Analysis of the Effect of Superselective Ophthalmic Artery Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Ophthalmic Research Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1159/000539362
Ningyu Kang, Yan Xue, Fei Wang, Qingliang Guan, Min Li
{"title":"Analysis of the Effect of Superselective Ophthalmic Artery Thrombolysis for Central Retinal Artery Occlusion.","authors":"Ningyu Kang, Yan Xue, Fei Wang, Qingliang Guan, Min Li","doi":"10.1159/000539362","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective study of CRAO patients who attended the Department of Ophthalmology of Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023, 138 CRAO patients with onset time of 1-3 days were selected for the study. Among them, 86 patients refused thrombolytic treatment and chose to adopt traditional treatment, which was categorized as the control group; 52 patients adopted superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolytic treatment, which was categorized as the observation group. The visual acuity of the patients treated with traditional modality on the 4th day after the onset of the disease and the visual acuity of the patients treated with superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis on the 1st postoperative day were recorded, and the visual acuity improvement after different modalities of treatment was compared between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the control group, 77 (89.5%) of the treated patients had no improvement in visual acuity, 9 (10.5%) had improvement, 0 (0.0%) had significant improvement, and the total improvement was 9 (10.5%); in the observation group, 18 (34.6%) of the treated patients had no improvement in visual acuity, 21 (40.4%) had improvement, 13 (25.0%) had significant improvement, and the total improvement was 34 (65.4%). The total improvement rate of treatment in the observation group was 65.4%, which was significantly higher than the 10.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p &lt; 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis for patients with CRAO is clinically effective, promotes improvement in patient vision, and has a high safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":19662,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic Research","volume":" ","pages":"387-392"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539362","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The aim of the study was to investigate the clinical efficacy of superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis for central retinal artery occlusion (CRAO).

Methods: Retrospective study of CRAO patients who attended the Department of Ophthalmology of Affiliated Hospital of Weifang Medical University from January 2022 to July 2023, 138 CRAO patients with onset time of 1-3 days were selected for the study. Among them, 86 patients refused thrombolytic treatment and chose to adopt traditional treatment, which was categorized as the control group; 52 patients adopted superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolytic treatment, which was categorized as the observation group. The visual acuity of the patients treated with traditional modality on the 4th day after the onset of the disease and the visual acuity of the patients treated with superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis on the 1st postoperative day were recorded, and the visual acuity improvement after different modalities of treatment was compared between the two groups.

Results: In the control group, 77 (89.5%) of the treated patients had no improvement in visual acuity, 9 (10.5%) had improvement, 0 (0.0%) had significant improvement, and the total improvement was 9 (10.5%); in the observation group, 18 (34.6%) of the treated patients had no improvement in visual acuity, 21 (40.4%) had improvement, 13 (25.0%) had significant improvement, and the total improvement was 34 (65.4%). The total improvement rate of treatment in the observation group was 65.4%, which was significantly higher than the 10.5% in the control group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: Superselective ophthalmic artery thrombolysis for patients with CRAO is clinically effective, promotes improvement in patient vision, and has a high safety profile.

超选择性眼动脉溶栓治疗视网膜中央动脉闭塞的效果分析。
摘要] 目的 探讨超选择性眼动脉溶栓治疗视网膜中央动脉闭塞(CRAO)的临床疗效。方法 对 2022 年 1 月至 2023 年 7 月在潍坊医学院附属医院眼科就诊的 CRAO 患者进行回顾性研究,选择 138 例发病时间为 1-3 天的 CRAO 患者作为研究对象。其中,86例患者拒绝溶栓治疗,选择采用传统治疗方法,列为对照组;52例患者采用超选择性眼动脉溶栓治疗方法,列为观察组。记录采用传统方式治疗的患者发病后第 4 天的视力和采用超选择性眼动脉溶栓治疗的患者术后第 1 天的视力,比较两组患者不同治疗方式后视力的改善情况。结果 对照组中,77 例(89.5%)治疗后视力无改善,9 例(10.5%)改善,0 例(0.0%)明显改善,总改善率为 9(10.5%);观察组中,18 例(34.6%)治疗后视力无改善,21 例(40.4%)改善,13 例(25.0%)明显改善,总改善率为 34(65.4%)。观察组治疗总改善率为 65.4%,明显高于对照组的 10.5%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论 对 CRAO 患者进行超选择性眼动脉溶栓治疗临床效果好,能促进患者视力改善,安全性高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ophthalmic Research
Ophthalmic Research 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.80%
发文量
75
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ''Ophthalmic Research'' features original papers and reviews reporting on translational and clinical studies. Authors from throughout the world cover research topics on every field in connection with physical, physiologic, pharmacological, biochemical and molecular biological aspects of ophthalmology. This journal also aims to provide a record of international clinical research for both researchers and clinicians in ophthalmology. Finally, the transfer of information from fundamental research to clinical research and clinical practice is particularly welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信