Comparative Study on the Satisfaction of Healthcare Service Providers with the Synergistic Development of Rural Healthcare Systems in China: Medical Alliance Counties vs. Non-Medical Alliance Counties.

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to explore whether the establishment of county medical alliances can improve satisfaction with the vertical integration of healthcare systems among rural medical and healthcare service provider managers and service providers. Our study also sought to provide recommendations for the sustainable development of vertical integration in healthcare systems.

Methods: A semi-structured interview with 30 healthcare service providers was employed in this research, and Nvivo software was utilized to analyze factors that influence vertical integration. From April to July 2021, a multi-stage random sampling method was used to select participants. The sample included two leading hospitals in medical consortia, 15 member units (healthcare service providers and medical staff), two county-level hospitals, and 15 township health centers/community healthcare service centers from non-medical consortia. Questionnaire surveys were conducted with these groups. Factor analysis was used to calculate satisfaction scores for healthcare service providers with the cross-institutional synergistic development of healthcare systems in both medical and non-medical consortia (denoted as M(IQR)). Propensity score matching was employed to reduce confounding factors between groups. The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare satisfaction differences between groups.

Results: The overall satisfaction scores for lead-county hospital managers, member institution managers, medical staff at the lead-county hospital, and medical staff at member institutions were 4.80 (1.00), 4.17 (1.17), 4.00 (1.38), and 4.00 (1.12), respectively. Lead-county hospital managers' satisfaction with cross-institutional collaboration, development capacity enhancement, and structure and resource integration in the Medical Alliance group showed higher satisfaction than the Non-Medical Alliance. Similarly, lead-county hospital medical staff in the Medical Alliance group reported greater satisfaction with collaboration efforts, supportive environment, and development capacity enhancement. Notably, while the Medical Alliance group's satisfaction scores were higher, the differences between the two groups were not statistically significant for lead-county hospital managers and medical staff. The Medical Alliance group did show statistically significant differences in member institution managers' satisfaction with collaboration, development capacity enhancement, and structure and resource integration. Additionally, medical staff of member institutions in the Medical Alliance group reported statistically significant higher satisfaction with collaboration, supportive environment, development capacity enhancement, healthcare service integration, and human resource development.

Conclusion: To facilitate the establishment of county medical alliances, managers of leading county-level hospitals should adopt a healthcare system integration strategy. This strategy involves evolution from being a member of a single institution to a coordinator of cross-institutional vertical integration of medical and healthcare services. Additionally, revamping remuneration and appraisal systems for members of county medical alliances is necessary. This will encourage cooperation among healthcare institutions within the three-tiered system and their medical staff, ultimately facilitating the provision of integrated services.