A Survey of Manual Therapy Techniques and Protocols Used to Prevent or Treat Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients During and after Radiation Therapy.

Global advances in integrative medicine and health Pub Date : 2024-06-18 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1177/27536130241263349
Kadesh Daniels, Anindita Chanda, Lucas Berry, Arpita Edke, Parth Patel, Andy Wun, Gintas P Krisciunas
{"title":"A Survey of Manual Therapy Techniques and Protocols Used to Prevent or Treat Dysphagia in Head and Neck Cancer Patients During and after Radiation Therapy.","authors":"Kadesh Daniels, Anindita Chanda, Lucas Berry, Arpita Edke, Parth Patel, Andy Wun, Gintas P Krisciunas","doi":"10.1177/27536130241263349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Authoritative research demonstrating efficacy of traditional dysphagia therapy for Head & Neck Cancer (HNC) patients is limited. A 2019 survey reported speech-language-pathologists (SLPs) have started using Manual Therapy (MT) to prevent or rehabilitate dysphagia in HNC patients. This application of MT is supported theoretically but no research has established efficacy. Further, specific contents of MT protocols employed in this setting remain unknown.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the absence of HNC dysphagia specific MT protocols, this study aimed to better understand MT protocols employed by SLPs to prevent and treat dysphagia in HNC patients during and after Radiation Therapy (RT).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An internet-based questionnaire for SLPs who use MT with HNC patients was developed and tested for face/content validity. It was sent to SLPs practicing in the USA, twice, through three national listservs (ASHA-SIG13, ASHA-SIG3, University of Iowa Voiceserv).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 64 respondents, 44 completed the survey. Of the 44, 15(34%) provided proactive MT during RT, 37(84%) provided proactive MT after RT (to prevent dysphagia), and 44(100%) provided reactive MT after RT (to treat dysphagia). 40(91%) were trained in MT through a CE course and 25(57%) had HNC-specific MT training. The most common MT techniques were laryngeal manipulation (LM) and myofascial release (MFR). During RT, MT protocols are gentler and highly tailored, with simple home programs of mild intensity. After RT, protocols are more regimented and aggressive, but still highly customized, with more diverse home programs of at least moderate intensity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MT for HNC patients lacks a standard protocol or approach, but MFR and LM, or components of those techniques, are used most frequently. Given the frequency with which MFR and LM are employed to treat dysphagia during and post-RT, and the lack of empirical evidence supporting or refuting their use, a collaboratively designed RCT is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of MT for HNC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":73159,"journal":{"name":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189010/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global advances in integrative medicine and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/27536130241263349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Authoritative research demonstrating efficacy of traditional dysphagia therapy for Head & Neck Cancer (HNC) patients is limited. A 2019 survey reported speech-language-pathologists (SLPs) have started using Manual Therapy (MT) to prevent or rehabilitate dysphagia in HNC patients. This application of MT is supported theoretically but no research has established efficacy. Further, specific contents of MT protocols employed in this setting remain unknown.

Objectives: In the absence of HNC dysphagia specific MT protocols, this study aimed to better understand MT protocols employed by SLPs to prevent and treat dysphagia in HNC patients during and after Radiation Therapy (RT).

Methods: An internet-based questionnaire for SLPs who use MT with HNC patients was developed and tested for face/content validity. It was sent to SLPs practicing in the USA, twice, through three national listservs (ASHA-SIG13, ASHA-SIG3, University of Iowa Voiceserv).

Results: Of 64 respondents, 44 completed the survey. Of the 44, 15(34%) provided proactive MT during RT, 37(84%) provided proactive MT after RT (to prevent dysphagia), and 44(100%) provided reactive MT after RT (to treat dysphagia). 40(91%) were trained in MT through a CE course and 25(57%) had HNC-specific MT training. The most common MT techniques were laryngeal manipulation (LM) and myofascial release (MFR). During RT, MT protocols are gentler and highly tailored, with simple home programs of mild intensity. After RT, protocols are more regimented and aggressive, but still highly customized, with more diverse home programs of at least moderate intensity.

Conclusion: MT for HNC patients lacks a standard protocol or approach, but MFR and LM, or components of those techniques, are used most frequently. Given the frequency with which MFR and LM are employed to treat dysphagia during and post-RT, and the lack of empirical evidence supporting or refuting their use, a collaboratively designed RCT is warranted to establish the safety and efficacy of MT for HNC patients.

用于预防或治疗头颈部癌症患者放疗期间和放疗后吞咽困难的手法治疗技术和方案调查。
背景:证明头颈癌(HNC)患者接受传统吞咽困难治疗疗效的权威研究十分有限。2019 年的一项调查报告显示,语言病理学家(SLP)已开始使用手动疗法(MT)来预防或康复 HNC 患者的吞咽困难。MT的应用得到了理论上的支持,但没有研究证实其疗效。此外,在这种情况下使用的 MT 方案的具体内容仍不清楚:在缺乏针对 HNC 吞咽困难的 MT 方案的情况下,本研究旨在更好地了解 SLP 在放射治疗(RT)期间和之后为预防和治疗 HNC 患者吞咽困难而采用的 MT 方案:方法: 针对对 HNC 患者使用 MT 的 SLP,开发了一份基于互联网的调查问卷,并进行了面效/内容效度测试。该问卷通过三个全国性列表服务器(ASHA-SIG13、ASHA-SIG3 和爱荷华大学 Voiceserv)两次发送给在美国执业的 SLPs:在 64 位受访者中,44 位完成了调查。在这 44 位受访者中,15 位(34%)在 RT 期间提供主动式 MT,37 位(84%)在 RT 后提供主动式 MT(预防吞咽困难),44 位(100%)在 RT 后提供反应式 MT(治疗吞咽困难)。有 40 人(91%)通过 CE 课程接受过 MT 培训,25 人(57%)接受过 HNC 专门的 MT 培训。最常见的 MT 技术是喉部操作 (LM) 和肌筋膜松解 (MFR)。在 RT 期间,MT 方案较为温和,具有高度针对性,是强度温和的简单家庭方案。RT 结束后,治疗方案更加规范和积极,但仍具有高度定制性,并提供至少中等强度的更多样化的家庭治疗方案:结论:HNC 患者的 MT 缺乏标准方案或方法,但 MFR 和 LM 或这些技术的组成部分最常用。鉴于 MFR 和 LM 被频繁用于治疗 RT 期间和 RT 后的吞咽困难,且缺乏支持或反驳其使用的实证证据,因此有必要合作设计一项 RCT,以确定 MT 对 HNC 患者的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信