Remote Sensing-Based Assessments of Socioeconomic Factors for Urban Ecological Resilience in the Semi-Arid Region

IF 2.4 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ECOLOGY
{"title":"Remote Sensing-Based Assessments of Socioeconomic Factors for Urban Ecological Resilience in the Semi-Arid Region","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.rama.2024.04.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>Ecological resources sustain life, influencing ecology and landscape but demanding sustenance. Urbanization is impacting such resources, which is a critical concern for stakeholders. However, appreciating green infrastructure (ecological resources) is relative as the resourceful and resource-deficient nourish divergent views. Socioeconomic determinants significantly influence urban environmental integrity, making their study cardinal. This study evaluated the empirical information for holistic appraisals. The data were obtained from planned (Faisalabad) and semi-planned (Jhang) cities through a cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire from 250 households. These two cities were selected because they are physically and economically homogenous but have divergent urbanization trends. Findings construe 48.6% perceiving the environment as unhealthy. About 97.6% understood urban ecological degradation, showing concern. The statistical inferences based on Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests rendered that age, education, profession, and nature of job influence (</span><em>P</em><span> ≤ 0.05) awareness regarding urban-ecological resilience. In contrast, gender, duration of stay, and income were insignificant. However, 64.6% showed an inclination for active participation. Contrarily, the majority complained about the city administration. The meagerness of female participation was noticeable, demanding redressal. An enhanced focus on the younger segments of urban society is also needed. Conclusions render that all stakeholders must join hands for urban ecological resilience.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":49634,"journal":{"name":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","volume":"96 ","pages":"Pages 12-22"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rangeland Ecology & Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1550742424000691","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ecological resources sustain life, influencing ecology and landscape but demanding sustenance. Urbanization is impacting such resources, which is a critical concern for stakeholders. However, appreciating green infrastructure (ecological resources) is relative as the resourceful and resource-deficient nourish divergent views. Socioeconomic determinants significantly influence urban environmental integrity, making their study cardinal. This study evaluated the empirical information for holistic appraisals. The data were obtained from planned (Faisalabad) and semi-planned (Jhang) cities through a cross-sectional survey using a structured questionnaire from 250 households. These two cities were selected because they are physically and economically homogenous but have divergent urbanization trends. Findings construe 48.6% perceiving the environment as unhealthy. About 97.6% understood urban ecological degradation, showing concern. The statistical inferences based on Kruskal–Wallis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests rendered that age, education, profession, and nature of job influence (P ≤ 0.05) awareness regarding urban-ecological resilience. In contrast, gender, duration of stay, and income were insignificant. However, 64.6% showed an inclination for active participation. Contrarily, the majority complained about the city administration. The meagerness of female participation was noticeable, demanding redressal. An enhanced focus on the younger segments of urban society is also needed. Conclusions render that all stakeholders must join hands for urban ecological resilience.

基于遥感的半干旱地区城市生态复原力社会经济因素评估
生态资源维系着生命,影响着生态和景观,但也要求得到保护。城市化正在影响这些资源,这也是利益相关者的重要关切。然而,欣赏绿色基础设施(生态资源)是相对的,因为资源丰富者和资源匮乏者持有不同的观点。社会经济决定因素对城市环境完整性有重大影响,因此对其进行研究至关重要。本研究评估了整体评价的经验信息。数据来自规划城市(费萨拉巴德)和半规划城市(张家港),采用结构式问卷对 250 个家庭进行横截面调查。之所以选择这两个城市,是因为它们在自然和经济方面都很相似,但城市化趋势却各不相同。调查结果显示,48.6% 的人认为环境不健康。约 97.6% 的人对城市生态退化表示理解和担忧。基于 Kruskal-Wallis 和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验的统计推断表明,年龄、教育程度、职业和工作性质对城市生态复原力的认识有影响(P ≤ 0.05)。相比之下,性别、居住时间和收入的影响不明显。不过,64.6% 的人表示愿意积极参与。相反,大多数人抱怨城市管理。值得注意的是,女性参与的积极性不高,需要得到纠正。还需要加强对城市社会年轻群体的关注。结论表明,所有利益相关者必须携手提高城市生态复原力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Rangeland Ecology & Management
Rangeland Ecology & Management 农林科学-环境科学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
13.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: Rangeland Ecology & Management publishes all topics-including ecology, management, socioeconomic and policy-pertaining to global rangelands. The journal''s mission is to inform academics, ecosystem managers and policy makers of science-based information to promote sound rangeland stewardship. Author submissions are published in five manuscript categories: original research papers, high-profile forum topics, concept syntheses, as well as research and technical notes. Rangelands represent approximately 50% of the Earth''s land area and provision multiple ecosystem services for large human populations. This expansive and diverse land area functions as coupled human-ecological systems. Knowledge of both social and biophysical system components and their interactions represent the foundation for informed rangeland stewardship. Rangeland Ecology & Management uniquely integrates information from multiple system components to address current and pending challenges confronting global rangelands.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信