Community-engaged Research Partnerships as Healing Spaces for Health Professionals and Researchers.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Sirry M Alang, Abby S Letcher, Hasshan Batts, Carol Moeller, Nyann Biery, Mary Mitsdarffer, Autumn M Kieber-Emmons, Jose Rivera, Melanie Johnson
{"title":"Community-engaged Research Partnerships as Healing Spaces for Health Professionals and Researchers.","authors":"Sirry M Alang, Abby S Letcher, Hasshan Batts, Carol Moeller, Nyann Biery, Mary Mitsdarffer, Autumn M Kieber-Emmons, Jose Rivera, Melanie Johnson","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drawing from collective experiences in our capacity building project: Health Equity Activation Research Team for Inclusion Health, we argue that while community-engaged partnerships tend to focus on understanding health inequities and developing solutions, they can be healing spaces for health professionals and researchers. Data were obtained from a 15-month participatory ethnography, including focus groups and interviews. Ethnographic notes and transcripts were coded and analyzed using both deductive and inductive coding. Practices of radical welcome, vulnerability, valuing the whole person, acknowledging how partnerships can cause harm, and centering lived experience expertise in knowledge creation processes were identified as key characteristics of healing spaces. Ultimately, health professionals and researchers work within the same social, political and economic contexts of populations with the worst health outcomes. Their own healing is critical for tackling larger systemic changes aimed at improving the well-being of communities harmed by legacies of exclusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":46970,"journal":{"name":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","volume":"18 2","pages":"287-293"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in Community Health Partnerships-Research Education and Action","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Drawing from collective experiences in our capacity building project: Health Equity Activation Research Team for Inclusion Health, we argue that while community-engaged partnerships tend to focus on understanding health inequities and developing solutions, they can be healing spaces for health professionals and researchers. Data were obtained from a 15-month participatory ethnography, including focus groups and interviews. Ethnographic notes and transcripts were coded and analyzed using both deductive and inductive coding. Practices of radical welcome, vulnerability, valuing the whole person, acknowledging how partnerships can cause harm, and centering lived experience expertise in knowledge creation processes were identified as key characteristics of healing spaces. Ultimately, health professionals and researchers work within the same social, political and economic contexts of populations with the worst health outcomes. Their own healing is critical for tackling larger systemic changes aimed at improving the well-being of communities harmed by legacies of exclusion.

社区参与的研究伙伴关系是医护人员和研究人员的康复空间。
从我们的能力建设项目中汲取集体经验:我们认为,虽然社区参与型伙伴关系往往侧重于了解健康不公平现象和制定解决方案,但它们也可以成为医护专业人员和研究人员的疗愈空间。数据来自为期 15 个月的参与式人种学研究,包括焦点小组和访谈。采用演绎法和归纳法对人种学笔记和记录誊本进行了编码和分析。彻底欢迎、脆弱性、重视全人、承认合作关系可能造成伤害以及在知识创造过程中以生活经验专业知识为中心等做法被认为是治疗空间的关键特征。归根结底,卫生专业人员和研究人员的工作环境与健康状况最差的人群所处的社会、政治和经济环境相同。他们自身的康复对于解决更大的系统性变革至关重要,这些变革的目的是改善受到排斥遗留问题伤害的社区的福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信