范围从 1 支到 31 支不等。三分之一(37.7%)的申请提到了精神健康问题,10%的申请提出了续期要求,半数(54.6%)的申请由执法部门(LE)提出。与非执法人员的申请相比,执法人员的申请更有可能获得临时ERPO(94.3% vs 35.0%,p <0.0001)和全年ERPO(79.7% vs 39.3%,p <0.0001)。LE 与其他 ERPO 结果的差异表明,有必要开展更多的研究和培训。ERPO是否有效取决于能否消除高危人群获得枪支的机会,而文件记录的缺乏限制了评估这些政策的能力。微型摘要:这项描述性研究评估了科罗拉多州极端危险保护令的使用、执行情况和数据缺口:极度危险保护令(ERPO)是一种民事限制令,旨在通过暂时从威胁对自己或他人实施暴力的个人手中夺走枪支来减少枪支造成的死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信