Genetic counselling legislation and practice in cancer in EU Member States.

IF 3.7 3区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
J Matt McCrary, Els Van Valckenborgh, Hélène A Poirel, Robin de Putter, Jeroen van Rooij, Denis Horgan, Marie-Luise Dierks, Olga Antonova, Joan Brunet, Adela Chirita-Emandi, Chrystelle Colas, Miriam Dalmas, Hans Ehrencrona, Claire Grima, Ramūnas Janavičius, Barbara Klink, Katalin Koczok, Mateja Krajc, Baiba Lace, Liis Leitsalu, Martin Mistrik, Milena Paneque, Dragan Primorac, Katharina M Roetzer, Joelle Ronez, Lucie Slámová, Elena Spanou, Kostas Stamatopoulos, Tomasz Stoklosa, Sonja Strang-Karlsson, Katalin Szakszon, Krzysztof Szczałuba, Jacqueline Turner, Marieke F van Dooren, Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams, Loredana-Maria Vassallo, Karin A W Wadt, Tamara Žigman, Tim Ripperger, Maurizio Genuardi, Marc Van den Bulcke, Anke Katharina Bergmann
{"title":"Genetic counselling legislation and practice in cancer in EU Member States.","authors":"J Matt McCrary, Els Van Valckenborgh, Hélène A Poirel, Robin de Putter, Jeroen van Rooij, Denis Horgan, Marie-Luise Dierks, Olga Antonova, Joan Brunet, Adela Chirita-Emandi, Chrystelle Colas, Miriam Dalmas, Hans Ehrencrona, Claire Grima, Ramūnas Janavičius, Barbara Klink, Katalin Koczok, Mateja Krajc, Baiba Lace, Liis Leitsalu, Martin Mistrik, Milena Paneque, Dragan Primorac, Katharina M Roetzer, Joelle Ronez, Lucie Slámová, Elena Spanou, Kostas Stamatopoulos, Tomasz Stoklosa, Sonja Strang-Karlsson, Katalin Szakszon, Krzysztof Szczałuba, Jacqueline Turner, Marieke F van Dooren, Wendy A G van Zelst-Stams, Loredana-Maria Vassallo, Karin A W Wadt, Tamara Žigman, Tim Ripperger, Maurizio Genuardi, Marc Van den Bulcke, Anke Katharina Bergmann","doi":"10.1093/eurpub/ckae093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.</p>","PeriodicalId":12059,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Public Health","volume":" ","pages":"666-675"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11293827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckae093","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Somatic and germline genetic alterations are significant drivers of cancer. Increasing integration of new technologies which profile these alterations requires timely, equitable and high-quality genetic counselling to facilitate accurate diagnoses and informed decision-making by patients and their families in preventive and clinical settings. This article aims to provide an overview of genetic counselling legislation and practice across European Union (EU) Member States to serve as a foundation for future European recommendations and action.

Methods: National legislative databases of all 27 Member States were searched using terms relevant to genetic counselling, translated as appropriate. Interviews with relevant experts from each Member State were conducted to validate legislative search results and provide detailed insights into genetic counselling practice in each country.

Results: Genetic counselling is included in national legislative documents of 22 of 27 Member States, with substantial variation in legal mechanisms and prescribed details (i.e. the 'who, what, when and where' of counselling). Practice is similarly varied. Workforce capacity (25 of 27 Member States) and genetic literacy (all Member States) were common reported barriers. Recognition and/or better integration of genetic counsellors and updated legislation and were most commonly noted as the 'most important change' which would improve practice.

Conclusions: This review highlights substantial variability in genetic counselling across EU Member States, as well as common barriers notwithstanding this variation. Future recommendations and action should focus on addressing literacy and capacity challenges through legislative, regulatory and/or strategic approaches at EU, national, regional and/or local levels.

欧盟成员国癌症遗传咨询的立法和实践。
背景:体细胞和种系遗传改变是癌症的重要诱因。越来越多的新技术整合了这些基因改变的特征,这就需要及时、公平和高质量的遗传咨询,以帮助患者及其家属在预防和临床环境中做出准确诊断和知情决策。本文旨在概述欧盟(EU)各成员国的遗传咨询立法和实践,为欧洲未来的建议和行动奠定基础:方法:使用与遗传咨询相关的术语搜索所有 27 个成员国的国家立法数据库,并酌情翻译。与各成员国的相关专家进行了访谈,以验证立法搜索结果,并详细了解各国的遗传咨询实践:在 27 个会员国中,有 22 个国家将遗传咨询纳入了国家立法文件,但在法律机制和规定细节(即咨询的 "谁、什么、何时和何地")方面存在很大差异。在实践中也同样存在差异。劳动力能力(27 个会员国中的 25 个)和遗传知识(所有会员国)是所报告的共同障碍。承认遗传咨询师和/或更好地整合遗传咨询师以及更新立法最常被视为可改善实践的 "最重要的改变":本综述强调了欧盟各成员国在遗传咨询方面存在的巨大差异,以及尽管存在差异但仍存在的共同障碍。未来的建议和行动应侧重于通过欧盟、国家、地区和/或地方层面的立法、监管和/或战略方法来应对扫盲和能力挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Journal of Public Health
European Journal of Public Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
2.30%
发文量
2039
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Public Health (EJPH) is a multidisciplinary journal aimed at attracting contributions from epidemiology, health services research, health economics, social sciences, management sciences, ethics and law, environmental health sciences, and other disciplines of relevance to public health. The journal provides a forum for discussion and debate of current international public health issues, with a focus on the European Region. Bi-monthly issues contain peer-reviewed original articles, editorials, commentaries, book reviews, news, letters to the editor, announcements of events, and various other features.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信