{"title":"Beyond race: social vulnerability and access to metabolic and bariatric surgery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.soard.2024.05.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is under-accessed by non-White patients, who are disproportionately affected by obesity. We hypothesized that unique barriers experienced by socially vulnerable patients drive disparate MBS utilization.</div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To determine whether socially vulnerable patients experience greater attrition and face more insurance-mandated medical weight management (MWM) requirements.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Urban, academic center.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div><span>This retrospective cohort study included adults evaluated for MBS in 2018. Social vulnerability was determined using the 2018 Social Vulnerability Index. Outcomes included attrition, or failure to undergo surgery within 1</span> <span>year, and the number and duration of MWM requirements. Multivariable logistic regression and negative binomial regression tested these associations.</span></div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>In 2018, 339 patients were evaluated for MBS (83% female, 70% Black). The attrition rate was 57%. On adjusted analyses, patients in the highest social vulnerability quartile had double the odds of attrition compared to their least vulnerable counterparts (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.11-4.92, <em>P</em> = .03). Highly vulnerable patients had double the number (IRR 2.29, 95% CI 1.42-3.72, <em>P</em> = .001) and nearly quadruple the duration (IRR 3.90, 95% CI 1.93-7.86, <em>P</em> < .001) of MWM requirements compared to those with low social vulnerability. Odds of attrition increased by 11% and 20% for each additional MWM visit (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20, <em>P</em> = .02) and month (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33, <em>P</em> = .001), respectively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Patients with high social vulnerability were less likely to undergo MBS and faced more insurance-mandated preoperative requirements, which independently predicted attrition. Insurance-mandated MWM is inequitable and may contribute to disparate care of patients with severe obesity.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":49462,"journal":{"name":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","volume":"20 11","pages":"Pages 1146-1153"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550728924006439","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is under-accessed by non-White patients, who are disproportionately affected by obesity. We hypothesized that unique barriers experienced by socially vulnerable patients drive disparate MBS utilization.
Objectives
To determine whether socially vulnerable patients experience greater attrition and face more insurance-mandated medical weight management (MWM) requirements.
Setting
Urban, academic center.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included adults evaluated for MBS in 2018. Social vulnerability was determined using the 2018 Social Vulnerability Index. Outcomes included attrition, or failure to undergo surgery within 1year, and the number and duration of MWM requirements. Multivariable logistic regression and negative binomial regression tested these associations.
Results
In 2018, 339 patients were evaluated for MBS (83% female, 70% Black). The attrition rate was 57%. On adjusted analyses, patients in the highest social vulnerability quartile had double the odds of attrition compared to their least vulnerable counterparts (OR 2.33, 95% CI 1.11-4.92, P = .03). Highly vulnerable patients had double the number (IRR 2.29, 95% CI 1.42-3.72, P = .001) and nearly quadruple the duration (IRR 3.90, 95% CI 1.93-7.86, P < .001) of MWM requirements compared to those with low social vulnerability. Odds of attrition increased by 11% and 20% for each additional MWM visit (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.02-1.20, P = .02) and month (OR 1.20, 95% CI 1.08-1.33, P = .001), respectively.
Conclusions
Patients with high social vulnerability were less likely to undergo MBS and faced more insurance-mandated preoperative requirements, which independently predicted attrition. Insurance-mandated MWM is inequitable and may contribute to disparate care of patients with severe obesity.
期刊介绍:
Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases (SOARD), The Official Journal of the American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (ASMBS) and the Brazilian Society for Bariatric Surgery, is an international journal devoted to the publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts of the highest quality with objective data regarding techniques for the treatment of severe obesity. Articles document the effects of surgically induced weight loss on obesity physiological, psychiatric and social co-morbidities.