{"title":"Remote Sensing-Based Assessments of Socioeconomic Factors for Urban Ecological Resilience in the Semi-Arid Region","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Ecological resources sustain life, influencing ecology and landscape but demanding sustenance. Urbanization is impacting such resources, which is a critical concern for stakeholders. However, appreciating green infrastructure (ecological resources) is relative as the resourceful and resource-deficient nourish divergent views. Socioeconomic determinants significantly influence urban environmental integrity, making their study cardinal. This study evaluated the empirical information for holistic appraisals. The data were obtained from planned (Faisalabad) and semi-planned (Jhang) cities through a cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire from 250 households. These two cities were selected because they are physically and economically homogenous but have divergent urbanization trends. Findings construe 48.6% perceiving the environment as unhealthy. About 97.6% understood urban ecological degradation, showing concern. The statistical inferences based on Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests rendered that age, education, profession, and nature of job influence (</span><em>P</em><span> ≤ 0.05) awareness regarding urban-ecological resilience. In contrast, gender, duration of stay, and income were insignificant. However, 64.6% showed an inclination for active participation. Contrarily, the majority complained about the city administration. The meagerness of female participation was noticeable, demanding redressal. An enhanced focus on the younger segments of urban society is also needed. Conclusions render that all stakeholders must join hands for urban ecological resilience.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 12-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Ecological resources sustain life, influencing ecology and landscape but demanding sustenance. Urbanization is impacting such resources, which is a critical concern for stakeholders. However, appreciating green infrastructure (ecological resources) is relative as the resourceful and resource-deficient nourish divergent views. Socioeconomic determinants significantly influence urban environmental integrity, making their study cardinal. This study evaluated the empirical information for holistic appraisals. The data were obtained from planned (Faisalabad) and semi-planned (Jhang) cities through a cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire from 250 households. These two cities were selected because they are physically and economically homogenous but have divergent urbanization trends. Findings construe 48.6% perceiving the environment as unhealthy. About 97.6% understood urban ecological degradation, showing concern. The statistical inferences based on Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests rendered that age, education, profession, and nature of job influence (P ≤ 0.05) awareness regarding urban-ecological resilience. In contrast, gender, duration of stay, and income were insignificant. However, 64.6% showed an inclination for active participation. Contrarily, the majority complained about the city administration. The meagerness of female participation was noticeable, demanding redressal. An enhanced focus on the younger segments of urban society is also needed. Conclusions render that all stakeholders must join hands for urban ecological resilience.
期刊介绍:
Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes.
Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.