Controversies in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided management of walled-off necrosis.

Yousuke Nakai, Tomotaka Saito, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Tatsuya Sato, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Naminatsu Takahara, Hiroyuki Isayama, Ichiro Yasuda, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro
{"title":"Controversies in endoscopic ultrasonography-guided management of walled-off necrosis.","authors":"Yousuke Nakai, Tomotaka Saito, Tsuyoshi Hamada, Tatsuya Sato, Ryunosuke Hakuta, Naminatsu Takahara, Hiroyuki Isayama, Ichiro Yasuda, Mitsuhiro Fujishiro","doi":"10.1111/den.14869","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Walled-off necrosis (WON) develops as local complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Although less invasive interventions such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy are selected over surgical interventions, delayed and step-up interventions are still preferred to avoid procedure-related adverse events. However, there is a controversy about the appropriate timing of drainage and subsequent necrosectomy. The advent of large-caliber lumen-apposing metal stents has also brought about potential advantages of proactive interventions, which still needs investigation in future trials. When step-up interventions of necrosectomy and additional drainage are necessary, a structured or protocoled approach for WON has been reported to improve safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment, but has not been standardized yet. Finally, long-term outcomes such as recurrence of WON, pancreatic endocrine, and exocrine function are increasingly investigated in association with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. In this review we discuss current evidence and controversy on EUS-guided management of WON.</p>","PeriodicalId":72813,"journal":{"name":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive endoscopy : official journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/den.14869","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Walled-off necrosis (WON) develops as local complications after acute necrotizing pancreatitis. Although less invasive interventions such as endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided drainage and endoscopic necrosectomy are selected over surgical interventions, delayed and step-up interventions are still preferred to avoid procedure-related adverse events. However, there is a controversy about the appropriate timing of drainage and subsequent necrosectomy. The advent of large-caliber lumen-apposing metal stents has also brought about potential advantages of proactive interventions, which still needs investigation in future trials. When step-up interventions of necrosectomy and additional drainage are necessary, a structured or protocoled approach for WON has been reported to improve safety and effectiveness of endoscopic and/or percutaneous treatment, but has not been standardized yet. Finally, long-term outcomes such as recurrence of WON, pancreatic endocrine, and exocrine function are increasingly investigated in association with disconnected pancreatic duct syndrome. In this review we discuss current evidence and controversy on EUS-guided management of WON.

内窥镜超声波引导下的贴壁坏死治疗存在争议。
急性坏死性胰腺炎术后会出现局部并发症--脱壁坏死(WON)。虽然内镜超声(EUS)引导引流和内镜坏死切除术等侵入性较小的干预措施比手术干预措施更受青睐,但为了避免与手术相关的不良事件,延迟干预和分步干预仍是首选。然而,对于引流和随后的坏死切除术的适当时机还存在争议。大口径管腔贴合金属支架的出现也为主动干预带来了潜在的优势,这仍需要在未来的试验中进行研究。当需要进行坏死切除术和额外引流术的升级干预时,有报道称针对 WON 的结构化或协议化方法可提高内镜和/或经皮治疗的安全性和有效性,但目前尚未标准化。最后,与胰管未闭综合征相关的长期结果,如胰管未闭的复发、胰腺内分泌和外分泌功能的研究也越来越多。在这篇综述中,我们将讨论 EUS 引导下处理 WON 的现有证据和争议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信