Laparoscopic lateral suspension (Dubuisson) in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse

Q4 Medicine
Can Luo, Dongmei Wei, Yueyue Chen, Ling Mei, Xiaoyu Niu
{"title":"Laparoscopic lateral suspension (Dubuisson) in the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse","authors":"Can Luo, Dongmei Wei, Yueyue Chen, Ling Mei, Xiaoyu Niu","doi":"10.1136/gocm-2024-000010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Currently, the global ageing population is becoming increasingly severe, and the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is rising year by year, which seriously impacts the psychosomatic health and the quality of life in female patients. Surgical treatments for POP still face enormous challenges.The aim of this review is to discuss the laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) approach to the management of POP. We use MeSH terms for each topic to retrieve relevant literature from the PubMed and Embase databases. Our group reviewed, synthesised and summarised included studies.LLS has been widely applied in the treatment of middle pelvic compartment defects. In comparison to sacrocolpopexy (SC), the most significant advantage of LLS is that it avoids dissecting the complex sacral region and possesses simple surgical procedures. But its cure, recurrence, reoperation and complication rates have been widely discussed. Issues regarding its value and its potential equivalence in surgical therapeutic effects compared with SC have gained continuous attention.Based on the existing research, LLS demonstrates advantages in the treatment of POP, particularly in cases of middle pelvic compartment defects. However, solely based on current clinical studies, it is premature to establish superiority or inferiority compared with SC. LLS is not yet a substitute for SC.","PeriodicalId":34826,"journal":{"name":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","volume":"21 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/gocm-2024-000010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Currently, the global ageing population is becoming increasingly severe, and the incidence of pelvic organ prolapse (POP) is rising year by year, which seriously impacts the psychosomatic health and the quality of life in female patients. Surgical treatments for POP still face enormous challenges.The aim of this review is to discuss the laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) approach to the management of POP. We use MeSH terms for each topic to retrieve relevant literature from the PubMed and Embase databases. Our group reviewed, synthesised and summarised included studies.LLS has been widely applied in the treatment of middle pelvic compartment defects. In comparison to sacrocolpopexy (SC), the most significant advantage of LLS is that it avoids dissecting the complex sacral region and possesses simple surgical procedures. But its cure, recurrence, reoperation and complication rates have been widely discussed. Issues regarding its value and its potential equivalence in surgical therapeutic effects compared with SC have gained continuous attention.Based on the existing research, LLS demonstrates advantages in the treatment of POP, particularly in cases of middle pelvic compartment defects. However, solely based on current clinical studies, it is premature to establish superiority or inferiority compared with SC. LLS is not yet a substitute for SC.
腹腔镜侧悬吊术(杜比松)治疗盆腔脏器脱垂
目前,全球人口老龄化日趋严重,盆腔器官脱垂(POP)的发病率逐年上升,严重影响了女性患者的心理健康和生活质量。本综述旨在讨论腹腔镜侧悬吊术(LLS)治疗 POP 的方法。我们使用 MeSH 术语对每个主题从 PubMed 和 Embase 数据库中检索相关文献。我们小组对纳入的研究进行了回顾、综合和总结。LLS已被广泛应用于中骨盆室缺损的治疗。与骶骨结节成形术(SC)相比,LLS最大的优点是避免了解剖复杂的骶骨区域,手术操作简单。但其治愈率、复发率、再次手术率和并发症发生率已引起广泛讨论。根据现有研究,LLS 在治疗 POP,尤其是中骨盆室缺损方面具有优势。然而,仅凭目前的临床研究来确定 LLS 与 SC 相比的优劣还为时过早。LLS 尚不能替代 SC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine
Gynecology and Obstetrics Clinical Medicine Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
35
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信