A preliminary study of collaborative group intervention with recovered peer supporters for eating disorders: Analyses including comparisons between in‐person and online sessions

Yosuke Mochizuki, Tomoyo Isobe, Yuna Endo, Aina Iio, Kiyokazu Takebayashi, H. Yamasue
{"title":"A preliminary study of collaborative group intervention with recovered peer supporters for eating disorders: Analyses including comparisons between in‐person and online sessions","authors":"Yosuke Mochizuki, Tomoyo Isobe, Yuna Endo, Aina Iio, Kiyokazu Takebayashi, H. Yamasue","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of a single‐session group intervention for individuals with an eating disorder that involved collaborations between peer supporters, who had recovered from an eating disorder, and psychological professionals. We also compared intervention effects between in‐person and online settings.Participants with an eating disorder were recruited through online platforms and public promotional materials. The inclusion criteria involved individuals who had current eating disorders and were willing to openly share their experiences during the session in which the Reflecting Team method was applied.The analysis included 103 participants (75 in‐person and 28 online). We found significant time‐based effects (F(1, 101) = 70.390, p < 0.001, ηG2 = 0.083), which indicated that participants experienced reductions in feelings of isolation, hopelessness associated with their eating disorder, and belief in the incurability of their disorder following the group interventions. No significant differences were observed between in‐person or remote sessions (F(1, 101) = 0.087, p = 0.768, ηG2 = 0.001).Our findings suggest that peer supporters serve as a source of hope for individuals with eating disorders, even within group settings. Furthermore, the similar outcomes across in‐person and online sessions show the promise of remote group sessions as a novel means of support for individuals with eating disorders, regardless of their geographical location. However, future randomized controlled trials of continuous group therapy sessions are essential to confirm their effectiveness.","PeriodicalId":507124,"journal":{"name":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports","volume":"28 S1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impacts of a single‐session group intervention for individuals with an eating disorder that involved collaborations between peer supporters, who had recovered from an eating disorder, and psychological professionals. We also compared intervention effects between in‐person and online settings.Participants with an eating disorder were recruited through online platforms and public promotional materials. The inclusion criteria involved individuals who had current eating disorders and were willing to openly share their experiences during the session in which the Reflecting Team method was applied.The analysis included 103 participants (75 in‐person and 28 online). We found significant time‐based effects (F(1, 101) = 70.390, p < 0.001, ηG2 = 0.083), which indicated that participants experienced reductions in feelings of isolation, hopelessness associated with their eating disorder, and belief in the incurability of their disorder following the group interventions. No significant differences were observed between in‐person or remote sessions (F(1, 101) = 0.087, p = 0.768, ηG2 = 0.001).Our findings suggest that peer supporters serve as a source of hope for individuals with eating disorders, even within group settings. Furthermore, the similar outcomes across in‐person and online sessions show the promise of remote group sessions as a novel means of support for individuals with eating disorders, regardless of their geographical location. However, future randomized controlled trials of continuous group therapy sessions are essential to confirm their effectiveness.
与饮食失调康复者同伴支持者合作进行小组干预的初步研究:分析包括现场和在线课程之间的比较
本研究旨在评估针对饮食失调症患者的单节课小组干预措施的影响,该干预措施涉及饮食失调症康复者的同伴支持者与心理专业人士之间的合作。我们还比较了现场和网络环境下的干预效果。我们通过网络平台和公共宣传材料招募了饮食失调参与者。纳入标准包括目前患有饮食失调,并愿意在采用反思小组法的会议上公开分享自己的经历。我们发现了明显的时间效应(F(1, 101) = 70.390, p < 0.001, ηG2 = 0.083),这表明参与者在接受小组干预后,孤独感、与饮食失调相关的绝望感以及对饮食失调不可治愈的信念都有所减轻。我们的研究结果表明,同伴支持者是进食障碍患者的希望之源,即使是在小组环境中也是如此。此外,面对面和在线会议的相似结果表明,远程小组会议是为饮食失调症患者提供支持的一种新方法,无论他们身处何地。不过,未来对连续性小组治疗课程进行随机对照试验对确认其有效性至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信