Effects of Natural Delivery and Cesarean Section on the Result of First Hearing Screening of Newborns.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Noise & Health Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.4103/nah.nah_68_23
Hui Fu, Feng Wang
{"title":"Effects of Natural Delivery and Cesarean Section on the Result of First Hearing Screening of Newborns.","authors":"Hui Fu, Feng Wang","doi":"10.4103/nah.nah_68_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early detection and intervention of hearing issues in newborns are crucial for their auditory and speech development, necessitating newborn hearing screenings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of delivery methods, specifically natural delivery and cesarean section, on newborn hearing screening outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods and material: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 600 newborns delivered at The First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University between January 2020 and January 2023. The initial hearing screenings used the AccuScreen otoacoustic emission instrument. The study examined the influence of delivery method on the pass rates of newborns' first hearing screenings within and beyond 48 h postbirth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The pass rates for the initial hearing screenings, conducted within and after 48 h of birth, were significantly higher in the natural delivery group compared to the cesarean section group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified the delivery method as a significant factor influencing the pass rates of newborns' first hearing screenings.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The mode of delivery appears to affect the results of the initial hearing screenings of newborns, though further research is needed to validate these findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19195,"journal":{"name":"Noise & Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Noise & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nah.nah_68_23","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Early detection and intervention of hearing issues in newborns are crucial for their auditory and speech development, necessitating newborn hearing screenings. This study aimed to investigate the impact of delivery methods, specifically natural delivery and cesarean section, on newborn hearing screening outcomes.

Methods and material: A retrospective analysis was conducted on data from 600 newborns delivered at The First Affiliated Hospital of Shaoyang University between January 2020 and January 2023. The initial hearing screenings used the AccuScreen otoacoustic emission instrument. The study examined the influence of delivery method on the pass rates of newborns' first hearing screenings within and beyond 48 h postbirth.

Results: The pass rates for the initial hearing screenings, conducted within and after 48 h of birth, were significantly higher in the natural delivery group compared to the cesarean section group (P < 0.05). Furthermore, multivariate analysis identified the delivery method as a significant factor influencing the pass rates of newborns' first hearing screenings.

Conclusions: The mode of delivery appears to affect the results of the initial hearing screenings of newborns, though further research is needed to validate these findings.

自然分娩和剖腹产对新生儿首次听力筛查结果的影响
背景:早期发现和干预新生儿听力问题对其听觉和语言发育至关重要,因此有必要进行新生儿听力筛查。本研究旨在探讨分娩方式(特别是自然分娩和剖宫产)对新生儿听力筛查结果的影响:本研究对 2020 年 1 月至 2023 年 1 月期间在邵阳学院附属第一医院分娩的 600 名新生儿的数据进行了回顾性分析。初次听力筛查使用的是 AccuScreen 声发射仪。研究探讨了分娩方式对新生儿出生后 48 小时内和 48 小时后首次听力筛查合格率的影响:结果:与剖宫产组相比,自然分娩组新生儿在出生后 48 小时内和 48 小时后的首次听力筛查合格率明显更高(P < 0.05)。此外,多变量分析表明分娩方式是影响新生儿首次听力筛查合格率的重要因素:分娩方式似乎会影响新生儿首次听力筛查的结果,但还需要进一步的研究来验证这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Noise & Health
Noise & Health AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
14.30%
发文量
27
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Noise and Health is the only International Journal devoted to research on all aspects of noise and its effects on human health. An inter-disciplinary journal for all professions concerned with auditory and non-auditory effects of occupational, environmental, and leisure noise. It aims to provide a forum for presentation of novel research material on a broad range of topics associated with noise pollution, its control and its detrimental effects on hearing and health. It will cover issues from basic experimental science through clinical evaluation and management, technical aspects of noise reduction systems and solutions to environmental issues relating to social and public health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信