Ramps first – Interpreting thrust nucleation in multilayers

IF 2.6 2区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Phoebe R. Sleath, Clare E. Bond, Robert W.H. Butler
{"title":"Ramps first – Interpreting thrust nucleation in multilayers","authors":"Phoebe R. Sleath,&nbsp;Clare E. Bond,&nbsp;Robert W.H. Butler","doi":"10.1016/j.jsg.2024.105190","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Models are key for geoscientists working in subsurface fold thrust belts, who want to interpret complex geometries. However, models based on a few landmark outcrop studies dominate interpretation. In these models thrust faults form first as flats along weaker beds and propagate upwards, producing a “hard linked”, fully connected thrust fault structure. The Eisenstadt and De Paor (1987) model challenges the conventional thrust flat-first, reflecting field observations which show that fold thrust outcrops vary remarkably from each other, with a variety of geometric, linkage, and stratigraphic behaviours.</p><p>Here we investigate an outcrop of thrusted sediments at St Brides Haven, Pembrokeshire. Structural observations of the outcrop show an imbricated stack, where isolated thrusts have developed within and localised along sandstone layers. The outcrop provides an example of the alternative Eisenstadt and De Paor model of ramps first. But here deformation in the encasing ‘soft’ mudstone layers is accommodate by homogeneous shortening.</p><p>We suggest that the prevalence of “hard linked” thrust models is a bias towards conventional models and that promotion of a greater variety of fold thrust structures, geometries and evolution styles is needed to ensure a broader range of interpretations and evolutionary understanding that better reflects reality.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Structural Geology","volume":"185 ","pages":"Article 105190"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001421/pdfft?md5=e4ff3d45dfdb36b1e9f1f3f31c9a831e&pid=1-s2.0-S0191814124001421-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Structural Geology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0191814124001421","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Models are key for geoscientists working in subsurface fold thrust belts, who want to interpret complex geometries. However, models based on a few landmark outcrop studies dominate interpretation. In these models thrust faults form first as flats along weaker beds and propagate upwards, producing a “hard linked”, fully connected thrust fault structure. The Eisenstadt and De Paor (1987) model challenges the conventional thrust flat-first, reflecting field observations which show that fold thrust outcrops vary remarkably from each other, with a variety of geometric, linkage, and stratigraphic behaviours.

Here we investigate an outcrop of thrusted sediments at St Brides Haven, Pembrokeshire. Structural observations of the outcrop show an imbricated stack, where isolated thrusts have developed within and localised along sandstone layers. The outcrop provides an example of the alternative Eisenstadt and De Paor model of ramps first. But here deformation in the encasing ‘soft’ mudstone layers is accommodate by homogeneous shortening.

We suggest that the prevalence of “hard linked” thrust models is a bias towards conventional models and that promotion of a greater variety of fold thrust structures, geometries and evolution styles is needed to ensure a broader range of interpretations and evolutionary understanding that better reflects reality.

坡道优先--解读多层膜中的推力成核现象
对于在地下褶皱推力带工作的地球科学家来说,要解释复杂的几何结构,模型是关键。然而,基于一些标志性露头研究的模型在解释中占主导地位。在这些模型中,推断断层首先沿着较薄弱的岩床形成,然后向上扩展,形成 "硬连接"、完全连接的推断断层结构。艾森斯塔特和德保罗(Eisenstadt and De Paor,1987 年)的模型挑战了传统的先平推断层,反映了实地观察结果,即褶皱推断层露头彼此差异显著,具有各种几何、连接和地层行为。对该露头的结构观察显示出一个交错的堆积层,其中孤立的推力在砂岩层内形成并沿砂岩层局部分布。该露头岩层为艾森斯塔特和德保尔(Eisenstadt and De Paor)的斜坡先行模型提供了一个可供选择的实例。我们认为,"硬连接 "推力模型的盛行是对传统模型的一种偏见,需要推广更多样化的褶皱推力结构、几何形状和演化风格,以确保更广泛的解释和演化理解,从而更好地反映现实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Structural Geology
Journal of Structural Geology 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
19.40%
发文量
192
审稿时长
15.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Structural Geology publishes process-oriented investigations about structural geology using appropriate combinations of analog and digital field data, seismic reflection data, satellite-derived data, geometric analysis, kinematic analysis, laboratory experiments, computer visualizations, and analogue or numerical modelling on all scales. Contributions are encouraged to draw perspectives from rheology, rock mechanics, geophysics,metamorphism, sedimentology, petroleum geology, economic geology, geodynamics, planetary geology, tectonics and neotectonics to provide a more powerful understanding of deformation processes and systems. Given the visual nature of the discipline, supplementary materials that portray the data and analysis in 3-D or quasi 3-D manners, including the use of videos, and/or graphical abstracts can significantly strengthen the impact of contributions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信