When performing actions with robots, attribution of intentionality affects the sense of joint agency

IF 26.1 1区 计算机科学 Q1 ROBOTICS
Uma Prashant Navare, Francesca Ciardo, Kyveli Kompatsiari, Davide De Tommaso, Agnieszka Wykowska
{"title":"When performing actions with robots, attribution of intentionality affects the sense of joint agency","authors":"Uma Prashant Navare,&nbsp;Francesca Ciardo,&nbsp;Kyveli Kompatsiari,&nbsp;Davide De Tommaso,&nbsp;Agnieszka Wykowska","doi":"10.1126/scirobotics.adj3665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div >Sense of joint agency (SoJA) is the sense of control experienced by humans when acting with others to bring about changes in the shared environment. SoJA is proposed to arise from the sensorimotor predictive processes underlying action control and monitoring. Because SoJA is a ubiquitous phenomenon occurring when we perform actions with other humans, it is of great interest and importance to understand whether—and under what conditions—SoJA occurs in collaborative tasks with humanoid robots. In this study, using behavioral measures and neural responses measured by electroencephalography (EEG), we aimed to evaluate whether SoJA occurs in joint action with the humanoid robot iCub and whether its emergence is influenced by the perceived intentionality of the robot. Behavioral results show that participants experienced SoJA with the robot partner when it was presented as an intentional agent but not when it was presented as a mechanical artifact. EEG results show that the mechanism that influences the emergence of SoJA in the condition when the robot is presented as an intentional agent is the ability to form similarly accurate predictions about the sensory consequences of our own and others’ actions, leading to similar modulatory activity over sensory processing. Together, our results shed light on the joint sensorimotor processing mechanisms underlying the emergence of SoJA in human-robot interaction and underscore the importance of attribution of intentionality to the robot in human-robot collaboration.</div>","PeriodicalId":56029,"journal":{"name":"Science Robotics","volume":"9 91","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":26.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science Robotics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/scirobotics.adj3665","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ROBOTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sense of joint agency (SoJA) is the sense of control experienced by humans when acting with others to bring about changes in the shared environment. SoJA is proposed to arise from the sensorimotor predictive processes underlying action control and monitoring. Because SoJA is a ubiquitous phenomenon occurring when we perform actions with other humans, it is of great interest and importance to understand whether—and under what conditions—SoJA occurs in collaborative tasks with humanoid robots. In this study, using behavioral measures and neural responses measured by electroencephalography (EEG), we aimed to evaluate whether SoJA occurs in joint action with the humanoid robot iCub and whether its emergence is influenced by the perceived intentionality of the robot. Behavioral results show that participants experienced SoJA with the robot partner when it was presented as an intentional agent but not when it was presented as a mechanical artifact. EEG results show that the mechanism that influences the emergence of SoJA in the condition when the robot is presented as an intentional agent is the ability to form similarly accurate predictions about the sensory consequences of our own and others’ actions, leading to similar modulatory activity over sensory processing. Together, our results shed light on the joint sensorimotor processing mechanisms underlying the emergence of SoJA in human-robot interaction and underscore the importance of attribution of intentionality to the robot in human-robot collaboration.
在与机器人共同完成动作时,意向性归属会影响共同代理感。
联合代理感(SoJA)是指人类在与他人共同行动以改变共同环境时所体验到的控制感。SoJA 的产生源于作为行动控制和监测基础的感觉运动预测过程。由于 SoJA 是我们与其他人一起行动时普遍存在的现象,因此了解在与仿人机器人协作任务中是否会出现 SoJA 以及在什么条件下会出现 SoJA 是非常有意义和重要的。在这项研究中,我们利用行为测量和脑电图(EEG)测量神经反应,旨在评估在与仿人机器人 iCub 共同行动时是否会出现 SoJA,以及 SoJA 的出现是否会受到机器人感知到的意向性的影响。行为结果表明,当机器人伙伴作为一个有意图的代理出现时,参与者会体验到 SoJA,而当机器人伙伴作为一个机械人工制品出现时,参与者则不会体验到 SoJA。脑电图结果表明,在机器人作为有意行为主体出现的情况下,影响 SoJA 出现的机制是,人们能够对自己和他人行为的感官后果形成类似的准确预测,从而对感官处理产生类似的调节活动。总之,我们的研究结果揭示了人机交互中出现 SoJA 所依据的联合感觉运动处理机制,并强调了在人机协作中将意向性归因于机器人的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Science Robotics
Science Robotics Mathematics-Control and Optimization
CiteScore
30.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Science Robotics publishes original, peer-reviewed, science- or engineering-based research articles that advance the field of robotics. The journal also features editor-commissioned Reviews. An international team of academic editors holds Science Robotics articles to the same high-quality standard that is the hallmark of the Science family of journals. Sub-topics include: actuators, advanced materials, artificial Intelligence, autonomous vehicles, bio-inspired design, exoskeletons, fabrication, field robotics, human-robot interaction, humanoids, industrial robotics, kinematics, machine learning, material science, medical technology, motion planning and control, micro- and nano-robotics, multi-robot control, sensors, service robotics, social and ethical issues, soft robotics, and space, planetary and undersea exploration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信