PAS-7 is Superior to APAIS for Assessing Preoperative Anxiety in the Chinese Population

IF 1.6 4区医学 Q2 NURSING

Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing Pub Date : 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jopan.2023.12.022

{"title":"PAS-7 is Superior to APAIS for Assessing Preoperative Anxiety in the Chinese Population","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jopan.2023.12.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the Perioperative Anxiety Scale-7 (PAS-7), which was created by Chinese medical professionals, by using the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI-S) as the standard for the diagnosis of preoperative anxiety, and to compare whether there is a difference between the PAS-7 and the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) in the diagnosis of preoperative anxiety in the Chinese population.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>This study was an observational study.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>The PAS-7, APAIS, and STAI-S were all completed the day before surgery. The internal consistency<span><span> test was used to evaluate the scale's reliability, and exploratory factor analysis and </span>confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess the scale's </span></span>construct validity. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between PAS-7 and STAI-S, and APAIS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic value of PAS-7 and APAIS.</div></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><div><span>The PAS-7 Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.804. The indicators of the overall fitting coefficient were within the acceptable range. PAS-7 scores correlated well with STAI-S and APAIS scores (</span><em>P</em> < .01). The area under the ROC curve of PAS-7 was 0.808 (0.752-0.856), and the area under the ROC curve of APAIS was 0.674 (0.611-0.733). The difference between areas was 0.133 (0.0612-0.206), <em>P</em> < .001, and the diagnostic value of PAS-7 was higher than that of APAIS.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The PAS-7 scale has high reliability and validity and can be used to assess preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective surgery. PAS-7 is superior to APAIS for assessing preoperative anxiety in the Chinese population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1089947223011127","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to analyze the reliability and validity of the Perioperative Anxiety Scale-7 (PAS-7), which was created by Chinese medical professionals, by using the State-Trait Anxiety Scale (STAI-S) as the standard for the diagnosis of preoperative anxiety, and to compare whether there is a difference between the PAS-7 and the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) in the diagnosis of preoperative anxiety in the Chinese population.

Design

This study was an observational study.

Methods

The PAS-7, APAIS, and STAI-S were all completed the day before surgery. The internal consistency test was used to evaluate the scale's reliability, and exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to assess the scale's construct validity. Pearson correlation was used to analyze the correlation between PAS-7 and STAI-S, and APAIS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to compare the diagnostic value of PAS-7 and APAIS.

Findings

The PAS-7 Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.804. The indicators of the overall fitting coefficient were within the acceptable range. PAS-7 scores correlated well with STAI-S and APAIS scores (P < .01). The area under the ROC curve of PAS-7 was 0.808 (0.752-0.856), and the area under the ROC curve of APAIS was 0.674 (0.611-0.733). The difference between areas was 0.133 (0.0612-0.206), P < .001, and the diagnostic value of PAS-7 was higher than that of APAIS.

Conclusions

The PAS-7 scale has high reliability and validity and can be used to assess preoperative anxiety in patients undergoing elective surgery. PAS-7 is superior to APAIS for assessing preoperative anxiety in the Chinese population.

查看原文本刊更多论文

PAS-7 在评估中国人群术前焦虑方面优于 APAIS。

目的：本研究旨在以状态-特质焦虑量表（STAI-S）作为诊断术前焦虑的标准，分析中国医务人员自编的围术期焦虑量表-7（PAS-7）的信度和效度，并比较PAS-7与阿姆斯特丹术前焦虑与信息量表（APAIS）在诊断中国人群术前焦虑方面是否存在差异：本研究为观察性研究：方法：PAS-7、APAIS 和 STAI-S 均在手术前一天完成。采用内部一致性检验评估量表的信度，采用探索性因子分析和确认性因子分析评估量表的构建效度。Pearson 相关性用于分析 PAS-7 与 STAI-S 和 APAIS 之间的相关性。使用接收者操作特征曲线下面积（ROC）来比较 PAS-7 和 APAIS 的诊断价值：结果：PAS-7 的 Cronbach's α 系数为 0.804。总体拟合系数的各项指标均在可接受范围内。PAS-7 评分与 STAI-S 和 APAIS 评分相关性良好（P 结论：PAS-7 量表具有较高的信度和效度：PAS-7 量表具有较高的信度和效度，可用于评估择期手术患者的术前焦虑。PAS-7 在评估中国人群的术前焦虑方面优于 APAIS。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Perianesthesia Nursing NURSING-

CiteScore

2.20

自引率

17.60%

发文量

279

审稿时长

90 days

期刊介绍： The Journal of PeriAnesthesia Nursing provides original, peer-reviewed research for a primary audience that includes nurses in perianesthesia settings, including ambulatory surgery, preadmission testing, postanesthesia care (Phases I and II), extended observation, and pain management. The Journal provides a forum for sharing professional knowledge and experience relating to management, ethics, legislation, research, and other aspects of perianesthesia nursing.