Evaluation of body shape as a human body composition assessment in isolated conditions and remote environments.

Abstract

Individuals in isolated and extreme environments can experience debilitating side-effects including significant decreases in fat-free mass (FFM) from disuse and inadequate nutrition. The objective of this study was to determine the strengths and weaknesses of three-dimensional optical (3DO) imaging for monitoring body composition in either simulated or actual remote environments. Thirty healthy adults (ASTRO, male = 15) and twenty-two Antarctic Expeditioners (ABCS, male = 18) were assessed for body composition. ASTRO participants completed duplicate 3DO scans while standing and inverted by gravity boots plus a single dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan. The inverted scans were an analog for fluid redistribution from gravity changes. An existing body composition model was used to estimate fat mass (FM) and FFM from 3DO meshes. 3DO body composition estimates were compared to DXA with linear regression and reported with the coefficient of determination (R²) and root mean square error (RMSE). ABCS participants received only duplicate 3DO scans on a monthly basis. Standing ASTRO meshes achieved an R² of 0.76 and 0.97 with an RMSE of 2.62 and 2.04 kg for FM and FFM, while inverted meshes achieved an R² of 0.52 and 0.93 with an RMSE of 2.84 and 3.23 kg for FM and FFM, respectively, compared to DXA. For the ABCS arm, mean weight, FM, and FFM changes were -0.47, 0.06, and -0.54 kg, respectively. Simulated fluid redistribution decreased the accuracy of estimated body composition values from 3DO scans. However, FFM stayed robust. 3DO imaging showed good absolute accuracy for body composition assessment in isolated and remote environments.