Less invasive replacement of aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch via partial upper sternotomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison with full sternotomy.

0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Nestoras Papadopoulos, Vasileios Ntinopoulos, Achim Haeussler, Dragan Odavic, Petar Risteski, Héctor Rodríguez Cetina Biefer, Omer Dzemali
{"title":"Less invasive replacement of aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch via partial upper sternotomy: a propensity-score-matched comparison with full sternotomy.","authors":"Nestoras Papadopoulos, Vasileios Ntinopoulos, Achim Haeussler, Dragan Odavic, Petar Risteski, Héctor Rodríguez Cetina Biefer, Omer Dzemali","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivae120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Less invasive surgery has emerged as an option for aortic pathologies. The current study compared our experience on early postoperative results of patients with aortic surgery between partial upper sternotomy (PUS) and full sternotomy (FS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective analysis of the data of patients undergoing aortic root surgery with concomitant ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement. Exclusion criteria were type A aortic dissection and other concomitant major cardiac surgery. After propensity score matching, we compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with PUS versus FS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 161 patients operated on between January 2013 and September 2022 met the inclusion criteria (PUS: n = 22, FS: n = 139). Propensity score matching yielded 22 pairs with a balanced distribution of propensity scores and covariates between the compared groups. There was no evidence that PUS affects cardiopulmonary bypass [108 (67-119) vs 113 (87-148) min, P = 0.154; PUS vs FS] and circulatory arrest duration [9 (7-10) vs 9 (8-13) min, P = 0.264; PUS vs FS]. There was a reduced cross-clamp duration in the PUS group [88 (58-96) vs 92 (71-122) min, P = 0.032]. Cumulative sum charts have shown consistently low cross-clamp and circulatory arrest duration for 2 experienced surgeons who performed 20 of the procedures in the PUS group (10 each). Perioperative mortality and morbidity were low, with no in-hospital mortality in the PUS group [0 vs 1(4.5%), P > 0.999] and absence of strokes in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In summary, our initial experience suggests that less invasive aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement via PUS could be performed in our patient cohort as safely as via full sternotomy. Advantages for the patient are reduced surgical trauma, improved cosmetic results and-presumably-less pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11254289/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivae120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Less invasive surgery has emerged as an option for aortic pathologies. The current study compared our experience on early postoperative results of patients with aortic surgery between partial upper sternotomy (PUS) and full sternotomy (FS).

Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the data of patients undergoing aortic root surgery with concomitant ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement. Exclusion criteria were type A aortic dissection and other concomitant major cardiac surgery. After propensity score matching, we compared the perioperative outcomes of patients undergoing surgery with PUS versus FS.

Results: A total of 161 patients operated on between January 2013 and September 2022 met the inclusion criteria (PUS: n = 22, FS: n = 139). Propensity score matching yielded 22 pairs with a balanced distribution of propensity scores and covariates between the compared groups. There was no evidence that PUS affects cardiopulmonary bypass [108 (67-119) vs 113 (87-148) min, P = 0.154; PUS vs FS] and circulatory arrest duration [9 (7-10) vs 9 (8-13) min, P = 0.264; PUS vs FS]. There was a reduced cross-clamp duration in the PUS group [88 (58-96) vs 92 (71-122) min, P = 0.032]. Cumulative sum charts have shown consistently low cross-clamp and circulatory arrest duration for 2 experienced surgeons who performed 20 of the procedures in the PUS group (10 each). Perioperative mortality and morbidity were low, with no in-hospital mortality in the PUS group [0 vs 1(4.5%), P > 0.999] and absence of strokes in both groups.

Conclusions: In summary, our initial experience suggests that less invasive aortic root, ascending aorta and hemiarch replacement via PUS could be performed in our patient cohort as safely as via full sternotomy. Advantages for the patient are reduced surgical trauma, improved cosmetic results and-presumably-less pain.

通过部分上胸骨切开术进行主动脉根部、升主动脉和半弓的微创置换术:与全胸骨切开术的倾向得分匹配比较。
目的:微创手术已成为主动脉病变的一种选择。本研究比较了胸骨上部分切开术(PUS)和全胸骨切开术(FS)主动脉手术患者的术后早期效果:我们对接受主动脉根部手术并同时接受升主动脉和半弓置换术的患者数据进行了回顾性分析。排除标准是A型主动脉夹层和同时接受其他大型心脏手术的患者。经过倾向分数匹配后,我们比较了PUS与FS手术患者的围手术期结果:2013年1月至2022年9月期间接受手术的161名患者符合纳入标准(PUS:22人,FS:139人)。倾向得分匹配结果显示,22对患者的倾向得分和协变量在比较组之间分布均衡。没有证据表明 PUS 会影响心肺旁路[108(67-119) vs 113(87-148) min, p = 0.154; PUS vs FS]和循环停止持续时间[9(7-10) vs 9(8-13) min, p = 0.264; PUS vs FS]。PUS 组的交叉钳夹持续时间缩短[88(58-96)分钟 vs 92(71-122)分钟,p = 0.032]。累积总和图表(CUSUM)显示,PUS 组中有两名经验丰富的外科医生实施了 20 例手术(各 10 例),他们的交叉钳夹和循环停止持续时间始终较短。围手术期死亡率和发病率都很低,PUS 组无院内死亡率[0 vs 1(4.5%),p > 0.999],两组均无中风:总之,我们的初步经验表明,在我们的患者群中,通过部分上胸骨切开术进行创伤较小的主动脉根部、升主动脉和半弓置换术与通过全胸骨切开术一样安全。对患者的好处是减少手术创伤、改善外观效果,以及可能减轻疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信