Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by ultrasonography for laparoscopic surgery in patients with past abdominal surgery with special reference to loose adhesion

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Hirohisa Okabe, Toshiro Masuda, Masahiro Tomita, Asuka Ono, Daisuke Kuroda, Hideyuki Kuroki, Hidetoshi Nitta, Taizo Hibi, Hideo Baba, Hiroki Sugita
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by ultrasonography for laparoscopic surgery in patients with past abdominal surgery with special reference to loose adhesion","authors":"Hirohisa Okabe,&nbsp;Toshiro Masuda,&nbsp;Masahiro Tomita,&nbsp;Asuka Ono,&nbsp;Daisuke Kuroda,&nbsp;Hideyuki Kuroki,&nbsp;Hidetoshi Nitta,&nbsp;Taizo Hibi,&nbsp;Hideo Baba,&nbsp;Hiroki Sugita","doi":"10.1111/ases.13332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Endoscopic surgery is widely accepted for both elective and emergent abdominal surgery. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by abdominal ultrasonography (US).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Intra-abdominal intestinal adhesions on the abdominal wall in 50 patients with a history of abdominal surgery were prospectively assessed by the visceral slide test with US before laparoscopic surgery from 2019 to 2022. Adhesion was assessed in six separate abdominal zones during US. Actual adhesion on the abdominal wall was confirmed during laparoscopic surgery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The sliding distances in upper right, upper central, upper left, lower right, lower central, and lower left zones in patients with versus without intestinal adhesion were 4.4 versus 1.4 cm (<i>P</i> = .004), 3.4 versus 2.5 cm, 4.3 versus 1.3 cm (<i>P</i> = .011), 3.1 versus 1.5 cm (<i>P</i> = .0014), 3.3 versus 1.1 cm (<i>P</i> = .013), and 3.4 versus 0.8 cm (<i>P</i> = .0061), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the optimal value of sliding distance as 2.5 cm and the area under the curve as 0.86. The specificity of US assessment of adhesion was lower in the central zone than in lateral zones. Loose adhesion mostly seen around the scar was attributed to either filmy tissue or omental adhesion, leading to visceral sliding during US.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study revealed the reason for insufficient accuracy of preoperative US assessment of intestinal adhesion around the scar area because of loose adhesion. The upper lateral area might be optimal for first port insertion.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13332","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Endoscopic surgery is widely accepted for both elective and emergent abdominal surgery. This study was performed to assess the accuracy of preoperative adhesion mapping by abdominal ultrasonography (US).

Methods

Intra-abdominal intestinal adhesions on the abdominal wall in 50 patients with a history of abdominal surgery were prospectively assessed by the visceral slide test with US before laparoscopic surgery from 2019 to 2022. Adhesion was assessed in six separate abdominal zones during US. Actual adhesion on the abdominal wall was confirmed during laparoscopic surgery.

Results

The sliding distances in upper right, upper central, upper left, lower right, lower central, and lower left zones in patients with versus without intestinal adhesion were 4.4 versus 1.4 cm (P = .004), 3.4 versus 2.5 cm, 4.3 versus 1.3 cm (P = .011), 3.1 versus 1.5 cm (P = .0014), 3.3 versus 1.1 cm (P = .013), and 3.4 versus 0.8 cm (P = .0061), respectively. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed the optimal value of sliding distance as 2.5 cm and the area under the curve as 0.86. The specificity of US assessment of adhesion was lower in the central zone than in lateral zones. Loose adhesion mostly seen around the scar was attributed to either filmy tissue or omental adhesion, leading to visceral sliding during US.

Conclusion

This study revealed the reason for insufficient accuracy of preoperative US assessment of intestinal adhesion around the scar area because of loose adhesion. The upper lateral area might be optimal for first port insertion.

对既往接受过腹部手术的患者进行腹腔镜手术的术前超声波粘连测绘的诊断准确性,特别是松散粘连的诊断准确性。
目的:内窥镜手术被广泛用于择期和急诊腹部手术。本研究旨在评估通过腹部超声波(US)绘制术前粘连图的准确性:方法:2019 年至 2022 年,对 50 名有腹部手术史的患者腹壁上的腹腔内肠粘连进行了前瞻性评估,在腹腔镜手术前使用 US 进行内脏滑动试验。腹腔镜检查时评估了六个独立腹腔区域的粘连情况。腹腔镜手术时确认腹壁上的实际粘连情况:结果:有肠粘连与无肠粘连患者的右上区、中央上区、左上区、右下区、中央下区和左下区的滑动距离分别为 4.4 对 1.4 厘米(P = .004)、3.4 对 2.5 厘米、4.3 对 1.3 厘米(P = .011)、3.1 对 1.5 厘米(P = .0014)、3.3 对 1.1 厘米(P = .013)和 3.4 对 0.8 厘米(P = .0061)。接收者操作特征分析显示滑动距离的最佳值为 2.5 厘米,曲线下面积为 0.86。US 评估粘连的特异性在中央区低于外侧区。松散粘连多见于疤痕周围,其原因是纤维组织或网膜粘连,导致 US 评估时内脏滑动:本研究揭示了由于松散粘连导致术前 US 评估疤痕周围肠粘连准确性不足的原因。上外侧区域可能是首次插入端口的最佳位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信