Pull-Out Strength of Orthodontic Miniscrews in the Temporal Bone.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q1 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Christian Menke, Marcel Kluge, Bastian Welke, Thomas Lenarz, Omid Majdani, Thomas S Rau
{"title":"Pull-Out Strength of Orthodontic Miniscrews in the Temporal Bone.","authors":"Christian Menke, Marcel Kluge, Bastian Welke, Thomas Lenarz, Omid Majdani, Thomas S Rau","doi":"10.1177/19160216241248669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery by using a microstereotactic frame demands solid connection to the bone. We aimed to determine the stability of commercially available orthodontic miniscrews to evaluate their feasibility for frame's fixation. In addition, which substitute material most closely resembles the mechanical properties of the human temporal bone was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pull-out tests were carried out with five different types of orthodontic miniscrews in human temporal bone specimens. Furthermore, short fiber filled epoxy (SFFE), solid rigid polyurethane (SRPU50), bovine femur, and porcine iliac bone were evaluated as substitute materials. In total, 57 tests in human specimens and 180 tests in the substitute materials were performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In human temporal bone, average pull-out forces ranged from 220 N to 285 N between screws. Joint stiffness in human temporal bone ranged between 14 N/mm and 358 N/mm. Statistically significant differences between the tested screws were measured in terms of stiffness and elastic energy. One screw type failed insertion due to tip breakage. No significant differences occurred between screws in maximum pull-out force. The average pull-out values of SFFE were 14.1 N higher compared to human specimen.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Orthodontic miniscrews provided rigid fixation when partially inserted in human temporal bone, as evidenced by pull-out forces and joint stiffness. Average values exceeded requirements despite variations between screws. Differences in stiffness and elastic energy indicate screw-specific interface mechanics. With proper insertion, orthodontic miniscrews appear suitable for microstereotactic frame anchoring during minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery. However, testing under more complex loading is needed to better predict clinical performance. For further pull-out tests, the most suitable substitute material is SFFE.</p>","PeriodicalId":16615,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11191615/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Otolaryngology - Head & Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19160216241248669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery by using a microstereotactic frame demands solid connection to the bone. We aimed to determine the stability of commercially available orthodontic miniscrews to evaluate their feasibility for frame's fixation. In addition, which substitute material most closely resembles the mechanical properties of the human temporal bone was evaluated.

Methods: Pull-out tests were carried out with five different types of orthodontic miniscrews in human temporal bone specimens. Furthermore, short fiber filled epoxy (SFFE), solid rigid polyurethane (SRPU50), bovine femur, and porcine iliac bone were evaluated as substitute materials. In total, 57 tests in human specimens and 180 tests in the substitute materials were performed.

Results: In human temporal bone, average pull-out forces ranged from 220 N to 285 N between screws. Joint stiffness in human temporal bone ranged between 14 N/mm and 358 N/mm. Statistically significant differences between the tested screws were measured in terms of stiffness and elastic energy. One screw type failed insertion due to tip breakage. No significant differences occurred between screws in maximum pull-out force. The average pull-out values of SFFE were 14.1 N higher compared to human specimen.

Conclusion: Orthodontic miniscrews provided rigid fixation when partially inserted in human temporal bone, as evidenced by pull-out forces and joint stiffness. Average values exceeded requirements despite variations between screws. Differences in stiffness and elastic energy indicate screw-specific interface mechanics. With proper insertion, orthodontic miniscrews appear suitable for microstereotactic frame anchoring during minimally invasive cochlear implant surgery. However, testing under more complex loading is needed to better predict clinical performance. For further pull-out tests, the most suitable substitute material is SFFE.

正畸微型螺钉在颞骨中的拔出强度
背景:使用微型立体定向框架进行微创人工耳蜗植入手术需要与骨骼牢固连接。我们的目的是确定市售正畸微型螺钉的稳定性,以评估其用于框架固定的可行性。此外,我们还评估了哪种替代材料最接近人类颞骨的机械特性:方法:使用五种不同类型的正畸微型螺钉在人体颞骨标本中进行了拉出试验。此外,还对短纤维填充环氧树脂(SFFE)、固体硬质聚氨酯(SRPU50)、牛股骨和猪髂骨作为替代材料进行了评估。总共对人体标本进行了 57 次测试,对替代材料进行了 180 次测试:结果:在人类颞骨中,螺钉之间的平均拉出力介于 220 N 到 285 N 之间。人体颞骨的关节硬度介于 14 牛顿/毫米和 358 牛顿/毫米之间。在刚度和弹性能量方面,测试的螺钉之间存在明显的统计学差异。有一种螺钉因尖端断裂而无法插入。不同螺钉在最大拔出力方面没有明显差异。与人体试样相比,SFFE 的平均拔出力值高出 14.1 N:正畸微型螺钉部分插入人体颞骨时可提供刚性固定,这一点可从拔出力和关节硬度得到证明。尽管螺钉之间存在差异,但平均值都超过了要求。刚度和弹性能量的差异表明螺钉特定的界面力学。在正确插入的情况下,正畸微型螺钉似乎适合在微创耳蜗植入手术中用于微型立体定向框架锚定。然而,要更好地预测临床表现,还需要在更复杂的加载条件下进行测试。对于进一步的拉出测试,最合适的替代材料是 SFFE。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing on all aspects and sub-specialties of otolaryngology-head & neck surgery, including pediatric and geriatric otolaryngology, rhinology & anterior skull base surgery, otology/neurotology, facial plastic & reconstructive surgery, head & neck oncology, and maxillofacial rehabilitation, as well as a broad range of related topics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信