Implicit measures of suicide vulnerability: Investigating suicide-related information-processing biases and a deficit in behavioral impulse control in a high-risk sample and healthy controls

IF 4.2 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Juliane Brüdern , Lena Spangenberg , Maria Stein , Thomas Forkmann , Dajana Schreiber , Katarina Stengler , Helena Gold , Heide Glaesmer
{"title":"Implicit measures of suicide vulnerability: Investigating suicide-related information-processing biases and a deficit in behavioral impulse control in a high-risk sample and healthy controls","authors":"Juliane Brüdern ,&nbsp;Lena Spangenberg ,&nbsp;Maria Stein ,&nbsp;Thomas Forkmann ,&nbsp;Dajana Schreiber ,&nbsp;Katarina Stengler ,&nbsp;Helena Gold ,&nbsp;Heide Glaesmer","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2024.104601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Relevant implicit markers of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) have only been studied in isolation with mixed evidence. This is the first study that investigated a suicide attentional bias, a death-identity bias and a deficit in behavioral impulsivity in a high-risk sample and healthy controls.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>We administered the Death Implicit Association Test, the Modified Suicide Stroop Task, and a Go/No-Go Task to inpatient suicide ideators (<em>n</em> = 42), suicide attempters (<em>n</em> = 40), and community controls (<em>n</em> = 61).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Suicide ideators and attempters showed a suicide attentional bias and a death-identity bias compared to healthy controls. Ideators and attempters did not differ in these implicit information-processing biases. Notably, only attempters were more behaviorally impulsive compared to controls; however, ideators and attempters did not significantly differ in behavioral impulsivity. Moreover, implicit scores were positively intercorrelated in the total sample.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>In line with the Cognitive Model of Suicide, ideators and attempters display suicide-related information processing biases, which can be considered as implicit cognitive markers of suicide vulnerability. Furthermore, attempters have elevated levels of behavioral impulsiveness. These results are highly relevant in the context of crisis intervention strategies and warrant further research.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"180 ","pages":"Article 104601"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724001281/pdfft?md5=cd873f3871314056105a4f3225c6eb59&pid=1-s2.0-S0005796724001281-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796724001281","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Relevant implicit markers of suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs) have only been studied in isolation with mixed evidence. This is the first study that investigated a suicide attentional bias, a death-identity bias and a deficit in behavioral impulsivity in a high-risk sample and healthy controls.

Method

We administered the Death Implicit Association Test, the Modified Suicide Stroop Task, and a Go/No-Go Task to inpatient suicide ideators (n = 42), suicide attempters (n = 40), and community controls (n = 61).

Results

Suicide ideators and attempters showed a suicide attentional bias and a death-identity bias compared to healthy controls. Ideators and attempters did not differ in these implicit information-processing biases. Notably, only attempters were more behaviorally impulsive compared to controls; however, ideators and attempters did not significantly differ in behavioral impulsivity. Moreover, implicit scores were positively intercorrelated in the total sample.

Conclusion

In line with the Cognitive Model of Suicide, ideators and attempters display suicide-related information processing biases, which can be considered as implicit cognitive markers of suicide vulnerability. Furthermore, attempters have elevated levels of behavioral impulsiveness. These results are highly relevant in the context of crisis intervention strategies and warrant further research.

自杀脆弱性的内隐测量:调查高危样本和健康对照组中与自杀相关的信息处理偏差和行为冲动控制缺陷。
目的:自杀想法和行为(STBs)的相关内隐标记只被单独研究过,证据不一。这是第一项在高危样本和健康对照组中调查自杀注意偏差、死亡认同偏差和行为冲动缺陷的研究:方法:我们对住院的自杀意念者(n = 42)、自杀企图者(n = 40)和社区对照组(n = 61)进行了死亡内隐联想测试、改良自杀史卓普任务和去/不去任务:与健康对照组相比,自杀意念者和自杀企图者表现出自杀注意偏差和死亡认同偏差。意念自杀者和企图自杀者在这些内隐信息处理偏差方面没有差异。值得注意的是,与对照组相比,只有企图自杀者的行为冲动性更高;然而,意念自杀者和企图自杀者在行为冲动性方面并无显著差异。此外,在所有样本中,内隐得分呈正相关:结论:根据自杀认知模型,意念自杀者和企图自杀者表现出与自杀相关的信息处理偏差,这可被视为自杀脆弱性的内隐认知标记。此外,企图自杀者的行为冲动水平也有所提高。这些结果与危机干预策略高度相关,值得进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behaviour Research and Therapy
Behaviour Research and Therapy PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.30%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信