The initial experience of robot-assisted transabdominal transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair for small ventral hernia

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Gen Shimada, Taketo Matsubara, Marc Weijie Ong, Mariko Sambommatsu, Shintaro Sakurai
{"title":"The initial experience of robot-assisted transabdominal transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair for small ventral hernia","authors":"Gen Shimada,&nbsp;Taketo Matsubara,&nbsp;Marc Weijie Ong,&nbsp;Mariko Sambommatsu,&nbsp;Shintaro Sakurai","doi":"10.1111/ases.13337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Despite the widespread of ventral hernia repairs globally, the approach method, dissection planes, defect closure, and the choice and placement layer of mesh are an ongoing debate. We reported the details of surgical techniques, safety and feasibility for robot-assisted transabdominal transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair (R-TATFPP) for small ventral hernia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study included 5 cases of R-TATFPP repair among 22 cases performed by robot-assisted ventral hernia repair from 2018 to 2023 with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at St. Luke's International University and clinical ethical committee at St. Luke's International Hospital (19-R147, 22–012).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were four males and one female, with mean age of 64.4 ± 10.0 years, inclusive of two umbilical and three incisional hernias. Mean height, weight, body mass index (BMI), hernia defect length, width, operation time, console time, and hospital stay were 171.2 ± 11.8 cm, 82.4 ± 13.4 kg, 28.0 ± 2.1 kg/m<sup>2</sup>, 2.8 ± 1.4 cm, 3.0 ± 1.3 cm, 180 min, 133.8 min, and 2.4 days, respectively. No conversion nor complication was observed except for one acute urinary retention.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Robot-assisted transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair was safe and feasible for small ventral hernia with the minimal disruption to the abdominal wall architecture and structures.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.13337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Despite the widespread of ventral hernia repairs globally, the approach method, dissection planes, defect closure, and the choice and placement layer of mesh are an ongoing debate. We reported the details of surgical techniques, safety and feasibility for robot-assisted transabdominal transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair (R-TATFPP) for small ventral hernia.

Methods

This study included 5 cases of R-TATFPP repair among 22 cases performed by robot-assisted ventral hernia repair from 2018 to 2023 with the approval of the Institutional Review Board at St. Luke's International University and clinical ethical committee at St. Luke's International Hospital (19-R147, 22–012).

Results

There were four males and one female, with mean age of 64.4 ± 10.0 years, inclusive of two umbilical and three incisional hernias. Mean height, weight, body mass index (BMI), hernia defect length, width, operation time, console time, and hospital stay were 171.2 ± 11.8 cm, 82.4 ± 13.4 kg, 28.0 ± 2.1 kg/m2, 2.8 ± 1.4 cm, 3.0 ± 1.3 cm, 180 min, 133.8 min, and 2.4 days, respectively. No conversion nor complication was observed except for one acute urinary retention.

Conclusion

Robot-assisted transversalis fascial and preperitoneal repair was safe and feasible for small ventral hernia with the minimal disruption to the abdominal wall architecture and structures.

机器人辅助经腹横筋膜和腹膜前修补术治疗小腹股沟疝的初步经验。
目的:尽管腹股沟疝修补术在全球范围内广泛开展,但其入路方法、解剖平面、缺损闭合以及网片的选择和放置层一直存在争议。我们报告了机器人辅助经腹横筋膜和腹膜前修补术(R-TATFPP)治疗小腹股沟疝的手术技巧、安全性和可行性:本研究纳入2018年至2023年22例机器人辅助腹股沟疝修补术中的5例R-TATFPP修补术,经圣路加国际大学机构审查委员会和圣路加国际医院临床伦理委员会批准(19-R147,22-012):四男一女,平均年龄(64.4±10.0)岁,其中包括两个脐疝和三个切口疝。平均身高、体重、体重指数(BMI)、疝缺损长度、宽度、手术时间、控制台时间和住院时间分别为(171.2 ± 11.8)厘米、(82.4 ± 13.4)公斤、(28.0 ± 2.1)公斤/平方米、(2.8 ± 1.4)厘米、(3.0 ± 1.3)厘米、180 分钟、133.8 分钟和 2.4 天。除一次急性尿潴留外,未发现其他转归或并发症:结论:机器人辅助横筋膜和腹膜前修补术对腹壁结构和构造的破坏最小,对小腹股沟疝是安全可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信