Antiplatelet Resistance in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review.

Surgery Research and Practice Pub Date : 2024-06-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1155/2024/1807241
Myat Soe Thet, Amir Khosravi, Samson Egbulonu, Aung Ye Oo
{"title":"Antiplatelet Resistance in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Myat Soe Thet, Amir Khosravi, Samson Egbulonu, Aung Ye Oo","doi":"10.1155/2024/1807241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review examines the occurrence and implications of resistance to primary antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel, often utilised in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), alongside the methodologies for assessment of such resistance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search across various databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL until May 2024 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antiplatelet resistance in on-pump and off-pump CABG patients. Following quality assessment, only high-quality studies were incorporated into this review.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This review included 19 studies with 3,915 patients, four of which were randomised controlled trials and 15 were observational studies. Aspirin resistance incidence ranged from 11.0% to 51.5%, while clopidogrel resistance was 22%. Antiplatelet resistance, assessed through a wide variety of methods, was associated with a 13 times increase in the risk of vein graft occlusion and increased rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation in the case of clopidogrel resistance. The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on antiplatelet resistance remains ambiguous.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The academic literature lacks a standardised definition for antiplatelet resistance. Assessment methodologies greatly vary, leading to noninterchangeable outcomes. While aspirin resistance has a conflicting overall significant impact on adverse outcomes, clopidogrel resistance correlates with poorer clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":30584,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Research and Practice","volume":"2024 ","pages":"1807241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11193597/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/1807241","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review examines the occurrence and implications of resistance to primary antiplatelet agents, aspirin and clopidogrel, often utilised in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), alongside the methodologies for assessment of such resistance.

Methods: An extensive literature search across various databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE via Ovid, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL until May 2024 was conducted to identify studies evaluating antiplatelet resistance in on-pump and off-pump CABG patients. Following quality assessment, only high-quality studies were incorporated into this review.

Results: This review included 19 studies with 3,915 patients, four of which were randomised controlled trials and 15 were observational studies. Aspirin resistance incidence ranged from 11.0% to 51.5%, while clopidogrel resistance was 22%. Antiplatelet resistance, assessed through a wide variety of methods, was associated with a 13 times increase in the risk of vein graft occlusion and increased rates of mortality, myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularisation in the case of clopidogrel resistance. The effect of cardiopulmonary bypass on antiplatelet resistance remains ambiguous.

Conclusion: The academic literature lacks a standardised definition for antiplatelet resistance. Assessment methodologies greatly vary, leading to noninterchangeable outcomes. While aspirin resistance has a conflicting overall significant impact on adverse outcomes, clopidogrel resistance correlates with poorer clinical outcomes.

冠状动脉旁路移植术中的抗血小板阻力:系统综述。
背景:本系统综述研究了冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者常用的主要抗血小板药物阿司匹林和氯吡格雷耐药的发生和影响,以及评估这种耐药的方法:在PubMed、通过Ovid检索的MEDLINE、Embase和Cochrane CENTRAL等各种数据库中进行了广泛的文献检索,直至2024年5月,以确定对泵上和泵下CABG患者抗血小板耐药性进行评估的研究。经过质量评估,本综述只纳入了高质量的研究:本综述共纳入 19 项研究,涉及 3915 名患者,其中 4 项为随机对照试验,15 项为观察性研究。阿司匹林耐药率从11.0%到51.5%不等,而氯吡格雷耐药率为22%。通过多种方法评估发现,抗血小板药物耐药与静脉移植闭塞风险增加13倍以及氯吡格雷耐药情况下死亡率、心肌梗死和靶血管血运重建率增加有关。心肺旁路对抗血小板作用的影响仍不明确:结论:学术文献对抗血小板抵抗缺乏统一的定义。结论:学术文献对抗血小板抵抗缺乏统一的定义,评估方法也大相径庭,导致结果不可互换。阿司匹林耐药对不良预后的总体显著影响相互矛盾,而氯吡格雷耐药则与较差的临床预后相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊介绍: Surgery Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that provides a forum for surgeons and the surgical research community. The journal publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies focusing on clinical and laboratory research relevant to surgical practice and teaching, with an emphasis on findings directly affecting surgical management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信