Comparison of two CBCT analysis techniques with conventional periapical radiographs in assessment of tertiary dentin after indirect pulp capping in young permanent teeth.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Marwa Baraka, Lucia Cevidanes, Antonio Ruellas, Erika Benavides, Nourhan Aly, Margherita Fontana
{"title":"Comparison of two CBCT analysis techniques with conventional periapical radiographs in assessment of tertiary dentin after indirect pulp capping in young permanent teeth.","authors":"Marwa Baraka, Lucia Cevidanes, Antonio Ruellas, Erika Benavides, Nourhan Aly, Margherita Fontana","doi":"10.1111/ipd.13232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>To compare two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis techniques for measuring tertiary dentin (TD) volume, density, and root length increase, after indirect pulp therapy (IPT) in young permanent teeth with conventional periapical radiographs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Comparative study design: Sixty-nine CBCT scans were taken initially (T1) and after 1 year (T2) of IPT. New CBCT analysis technique A, standardization, segmentation, and registration of T1 and T2 scans were performed using ITK-SNAP and 3D Slicer CMF to measure TD volume (mm<sup>3</sup>), density (gray-level intensity), and root length increase (mm). In the traditional CBCT analysis technique B, analyses were conducted using the In-Vivo software to calculate TD thickness (mm), radiodensity (HU%), and root length increase (mm). Paired t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to compare and assess the reliability of all techniques.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant difference between the two techniques existed in the measurement of TD mineral density (Mean [SD]:A = 22.4 [15.4]; B = 24.4 [15.4]; p = .47). Technique A resulted in significantly higher root length increase values (Mean [SD]: A = 1.3 [0.6]; B = 1.1 [0.5]; p = .03). The two techniques showed acceptable reliability levels (0.76-0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CBCT analysis techniques yielded similar findings for mineral density. The new CBCT volumetric analysis technique, although more laborious, produced higher values for root length increase, and allowed for measurement of dentin volume.</p>","PeriodicalId":14268,"journal":{"name":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of paediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ipd.13232","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: To compare two cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) analysis techniques for measuring tertiary dentin (TD) volume, density, and root length increase, after indirect pulp therapy (IPT) in young permanent teeth with conventional periapical radiographs.

Design: Comparative study design: Sixty-nine CBCT scans were taken initially (T1) and after 1 year (T2) of IPT. New CBCT analysis technique A, standardization, segmentation, and registration of T1 and T2 scans were performed using ITK-SNAP and 3D Slicer CMF to measure TD volume (mm3), density (gray-level intensity), and root length increase (mm). In the traditional CBCT analysis technique B, analyses were conducted using the In-Vivo software to calculate TD thickness (mm), radiodensity (HU%), and root length increase (mm). Paired t-test and the intraclass correlation coefficient were calculated to compare and assess the reliability of all techniques.

Results: No significant difference between the two techniques existed in the measurement of TD mineral density (Mean [SD]:A = 22.4 [15.4]; B = 24.4 [15.4]; p = .47). Technique A resulted in significantly higher root length increase values (Mean [SD]: A = 1.3 [0.6]; B = 1.1 [0.5]; p = .03). The two techniques showed acceptable reliability levels (0.76-0.99).

Conclusion: CBCT analysis techniques yielded similar findings for mineral density. The new CBCT volumetric analysis technique, although more laborious, produced higher values for root length increase, and allowed for measurement of dentin volume.

两种 CBCT 分析技术与传统根尖周炎 X 光片在评估年轻恒牙间接盖髓后三级牙本质方面的比较。
背景和目的:比较两种锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)分析技术,以测量年轻恒牙间接牙髓治疗(IPT)后三级牙本质(TD)的体积、密度和根长增加情况:设计:比较研究设计:69幅CBCT扫描图分别在IPT初期(T1)和1年后(T2)拍摄。采用新的 CBCT 分析技术 A,使用 ITK-SNAP 和 3D Slicer CMF 对 T1 和 T2 扫描进行标准化、分割和配准,以测量 TD 体积(立方毫米)、密度(灰度级强度)和根长增加(毫米)。在传统的 CBCT 分析技术 B 中,使用 In-Vivo 软件进行分析,计算 TD 厚度(毫米)、放射密度(HU%)和根长增加(毫米)。计算了配对 t 检验和类内相关系数,以比较和评估所有技术的可靠性:结果:两种技术在测量 TD 矿物密度方面无明显差异(平均值 [SD]: A = 22.4 [15.4];B = 24.4 [15.4];P = .47)。技术 A 的根长增加值明显更高(平均值 [SD]: A = 1.3 [0.6]; B = 1.1 [0.5]; p = .03)。两种技术的可靠性水平(0.76-0.99)均可接受:结论:CBCT 分析技术得出的矿物质密度结果相似。新的 CBCT 体积分析技术虽然更费力,但能得出更高的牙根长度增加值,并能测量牙本质体积。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry was formed in 1991 by the merger of the Journals of the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry and the British Society of Paediatric Dentistry and is published bi-monthly. It has true international scope and aims to promote the highest standard of education, practice and research in paediatric dentistry world-wide. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry publishes papers on all aspects of paediatric dentistry including: growth and development, behaviour management, diagnosis, prevention, restorative treatment and issue relating to medically compromised children or those with disabilities. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, reviews, case reports, clinical techniques, short communications and abstracts of current paediatric dental research. Analytical studies with a scientific novelty value are preferred to descriptive studies. Case reports illustrating unusual conditions and clinically relevant observations are acceptable but must be of sufficiently high quality to be considered for publication; particularly the illustrative material must be of the highest quality.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信