Impact of intensive blood pressure lowering after multiple-attempt endovascular thrombectomy: A secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jae Wook Jung, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jaeseob Yun, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, Hyung Lee, In Hwan Lim, Soon-Ho Hong, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Kyung-Yul Lee, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam
{"title":"Impact of intensive blood pressure lowering after multiple-attempt endovascular thrombectomy: A secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial.","authors":"Jae Wook Jung, Kwang Hyun Kim, Jaeseob Yun, Young Dae Kim, JoonNyung Heo, Hyungwoo Lee, Jin Kyo Choi, Hyung Lee, In Hwan Lim, Soon-Ho Hong, Byung Moon Kim, Dong Joon Kim, Na Young Shin, Bang-Hoon Cho, Seong Hwan Ahn, Hyungjong Park, Sung-Il Sohn, Jeong-Ho Hong, Tae-Jin Song, Yoonkyung Chang, Gyu Sik Kim, Kwon-Duk Seo, Kijeong Lee, Jun Young Chang, Jung Hwa Seo, Sukyoon Lee, Jang-Hyun Baek, Han-Jin Cho, Dong Hoon Shin, Jinkwon Kim, Joonsang Yoo, Minyoul Baik, Kyung-Yul Lee, Yo Han Jung, Yang-Ha Hwang, Chi Kyung Kim, Jae Guk Kim, Chan Joo Lee, Sungha Park, Soyoung Jeon, Hye Sun Lee, Sun U Kwon, Oh Young Bang, Ji Hoe Heo, Hyo Suk Nam","doi":"10.1177/17474930241265652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multiple attempts of thrombectomy have been linked to a higher risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and worsened functional outcomes, potentially influenced by blood pressure (BP) management strategies. Nonetheless, the impact of intensive BP management following successful recanalization through multiple attempts remains uncertain.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This study aimed to investigate whether conventional and intensive BP managements differentially affect outcomes according to multiple-attempt recanalization (MAR) and first-attempt recanalization (FAR) groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial, which was a comparison of intensive (systolic BP target: <140 mm Hg) and conventional (systolic BP target = 140-180 mm Hg) BP managements during the 24 h after successful recanalization, we included intention-to-treat population of the trial. Patients were divided into the MAR and the FAR groups. We examined a potential interaction between the number of thrombectomy attempts (MAR and FAR groups) and the effect of BP managements on clinical and safety outcomes. The primary outcome was functional independence at 3 months. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 36 h and mortality within 3 months.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 305 patients (median = 75 years), 102 (33.4%) were in the MAR group and 203 (66.6%) were in the FAR group. The intensive BP management was significantly associated with a lower rate of functional independence in the MAR group (intensive, 32.7% vs conventional, 54.9%, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.12-0.90, <i>p</i> = 0.03). In the FAR group, the proportion of patients with functional independence was not significantly different between the BP managements (intensive, 42.5% vs conventional, 54.2%, adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.38-1.40). Incidences of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality rates were not significantly different according to the BP managements in both MAR and FAR groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among stroke patients who received multiple attempts of thrombectomy, intensive BP management for 24 h resulted in a reduced chance of functional independence at 3 months and did not reduce symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following successful reperfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":14442,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stroke","volume":" ","pages":"17474930241265652"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stroke","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930241265652","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multiple attempts of thrombectomy have been linked to a higher risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and worsened functional outcomes, potentially influenced by blood pressure (BP) management strategies. Nonetheless, the impact of intensive BP management following successful recanalization through multiple attempts remains uncertain.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate whether conventional and intensive BP managements differentially affect outcomes according to multiple-attempt recanalization (MAR) and first-attempt recanalization (FAR) groups.

Methods: In this secondary analysis of the OPTIMAL-BP trial, which was a comparison of intensive (systolic BP target: <140 mm Hg) and conventional (systolic BP target = 140-180 mm Hg) BP managements during the 24 h after successful recanalization, we included intention-to-treat population of the trial. Patients were divided into the MAR and the FAR groups. We examined a potential interaction between the number of thrombectomy attempts (MAR and FAR groups) and the effect of BP managements on clinical and safety outcomes. The primary outcome was functional independence at 3 months. Safety outcomes were symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage within 36 h and mortality within 3 months.

Results: Of the 305 patients (median = 75 years), 102 (33.4%) were in the MAR group and 203 (66.6%) were in the FAR group. The intensive BP management was significantly associated with a lower rate of functional independence in the MAR group (intensive, 32.7% vs conventional, 54.9%, adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 0.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.12-0.90, p = 0.03). In the FAR group, the proportion of patients with functional independence was not significantly different between the BP managements (intensive, 42.5% vs conventional, 54.2%, adjusted OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.38-1.40). Incidences of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and mortality rates were not significantly different according to the BP managements in both MAR and FAR groups.

Conclusions: Among stroke patients who received multiple attempts of thrombectomy, intensive BP management for 24 h resulted in a reduced chance of functional independence at 3 months and did not reduce symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage following successful reperfusion.

多次尝试血管内血栓切除术后强化降压的影响:OPTIMAL-BP 试验的二次分析。
背景:多次尝试血栓切除术与较高的脑内出血风险和功能预后恶化有关,这可能受到血压(BP)管理策略的影响。目的:本研究旨在根据多次尝试再通栓(MAR)组和首次尝试再通栓(FAR)组,探讨常规和强化血压管理是否会对预后产生不同影响:在这项对 OPTIMAL-BP 试验进行的二次分析中,对强化(收缩压目标值)和常规(收缩压目标值)血压管理结果进行了比较:在 305 名患者(中位数 75 岁)中,102 人(33.4%)属于 MAR 组,203 人(66.6%)属于 FAR 组。在 MAR 组中,强化血压管理与较低的功能独立率明显相关(强化组 32.7% 对常规组 54.9%,调整 OR 0.33,95% CI 0.12-0.90,p = 0.03)。在 FAR 组中,不同血压管理方法下功能独立的患者比例无明显差异(强化治疗 42.5%,常规治疗 54.2%,调整 OR 0.73,95% CI 0.38-1.40)。MAR组和FAR组的症状性脑出血发生率和死亡率在不同血压管理下没有明显差异:结论:在多次尝试血栓切除术的脑卒中患者中,24 小时的强化血压管理会降低患者 3 个月后功能独立的几率,并且不会减少再灌注成功后的症状性脑内出血。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Stroke
International Journal of Stroke 医学-外周血管病
CiteScore
13.90
自引率
6.00%
发文量
132
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Stroke is a welcome addition to the international stroke journal landscape in that it concentrates on the clinical aspects of stroke with basic science contributions in areas of clinical interest. Reviews of current topics are broadly based to encompass not only recent advances of global interest but also those which may be more important in certain regions and the journal regularly features items of news interest from all parts of the world. To facilitate the international nature of the journal, our Associate Editors from Europe, Asia, North America and South America coordinate segments of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信