Time of Day and Sleep Deprivation Effects on Risky Decision Making.

IF 2.1 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Noelia Ruiz-Herrera, Mia Friedman, Melissa A St Hilaire, Arturo Arrona-Palacios, Charles A Czeisler, Jeanne F Duffy
{"title":"Time of Day and Sleep Deprivation Effects on Risky Decision Making.","authors":"Noelia Ruiz-Herrera, Mia Friedman, Melissa A St Hilaire, Arturo Arrona-Palacios, Charles A Czeisler, Jeanne F Duffy","doi":"10.3390/clockssleep6020020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Previous research has revealed that daily variations in human neurobehavioral functions are driven in part by the endogenous circadian system. The objective of this study was to explore whether there exists a circadian influence on performance regarding a risky decision-making task and to determine whether the performance changes with sleep deprivation (SD). Thirteen participants underwent a 39 h constant routine (CR) protocol, during which they remained awake in constant conditions and performed the BART (balloon analogue risk task) every two hours. The mean pumps (gains) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and balloons popped (losses) (<i>p</i> = 0.003) exhibited variation during the CR. The reaction time (RT) also showed significant variation across the CR (<i>p</i> < 0.001), with slower mean RTs in the morning hours following SD. A greater risk propensity was observed around midday before SD and a lower risk propensity after 29.5 h of being awake. The sensitivity to punishment varied during the CR, but did not follow a predictable trend. Further research using real monetary incentives and neurophysiological measures is warranted to elucidate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":33568,"journal":{"name":"Clocks & Sleep","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11202614/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clocks & Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/clockssleep6020020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Previous research has revealed that daily variations in human neurobehavioral functions are driven in part by the endogenous circadian system. The objective of this study was to explore whether there exists a circadian influence on performance regarding a risky decision-making task and to determine whether the performance changes with sleep deprivation (SD). Thirteen participants underwent a 39 h constant routine (CR) protocol, during which they remained awake in constant conditions and performed the BART (balloon analogue risk task) every two hours. The mean pumps (gains) (p < 0.001) and balloons popped (losses) (p = 0.003) exhibited variation during the CR. The reaction time (RT) also showed significant variation across the CR (p < 0.001), with slower mean RTs in the morning hours following SD. A greater risk propensity was observed around midday before SD and a lower risk propensity after 29.5 h of being awake. The sensitivity to punishment varied during the CR, but did not follow a predictable trend. Further research using real monetary incentives and neurophysiological measures is warranted to elucidate these findings.

时间和睡眠不足对风险决策的影响
以往的研究表明,人类神经行为功能的日常变化部分是由内源性昼夜节律系统驱动的。本研究旨在探讨昼夜节律是否会影响风险决策任务的表现,并确定睡眠剥夺(SD)是否会改变表现。13名参与者接受了39小时的恒定常规(CR)方案,在此期间,他们在恒定条件下保持清醒,每两小时进行一次气球模拟风险任务(BART)。CR期间,平均抽气量(增益)(p < 0.001)和气球破裂量(损失)(p = 0.003)出现了变化。反应时间(RT)在整个 CR 期间也有显著变化(p < 0.001),在 SD 后的上午,平均反应时间较慢。在自毁前的中午前后观察到更大的风险倾向,而在清醒 29.5 小时后观察到更小的风险倾向。对惩罚的敏感度在 CR 期间有所变化,但并不遵循可预测的趋势。为了阐明这些发现,有必要使用真实的货币激励和神经生理学测量方法进行进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clocks & Sleep
Clocks & Sleep Multiple-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信