A Comparative Review of Solidified Floating Organic Drop Microextraction Methods for Metal Separation: recent Developments, Enhanced co-Factors, Challenges, and Environmental Assessment.

IF 4.2 2区化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL

Critical reviews in analytical chemistry Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1080/10408347.2024.2366939

Nidhal Hatif Hammood, Fatimah Abdulwahhab Kadhim, Melath K Al-Gufaili, Ebaa Adnan Azooz, Denys Snigur

{"title":"A Comparative Review of Solidified Floating Organic Drop Microextraction Methods for Metal Separation: recent Developments, Enhanced co-Factors, Challenges, and Environmental Assessment.","authors":"Nidhal Hatif Hammood, Fatimah Abdulwahhab Kadhim, Melath K Al-Gufaili, Ebaa Adnan Azooz, Denys Snigur","doi":"10.1080/10408347.2024.2366939","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current work is devoted to a comparative analysis of enhanced co-factors in solidified floating organic drop microextraction methods (SFODME) and an environmental assessment. Also, the description of SFODME, with a focus on its applications in the determination of metals in different matrices, was explained. The impact of several parameters, developments, and greenness evaluations was introduced. Especially, the review provides a concise overview of the multiple approaches to SFODME, with an emphasis on environmentally friendly, supported co-factors. These mods include ultrasound, vortex, and air-assisted SFODME procedures. The selectivity and sensitivity increase when co-factors are added to SFODME. Lastly, the analysis also aims to select tools (Analytic GREEnness Metric Approach (AGREE), Red-Green-Blue (RGB12), and Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI)) that have been described as environmentally friendly. Additionally provide an explanation of the data collected, compare, and emphasize the advantages of certain characteristics in each tool. Furthermore, case studies and comparisons for three tools were shown.</p>","PeriodicalId":10744,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in analytical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2024.2366939","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The current work is devoted to a comparative analysis of enhanced co-factors in solidified floating organic drop microextraction methods (SFODME) and an environmental assessment. Also, the description of SFODME, with a focus on its applications in the determination of metals in different matrices, was explained. The impact of several parameters, developments, and greenness evaluations was introduced. Especially, the review provides a concise overview of the multiple approaches to SFODME, with an emphasis on environmentally friendly, supported co-factors. These mods include ultrasound, vortex, and air-assisted SFODME procedures. The selectivity and sensitivity increase when co-factors are added to SFODME. Lastly, the analysis also aims to select tools (Analytic GREEnness Metric Approach (AGREE), Red-Green-Blue (RGB12), and Blue Applicability Grade Index (BAGI)) that have been described as environmentally friendly. Additionally provide an explanation of the data collected, compare, and emphasize the advantages of certain characteristics in each tool. Furthermore, case studies and comparisons for three tools were shown.

查看原文本刊更多论文

用于金属分离的固化浮动有机液滴微萃取法比较综述：最新进展、增强的协同因素、挑战和环境评估。

目前的工作主要是对固化浮动有机液滴微萃取法（SFODME）中增强的辅助因子进行比较分析和环境评估。此外，还介绍了 SFODME，重点是其在测定不同基质中金属含量方面的应用。此外，还介绍了几个参数、发展和绿色评估的影响。特别是，该综述简明扼要地概述了 SFODME 的多种方法，重点介绍了环境友好型、辅助辅助因子。这些模式包括超声、涡流和空气辅助 SFODME 程序。在 SFODME 中添加辅助因子后，选择性和灵敏度都会提高。最后，分析还旨在选择被描述为环境友好型的工具（分析 GREEnness 度量方法 (AGREE)、红绿蓝 (RGB12) 和蓝色适用性等级指数 (BAGI)）。此外，还对所收集的数据进行了解释、比较，并强调了每种工具中某些特征的优势。此外，还展示了三种工具的案例研究和比较。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Critical reviews in analytical chemistry 化学-分析化学

CiteScore

12.00

自引率

4.00%

发文量

137

审稿时长

6 months

期刊介绍： Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry continues to be a dependable resource for both the expert and the student by providing in-depth, scholarly, insightful reviews of important topics within the discipline of analytical chemistry and related measurement sciences. The journal exclusively publishes review articles that illuminate the underlying science, that evaluate the field''s status by putting recent developments into proper perspective and context, and that speculate on possible future developments. A limited number of articles are of a "tutorial" format written by experts for scientists seeking introduction or clarification in a new area. This journal serves as a forum for linking various underlying components in broad and interdisciplinary means, while maintaining balance between applied and fundamental research. Topics we are interested in receiving reviews on are the following: · chemical analysis; · instrumentation; · chemometrics; · analytical biochemistry; · medicinal analysis; · forensics; · environmental sciences; · applied physics; · and material science.