Comprehensive clinical and histological evaluation of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft with polypropylene membrane versus leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction.

IF 1.1 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Minerva dental and oral science Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05016-2
Karine C Lima, Maria E Bizzoca, Michele Covelli, Anderson C DE Oliveira, Fabiano C Zanardo, Ricardo R Vecchiatti, Jocelino L Soares, Nunzio Cirulli, Stefania Cantore, Fábio F Silva
{"title":"Comprehensive clinical and histological evaluation of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft with polypropylene membrane versus leukocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction.","authors":"Karine C Lima, Maria E Bizzoca, Michele Covelli, Anderson C DE Oliveira, Fabiano C Zanardo, Ricardo R Vecchiatti, Jocelino L Soares, Nunzio Cirulli, Stefania Cantore, Fábio F Silva","doi":"10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05016-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Osseointegrated implant placement in the ideal prosthetic position necessitates a sufficient residual alveolar ridge. Tooth extraction and the subsequent healing process often lead to bony deformities, characterized by a reduction in alveolar ridge height and width, resulting in unfavorable ridge architecture for dental implant placement. Several materials, including allografts, alloplastics, xenografts, and autogenous bone, are commonly used to address these concerns. In this context, leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) emerges as a promising solution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This case report aims to compare the clinical and histological efficacy of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft covered with polypropylene membrane (BHAG-PM) and leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in preserving dental alveoli following tooth extraction. Extraction, graft placement in the alveoli, and the anterior border between extracted elements were performed for both treatment groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Up to 24 months of follow-up revealed satisfactory and comparable clinical and histological outcomes. These results suggest that both BHAG-PM and L-PRF effectively promote alveolar preservation, paving the way for ideal implant placement.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In general, bone-substitute materials are effective in reducing alveolar changes after tooth extraction. Xenograft materials should be considered as among the best of the available grafting materials for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction. Both techniques effectively preserve the alveolar bone and facilitate the placement of osseointegrated implants in ideal positions, paving the way for successful oral rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":18709,"journal":{"name":"Minerva dental and oral science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva dental and oral science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6329.24.05016-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Osseointegrated implant placement in the ideal prosthetic position necessitates a sufficient residual alveolar ridge. Tooth extraction and the subsequent healing process often lead to bony deformities, characterized by a reduction in alveolar ridge height and width, resulting in unfavorable ridge architecture for dental implant placement. Several materials, including allografts, alloplastics, xenografts, and autogenous bone, are commonly used to address these concerns. In this context, leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) emerges as a promising solution.

Methods: This case report aims to compare the clinical and histological efficacy of bovine hydroxyapatite bone graft covered with polypropylene membrane (BHAG-PM) and leucocyte- and platelet-rich fibrin (L-PRF) in preserving dental alveoli following tooth extraction. Extraction, graft placement in the alveoli, and the anterior border between extracted elements were performed for both treatment groups.

Results: Up to 24 months of follow-up revealed satisfactory and comparable clinical and histological outcomes. These results suggest that both BHAG-PM and L-PRF effectively promote alveolar preservation, paving the way for ideal implant placement.

Conclusions: In general, bone-substitute materials are effective in reducing alveolar changes after tooth extraction. Xenograft materials should be considered as among the best of the available grafting materials for alveolar preservation after tooth extraction. Both techniques effectively preserve the alveolar bone and facilitate the placement of osseointegrated implants in ideal positions, paving the way for successful oral rehabilitation.

聚丙烯膜牛羟基磷灰石骨移植与富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白在拔牙后牙槽骨保存方面的临床和组织学综合评估。
背景:将骨结合种植体植入理想的修复位置需要有足够的残留牙槽嵴。拔牙和随后的愈合过程通常会导致骨性畸形,其特征是牙槽嵴高度和宽度的减少,从而导致不利于种植体植入的牙槽嵴结构。为了解决这些问题,通常会使用多种材料,包括同种异体移植、异种塑料、异种移植和自体骨。在这种情况下,富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白(L-PRF)成为一种很有前景的解决方案:本病例报告旨在比较聚丙烯膜覆盖的牛羟基磷灰石骨移植(BHAG-PM)和富含白细胞和血小板的纤维蛋白(L-PRF)在拔牙后保留牙槽骨的临床和组织学疗效。两组治疗者均进行了拔牙,并在牙泡和拔出牙之间的前缘进行了移植:结果:长达 24 个月的随访显示,临床和组织学结果令人满意且具有可比性。这些结果表明,BHAG-PM 和 L-PRF 都能有效促进牙槽骨的保存,为理想的种植体植入铺平道路:总的来说,骨替代材料能有效减少拔牙后牙槽骨的变化。异种材料应被视为拔牙后牙槽骨保存的最佳移植材料之一。这两种技术都能有效保存牙槽骨,并有助于在理想位置植入骨结合种植体,为成功的口腔康复铺平道路。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva dental and oral science
Minerva dental and oral science DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
5.00%
发文量
61
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信