What is the role of plastic surgery for incisional closures in pediatric spine surgery? Results from a pediatric spine study group survey.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Natalie L Zusman, Jacquelyn N Valenzuela-Moss, Tishya A L Wren, Tyler A Tetreault, Kenneth D Illingworth, Jaysson T Brooks, David L Skaggs, Lindsay M Andras, Michael J Heffernan
{"title":"What is the role of plastic surgery for incisional closures in pediatric spine surgery? Results from a pediatric spine study group survey.","authors":"Natalie L Zusman, Jacquelyn N Valenzuela-Moss, Tishya A L Wren, Tyler A Tetreault, Kenneth D Illingworth, Jaysson T Brooks, David L Skaggs, Lindsay M Andras, Michael J Heffernan","doi":"10.1097/BPB.0000000000001195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Current best practice guidelines recommend a plastics-style multilayer wound closure for high-risk pediatric spine surgery. However, plastic surgery closure of spinal incisions remains controversial. This study investigates surgeon perceptions and practice patterns regarding plastic surgery multilayered closure (PMC) in pediatric spine surgery. All surgeons in an international pediatric spine study group received a 30-question survey assessing incisional closure practices, frequency of plastic surgery collaboration, and drain management. Relationship to practice size, setting, geographic region, and individual diagnoses were analyzed. 87/178 (49%) surgeons responded from 79% of participating sites. Plastics utilization rates differed by diagnosis: neuromuscular scoliosis 16.9%, early onset scoliosis 7.8%, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 2.8% ( P  < 0.0001). Plastics were used more for early onset scoliosis [odds ratio (OR) 18.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.5, 40.2; P  < 0.001] and neuromuscular scoliosis [OR 29.2 (12.2, 69.9); P  < 0.001] than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Plastics use was unrelated to practice size, setting, or geographic region ( P  ≥ 0.09). Respondents used plastics more often for spina bifida and underweight patients compared to all other indications ( P  < 0.001). Compared to orthopaedic management, drains were utilized more often by plastic surgery (85 vs. 21%, P  = 0.06) and for longer durations ( P  = 0.001). Eighty-nine percent of surgeons felt plastics increased operative time (58 ± 37 min), and 34% felt it increased length of hospitalization. Surgeons who routinely utilize plastics were more likely to believe PMC decreases wound complications ( P  = 0.007). The perceived benefit of plastic surgery varies, highlighting equipoise among pediatric spine surgeons. An evidence-based guideline is needed to optimize utilization of plastics in pediatric spine surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":50092,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","volume":" ","pages":"83-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Orthopaedics-Part B","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0000000000001195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Current best practice guidelines recommend a plastics-style multilayer wound closure for high-risk pediatric spine surgery. However, plastic surgery closure of spinal incisions remains controversial. This study investigates surgeon perceptions and practice patterns regarding plastic surgery multilayered closure (PMC) in pediatric spine surgery. All surgeons in an international pediatric spine study group received a 30-question survey assessing incisional closure practices, frequency of plastic surgery collaboration, and drain management. Relationship to practice size, setting, geographic region, and individual diagnoses were analyzed. 87/178 (49%) surgeons responded from 79% of participating sites. Plastics utilization rates differed by diagnosis: neuromuscular scoliosis 16.9%, early onset scoliosis 7.8%, adolescent idiopathic scoliosis 2.8% ( P  < 0.0001). Plastics were used more for early onset scoliosis [odds ratio (OR) 18.5, 95% confidence interval (CI): 8.5, 40.2; P  < 0.001] and neuromuscular scoliosis [OR 29.2 (12.2, 69.9); P  < 0.001] than adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Plastics use was unrelated to practice size, setting, or geographic region ( P  ≥ 0.09). Respondents used plastics more often for spina bifida and underweight patients compared to all other indications ( P  < 0.001). Compared to orthopaedic management, drains were utilized more often by plastic surgery (85 vs. 21%, P  = 0.06) and for longer durations ( P  = 0.001). Eighty-nine percent of surgeons felt plastics increased operative time (58 ± 37 min), and 34% felt it increased length of hospitalization. Surgeons who routinely utilize plastics were more likely to believe PMC decreases wound complications ( P  = 0.007). The perceived benefit of plastic surgery varies, highlighting equipoise among pediatric spine surgeons. An evidence-based guideline is needed to optimize utilization of plastics in pediatric spine surgery.

整形外科在小儿脊柱手术切口缝合中的作用是什么?小儿脊柱研究小组的调查结果。
目前的最佳实践指南建议对高风险的小儿脊柱手术进行整形式多层伤口闭合。然而,整形外科对脊柱切口的闭合仍存在争议。本研究调查了外科医生对小儿脊柱手术中整形外科多层伤口闭合(PMC)的看法和实践模式。一个国际小儿脊柱研究小组中的所有外科医生都收到了一份包含 30 个问题的调查问卷,调查内容包括切口闭合方法、整形外科合作频率以及引流管管理。调查分析了与诊所规模、环境、地理区域和个人诊断的关系。79%的参与研究机构的87/178(49%)名外科医生做出了回复。整形手术的使用率因诊断而异:神经肌肉性脊柱侧凸占 16.9%,早发脊柱侧凸占 7.8%,青少年特发性脊柱侧凸占 2.8%(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
170
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal highlights important recent developments from the world''s leading clinical and research institutions. The journal publishes peer-reviewed papers on the diagnosis and treatment of pediatric orthopedic disorders. It is the official journal of IFPOS (International Federation of Paediatric Orthopaedic Societies). Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信