Comparison of Catheter Malposition Between Left and Right Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Subclavian Venous Catheterizations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 7.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-24 DOI:10.1097/CCM.0000000000006368
Kyung Won Shin, Seyong Park, Woo-Young Jo, Seungeun Choi, Yoon Jung Kim, Hee-Pyoung Park, Hyongmin Oh
{"title":"Comparison of Catheter Malposition Between Left and Right Ultrasound-Guided Infraclavicular Subclavian Venous Catheterizations: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Kyung Won Shin, Seyong Park, Woo-Young Jo, Seungeun Choi, Yoon Jung Kim, Hee-Pyoung Park, Hyongmin Oh","doi":"10.1097/CCM.0000000000006368","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Catheter malposition after subclavian venous catheterization (SVC) is not uncommon and can lead to serious complications. This study hypothesized that the left access is superior to the right access in terms of catheter malposition after ultrasound-guided infraclavicular SVC due to the asymmetry of the bilateral brachiocephalic veins.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Parallel-armed randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>A tertiary referral hospital in Korea.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Patients 20-79 years old who were scheduled to undergo SVC under general anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Patients were randomly assigned to either the left ( n = 224) or right ( n = 225) SVC group. The primary outcome measure was the overall catheter malposition rate. The secondary outcome measures included catheter malposition rates into the ipsilateral internal jugular and contralateral brachiocephalic veins, other catheterization-related complications, and catheterization performance.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>The catheter malposition rate was lower (10 [4.5%] vs. 31 [13.8%], p = 0.001), especially in the ipsilateral internal jugular vein (9 [4.0%] vs. 24 [10.7%], p = 0.007), in the left SVC group than in the right SVC group. In the left SVC group, catheterization success rates on the first pass (88 [39.3%] vs. 65 [28.9%], p = 0.020) and first-catheterization attempt (198 [88.4%] vs. 181 [80.4%], p = 0.020) were higher whereas times for vein visualization (30 s [18-50] vs. 20 s [13-38], p < 0.001) and total catheterization (134 s [113-182] vs. 132 s [103-170], p = 0.034) were longer. There were no significant differences in other catheterization performance and catheterization-related complications between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings strengthen the rationale for choosing the left access over the right access for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular SVC.</p>","PeriodicalId":10765,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1557-1566"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000006368","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Catheter malposition after subclavian venous catheterization (SVC) is not uncommon and can lead to serious complications. This study hypothesized that the left access is superior to the right access in terms of catheter malposition after ultrasound-guided infraclavicular SVC due to the asymmetry of the bilateral brachiocephalic veins.

Design: Parallel-armed randomized controlled trial.

Setting: A tertiary referral hospital in Korea.

Patients: Patients 20-79 years old who were scheduled to undergo SVC under general anesthesia.

Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned to either the left ( n = 224) or right ( n = 225) SVC group. The primary outcome measure was the overall catheter malposition rate. The secondary outcome measures included catheter malposition rates into the ipsilateral internal jugular and contralateral brachiocephalic veins, other catheterization-related complications, and catheterization performance.

Measurements and main results: The catheter malposition rate was lower (10 [4.5%] vs. 31 [13.8%], p = 0.001), especially in the ipsilateral internal jugular vein (9 [4.0%] vs. 24 [10.7%], p = 0.007), in the left SVC group than in the right SVC group. In the left SVC group, catheterization success rates on the first pass (88 [39.3%] vs. 65 [28.9%], p = 0.020) and first-catheterization attempt (198 [88.4%] vs. 181 [80.4%], p = 0.020) were higher whereas times for vein visualization (30 s [18-50] vs. 20 s [13-38], p < 0.001) and total catheterization (134 s [113-182] vs. 132 s [103-170], p = 0.034) were longer. There were no significant differences in other catheterization performance and catheterization-related complications between the two groups.

Conclusions: These findings strengthen the rationale for choosing the left access over the right access for ultrasound-guided infraclavicular SVC.

左侧和右侧超声引导锁骨下静脉导管置入导管错位的比较:随机对照试验。
目的:锁骨下静脉导管插入术(SVC)后导管错位并不少见,可导致严重并发症。本研究假设,由于双侧臂丛静脉不对称,超声引导锁骨下静脉置管术后导管错位的情况下,左侧入路优于右侧入路:平行臂随机对照试验:背景:韩国一家三级转诊医院:患者:20-79 岁、计划在全身麻醉下接受 SVC 手术的患者:患者被随机分配到左侧(n = 224)或右侧(n = 225)SVC组。主要结果指标是导管总体错位率。次要结果指标包括同侧颈内静脉和对侧肱脑静脉的导管错位率、其他导管插入相关并发症以及导管插入效果:左侧 SVC 组的导管错位率(10 [4.5%] vs. 31 [13.8%],p = 0.001)低于右侧 SVC 组,尤其是同侧颈内静脉(9 [4.0%] vs. 24 [10.7%],p = 0.007)。左侧 SVC 组首次导管插入成功率(88 [39.3%] vs. 65 [28.9%],P = 0.020)和首次导管插入尝试成功率(198 [88.4%] vs. 181 [80.4%],P = 0.020)更高,而静脉显像时间(30 秒 [18-50] vs. 20 秒 [13-38],p < 0.001)和总导管插入时间(134 秒 [113-182] vs. 132 秒 [103-170],p = 0.034)更长。两组患者在其他导管操作和导管相关并发症方面没有明显差异:这些发现加强了超声引导锁骨下 SVC 选择左侧入路而非右侧入路的合理性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care Medicine
Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
16.30
自引率
5.70%
发文量
728
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care Medicine is the premier peer-reviewed, scientific publication in critical care medicine. Directed to those specialists who treat patients in the ICU and CCU, including chest physicians, surgeons, pediatricians, pharmacists/pharmacologists, anesthesiologists, critical care nurses, and other healthcare professionals, Critical Care Medicine covers all aspects of acute and emergency care for the critically ill or injured patient. Each issue presents critical care practitioners with clinical breakthroughs that lead to better patient care, the latest news on promising research, and advances in equipment and techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信