MethOxyfluraNe in InTerventiOnal Radiology (MONITOR): A randomised controlled trial

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ross Copping, Paul Balamon, Marcus Lau, Jules Catt, Glen Schlaphoff
{"title":"MethOxyfluraNe in InTerventiOnal Radiology (MONITOR): A randomised controlled trial","authors":"Ross Copping,&nbsp;Paul Balamon,&nbsp;Marcus Lau,&nbsp;Jules Catt,&nbsp;Glen Schlaphoff","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.13726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Procedural sedation and pain management in interventional radiology (IR) are of critical importance to successful outcomes but remain under-researched. Methoxyflurane has been previously used in some minor procedures with several advantages including rapid onset and offset and a good safety profile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate methoxyflurane for procedures in IR.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed between October 2021 and November 2022. Patients presenting for portacath insertion, portacath removal or solid organ biopsy were randomised to either methoxyflurane or placebo. Three hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled in total. Patients were supplied with one Penthrox inhaler containing either 3 mL methoxyflurane or placebo. The primary endpoints of the study were change in pain and anxiety scores compared with baseline, measured on a standardised visual analogue scale (VAS) pre-procedure, at 5-min intervals during the procedure and post-procedure. Baselines scores were controlled for in the statistical analysis. Safety analysis was also performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>One hundred and sixty-nine patients received methoxyflurane and 145 received placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The methoxyflurane group had lower pain and anxiety scores throughout the procedure (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) with 2.5 times less pain (VAS 1.08/10) and 1.6 times less anxiety (VAS 0.97/10) on average. Lower post-procedure pain (mean 0.72 vs 1.44; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001) and anxiety (mean 0.55 vs 1.13; <i>P</i> = 0.008) were also observed with methoxyflurane. There were no drug or major procedure-related adverse events.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The results of this study suggest that methoxyflurane provides safe and effective analgesia and anxiolysis for some procedures in IR.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":"68 6","pages":"705-713"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1754-9485.13726","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1754-9485.13726","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Procedural sedation and pain management in interventional radiology (IR) are of critical importance to successful outcomes but remain under-researched. Methoxyflurane has been previously used in some minor procedures with several advantages including rapid onset and offset and a good safety profile. The purpose of this study was to evaluate methoxyflurane for procedures in IR.

Methods

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was performed between October 2021 and November 2022. Patients presenting for portacath insertion, portacath removal or solid organ biopsy were randomised to either methoxyflurane or placebo. Three hundred and fourteen patients were enrolled in total. Patients were supplied with one Penthrox inhaler containing either 3 mL methoxyflurane or placebo. The primary endpoints of the study were change in pain and anxiety scores compared with baseline, measured on a standardised visual analogue scale (VAS) pre-procedure, at 5-min intervals during the procedure and post-procedure. Baselines scores were controlled for in the statistical analysis. Safety analysis was also performed.

Results

One hundred and sixty-nine patients received methoxyflurane and 145 received placebo. Baseline characteristics were similar between the two groups. The methoxyflurane group had lower pain and anxiety scores throughout the procedure (P < 0.001) with 2.5 times less pain (VAS 1.08/10) and 1.6 times less anxiety (VAS 0.97/10) on average. Lower post-procedure pain (mean 0.72 vs 1.44; P < 0.001) and anxiety (mean 0.55 vs 1.13; P = 0.008) were also observed with methoxyflurane. There were no drug or major procedure-related adverse events.

Conclusion

The results of this study suggest that methoxyflurane provides safe and effective analgesia and anxiolysis for some procedures in IR.

Abstract Image

放射学中的甲氧氟沙星(MONITOR):随机对照试验。
导言:介入放射学(IR)中的程序镇静和疼痛管理对成功结果至关重要,但研究仍然不足。甲氧基氟烷以前曾用于一些小手术,具有起效快、可抵消、安全性好等优点。本研究的目的是对红外手术中的甲氧基氟烷进行评估:方法:2021 年 10 月至 2022 年 11 月期间进行了一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。接受门插管插入、门插管移除或实体器官活检的患者被随机分配到甲氧氟烷或安慰剂中。共有 314 名患者入选。患者将获得一个含有 3 毫升甲氧氟醚或安慰剂的 Penthrox 吸入器。研究的主要终点是疼痛和焦虑评分与基线相比的变化,测量方法为术前、术中和术后每隔 5 分钟使用一次标准化视觉模拟量表 (VAS)。统计分析中对基线分数进行了控制。此外,还进行了安全性分析:169 名患者接受了甲氧氟烷治疗,145 名患者接受了安慰剂治疗。两组患者的基线特征相似。在整个手术过程中,甲氧氟烷组的疼痛和焦虑评分较低(P 结论:甲氧氟烷是一种有效的镇痛剂:本研究结果表明,甲氧氟烷可为红外部分手术提供安全有效的镇痛和抗焦虑作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信