Corrigendum to “A systematic review on the impact of sub-epidermal moisture assessments on pressure ulcer/injury care delivery pathways”

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
{"title":"Corrigendum to “A systematic review on the impact of sub-epidermal moisture assessments on pressure ulcer/injury care delivery pathways”","authors":"","doi":"10.1111/iwj.14951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Avsar P, Patton D, Cuddigan J, Moore Z. A systematic review on the impact of sub-epidermal moisture assessments on pressure ulcer/injury care delivery pathways. Int Wound J. 2024;21(6):e14928. doi:10.1111/iwj.14928.</p><p>The PU incidence for the usual care group was incorrectly stated as 25%. It should be 2.5% (401/15790).</p><p>There is a statistically significant difference in visual PI/PU development in favour of the use of care pathways based on SEM assessments (PU incidence 1%, 27/2661, care pathway group, versus 2.5%, 401/15 790 usual care group).”</p><p>We apologise for this error.</p>","PeriodicalId":14451,"journal":{"name":"International Wound Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/iwj.14951","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Wound Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/iwj.14951","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Avsar P, Patton D, Cuddigan J, Moore Z. A systematic review on the impact of sub-epidermal moisture assessments on pressure ulcer/injury care delivery pathways. Int Wound J. 2024;21(6):e14928. doi:10.1111/iwj.14928.

The PU incidence for the usual care group was incorrectly stated as 25%. It should be 2.5% (401/15790).

There is a statistically significant difference in visual PI/PU development in favour of the use of care pathways based on SEM assessments (PU incidence 1%, 27/2661, care pathway group, versus 2.5%, 401/15 790 usual care group).”

We apologise for this error.

关于 "表皮下湿度评估对压疮/损伤护理路径影响的系统性审查 "的更正
Avsar P、Patton D、Cuddigan J、Moore Z.表皮下湿度评估对压疮/损伤护理路径影响的系统综述。Int Wound J. 2024;21(6):e14928. doi:10.1111/wiwj.14928.常规护理组的压疮发生率被错误地表述为 25%。基于SEM评估的护理路径在视觉PI/PU发展方面存在显著统计学差异(护理路径组PU发生率为1%,27/2661;常规护理组PU发生率为2.5%,401/15 790)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Wound Journal
International Wound Journal DERMATOLOGY-SURGERY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.90%
发文量
266
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Editors welcome papers on all aspects of prevention and treatment of wounds and associated conditions in the fields of surgery, dermatology, oncology, nursing, radiotherapy, physical therapy, occupational therapy and podiatry. The Journal accepts papers in the following categories: - Research papers - Review articles - Clinical studies - Letters - News and Views: international perspectives, education initiatives, guidelines and different activities of groups and societies. Calendar of events The Editors are supported by a board of international experts and a panel of reviewers across a range of disciplines and specialties which ensures only the most current and relevant research is published.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信