Speech Act of Request :A Contrastive Study Between EFL And ESL Undergraduate Students

Wafa Ismail Saud
{"title":"Speech Act of Request :A Contrastive Study Between EFL And ESL Undergraduate Students","authors":"Wafa Ismail Saud","doi":"10.36586/jcl.2.2024.0.50.0033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study explored the English request strategies and modifiers used by Malaysian and Saudi undergraduates. It also investigated the influence of social power and social distance on their choice of those strategies. Fifty Malaysian ESL and fifty Saudi EFL undergraduates participated in it. A discourse completion task was used to collect the data. Blum-Kulka et al.'s (1989) taxonomy was used to analyse request strategies and Martinez-Flor and Uso-Juan’s (2006) taxonomy was used to analyse request modifiers. Data was collected and analyzed quantitatively. The findings revealed that pragmatic competence varied according to context. Malaysian students in an English as a second language environment used more Conventionally Indirect request strategies than Saudi students did in an English as a foreign language environment. Non-Conventionally Indirect strategies were not used by Malaysians and were employed least often by Saudis. Social status and social distance had no significant influence on their use of request strategies. The study concluded by providing implications for English teachers to foster pragmatic competence among undergraduate students.","PeriodicalId":125897,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the College of languages","volume":"30 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the College of languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36586/jcl.2.2024.0.50.0033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study explored the English request strategies and modifiers used by Malaysian and Saudi undergraduates. It also investigated the influence of social power and social distance on their choice of those strategies. Fifty Malaysian ESL and fifty Saudi EFL undergraduates participated in it. A discourse completion task was used to collect the data. Blum-Kulka et al.'s (1989) taxonomy was used to analyse request strategies and Martinez-Flor and Uso-Juan’s (2006) taxonomy was used to analyse request modifiers. Data was collected and analyzed quantitatively. The findings revealed that pragmatic competence varied according to context. Malaysian students in an English as a second language environment used more Conventionally Indirect request strategies than Saudi students did in an English as a foreign language environment. Non-Conventionally Indirect strategies were not used by Malaysians and were employed least often by Saudis. Social status and social distance had no significant influence on their use of request strategies. The study concluded by providing implications for English teachers to foster pragmatic competence among undergraduate students.
请求的言语行为:EFL 和 ESL 本科生之间的对比研究
本研究探讨了马来西亚和沙特大学生使用的英语请求策略和修饰语。研究还探讨了社会权力和社会距离对他们选择这些策略的影响。50名马来西亚ESL大学生和50名沙特EFL大学生参与了本研究。研究采用了语篇完成任务来收集数据。Blum-Kulka 等人(1989 年)的分类法用于分析请求策略,Martinez-Flor 和 Uso-Juan (2006 年)的分类法用于分析请求修饰语。对数据进行了收集和定量分析。研究结果表明,语用能力因语境而异。在英语作为第二语言的环境中,马来西亚学生比在英语作为外语的环境中的沙特学生使用了更多的常规间接请求策略。马来西亚学生不使用非传统间接策略,而沙特学生使用得最少。社会地位和社会距离对他们使用请求策略没有重大影响。研究最后为英语教师培养本科生的语用能力提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信