Total joint arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Rasmus Liukkonen, Venla-Linnea Karjalainen, Reetta Kvist, Matias Vaajala, Ville Ponkilainen, Teemu Karjalainen
{"title":"Total joint arthroplasty for thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Rasmus Liukkonen, Venla-Linnea Karjalainen, Reetta Kvist, Matias Vaajala, Ville Ponkilainen, Teemu Karjalainen","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2024.40816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly treated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms of the TJA for thumb CMC OA compared with other treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases on August 2, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of TJA in people with thumb CMC joint OA regardless of the stage or etiology of the disease or comparator. The outcomes were pooled with a random effect meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 4 studies randomizing 420 participants to TJA or trapeziectomy. At 3 months, TJA's benefits for pain may exceed the clinically important difference. However, after 1-year follow-up TJA does not improve pain compared with trapeziectomy (mean difference 0.53 points on a 0 to 10 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.81). Furthermore, it provides a transient benefit in hand function at 3 months (measured with Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, scale 0-100, lower is better) compared with trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. The benefit in function diminished to a clinically unimportant level at 1-year follow-up (4.4 points better; CI 0.42-8.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transient benefit in hand function for TJA implies that it could be a preferable option over trapeziectomy for people who consider fast postoperative recovery important. However, current evidence fails to inform us if TJA carries long-term higher risks of revisions compared with trapeziectomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"95 ","pages":"325-332"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11184324/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2024.40816","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: Thumb carpometacarpal (CMC) joint osteoarthritis (OA) is increasingly treated with total joint arthroplasty (TJA). We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the benefits and harms of the TJA for thumb CMC OA compared with other treatment strategies.

Patients and methods: We performed a systematic search on MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases on August 2, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials investigating the effect of TJA in people with thumb CMC joint OA regardless of the stage or etiology of the disease or comparator. The outcomes were pooled with a random effect meta-analysis.

Results: We identified 4 studies randomizing 420 participants to TJA or trapeziectomy. At 3 months, TJA's benefits for pain may exceed the clinically important difference. However, after 1-year follow-up TJA does not improve pain compared with trapeziectomy (mean difference 0.53 points on a 0 to 10 scale; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.26-0.81). Furthermore, it provides a transient benefit in hand function at 3 months (measured with Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire, scale 0-100, lower is better) compared with trapeziectomy with or without ligament reconstruction tendon interposition. The benefit in function diminished to a clinically unimportant level at 1-year follow-up (4.4 points better; CI 0.42-8.4).

Conclusion: Transient benefit in hand function for TJA implies that it could be a preferable option over trapeziectomy for people who consider fast postoperative recovery important. However, current evidence fails to inform us if TJA carries long-term higher risks of revisions compared with trapeziectomy.

治疗拇指腕掌关节骨关节炎的全关节成形术:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:越来越多的拇指腕掌(CMC)关节骨关节炎(OA)患者接受全关节成形术(TJA)治疗。我们旨在对拇指腕掌关节骨性关节炎(CMC OA)的全关节成形术与其他治疗策略的利弊进行系统回顾和荟萃分析:我们于 2023 年 8 月 2 日在 MEDLINE 和 CENTRAL 数据库中进行了系统检索。我们纳入了调查拇指 CMC 关节 OA 患者 TJA 效果的随机对照试验,而不考虑疾病的阶段、病因或比较者。通过随机效应荟萃分析对结果进行了汇总:我们确定了 4 项研究,将 420 名参与者随机分为 TJA 或梯形切除术。3 个月时,TJA 对疼痛的益处可能超过临床重要差异。然而,随访 1 年后,TJA 与梯形切除术相比并不能改善疼痛(0 至 10 分的平均差异为 0.53 分;95% 置信区间 [CI] 为 0.26-0.81)。此外,与伴有或不伴有韧带重建肌腱内插的梯形切除术相比,3 个月后的手部功能(通过 "手臂、肩部和手部残疾 "调查问卷测量,0-100 分,越低越好)可获得短暂的改善。随访1年后,对功能的益处降至临床上不重要的水平(好4.4分;CI 0.42-8.4):结论:TJA术后手部功能的短暂获益意味着,对于那些认为术后快速恢复很重要的人来说,TJA可能是比斜方肌切除术更可取的选择。结论:TJA术后手部功能的短暂获益意味着,对于那些认为术后快速恢复很重要的人来说,TJA可能比肩梯形切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Orthopaedica
Acta Orthopaedica 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
105
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信