[State-organized healthcare instead of patient-organized?]

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Urologie Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1007/s00120-024-02377-5
Josef Hecken
{"title":"[State-organized healthcare instead of patient-organized?]","authors":"Josef Hecken","doi":"10.1007/s00120-024-02377-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The previous concept of self-administration as a regulatory body in healthcare in Germany has been repeatedly called into question by politicians. Different approaches can be recognized in various examples. In the author's view, healthcare provision based on legal ordinances and action geared towards legislative periods cannot replace the solutions found by self-administration-neither in terms of content, expertise nor quality. It is precisely the separation of roles and responsibilities between the state and self-administration that has so far ensured that decisions are made close to the healthcare system in order to further develop the healthcare system in Germany based on evidence and without losing sight of the costs.</p>","PeriodicalId":29782,"journal":{"name":"Urologie","volume":" ","pages":"761-767"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-024-02377-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The previous concept of self-administration as a regulatory body in healthcare in Germany has been repeatedly called into question by politicians. Different approaches can be recognized in various examples. In the author's view, healthcare provision based on legal ordinances and action geared towards legislative periods cannot replace the solutions found by self-administration-neither in terms of content, expertise nor quality. It is precisely the separation of roles and responsibilities between the state and self-administration that has so far ensured that decisions are made close to the healthcare system in order to further develop the healthcare system in Germany based on evidence and without losing sight of the costs.

[国家组织的医疗保健,而不是患者组织的医疗保健?]
在德国,以往作为医疗监管机构的自我管理理念一再受到政治家的质疑。在不同的例子中可以看到不同的方法。笔者认为,以法律条例为基础的医疗服务和以立法期为目标的行动,无论在内容、专业性还是质量方面,都无法取代自我管理所找到的解决方案。迄今为止,正是国家与自治机构之间的角色和责任分工,确保了在医疗保健系统附近做出决策,以便在不忽视成本的情况下,以证据为基础进一步发展德国的医疗保健系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Urologie
Urologie UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信