In search of consent: Agency, audience and identity in memory activism

IF 1.4 2区 心理学 Q1 CULTURAL STUDIES
Radhika Hettiarachchi
{"title":"In search of consent: Agency, audience and identity in memory activism","authors":"Radhika Hettiarachchi","doi":"10.1177/17506980241243034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents a public history practitioner’s perspective on memory activism, critically engaging with the experiences and lessons learned in the implementation of two public history projects in Sri Lanka – the Herstories Project and the Community Memorialisation Project. It draws on personal reflections and observations made while returning to some of the women participants to renew their consent for a new public iteration of their narratives, nearly a decade after first documenting their histories. It examines some of the conceptual and practical questions that emerged while implementing memory projects with the ‘public’ purposes of peacebuilding and transitional justice outcomes. Through six vignettes, it explores the complicated nature of ‘consent’ through the lens of agency, identity and the construction of victimhood. I argue that memory initiatives need to be cognisant of how power asymmetries and ‘macro-narratives’ frame how stories are told, to whom, and for what purpose, and that when consent is given, it is not given in perpetuity.","PeriodicalId":47104,"journal":{"name":"Memory Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Memory Studies","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17506980241243034","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CULTURAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a public history practitioner’s perspective on memory activism, critically engaging with the experiences and lessons learned in the implementation of two public history projects in Sri Lanka – the Herstories Project and the Community Memorialisation Project. It draws on personal reflections and observations made while returning to some of the women participants to renew their consent for a new public iteration of their narratives, nearly a decade after first documenting their histories. It examines some of the conceptual and practical questions that emerged while implementing memory projects with the ‘public’ purposes of peacebuilding and transitional justice outcomes. Through six vignettes, it explores the complicated nature of ‘consent’ through the lens of agency, identity and the construction of victimhood. I argue that memory initiatives need to be cognisant of how power asymmetries and ‘macro-narratives’ frame how stories are told, to whom, and for what purpose, and that when consent is given, it is not given in perpetuity.
寻求同意:记忆活动中的代理、受众和身份
文章从公共历史实践者的角度阐述了记忆行动主义,批判性地探讨了在斯里兰卡实施两个公共历史项目--"她的故事 "项目和 "社区纪念项目"--过程中的经验和教训。本报告借鉴了个人的思考和观察,在首次记录历史近十年后,回到一些女性参与者身边,重新征得她们的同意,对她们的叙述进行新的公开迭代。它探讨了在实施以建设和平和过渡时期司法成果为 "公共 "目的的记忆项目过程中出现的一些概念性和实践性问题。通过六个小故事,从代理、身份和受害者身份构建的角度探讨了 "同意 "的复杂性。我认为,记忆项目需要认识到权力的不对称和 "宏观叙事 "是如何决定故事的讲述方式、讲述对象和讲述目的的,而且当同意被给予时,它并不是永久性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Memory Studies
Memory Studies Multiple-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
18.20%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: Memory Studies is an international peer reviewed journal. Memory Studies affords recognition, form, and direction to work in this nascent field, and provides a critical forum for dialogue and debate on the theoretical, empirical, and methodological issues central to a collaborative understanding of memory today. Memory Studies examines the social, cultural, cognitive, political and technological shifts affecting how, what and why individuals, groups and societies remember, and forget. The journal responds to and seeks to shape public and academic discourse on the nature, manipulation, and contestation of memory in the contemporary era.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信